Active Users:383 Time:16/09/2026 02:18:03 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
So? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM

View original post
The reactions of the characters of the book are based on the character's perception. As a reader, we are privileged to know the totality of that character.

Precisely, so there's no ambiguity.


Based on that totality, "it" is appropriate based on the context.

No, it is not. I'm not sure what relevance Aran'gar being a character has to do with anything.

Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. Cannoli - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 973 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. damookster - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 670 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 705 Views
I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:26:41 AM 740 Views
Re: I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" Cannoli - 13/11/2018 02:40:05 AM 683 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. Legolas - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 638 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 661 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* TyrReborn - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 428 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? Legolas - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 667 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain damookster - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 593 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 648 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity Cannoli - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 662 Views
Okay, sure. Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 676 Views
Interesting.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 640 Views
Because it is just contempt Roland00 - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 819 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. Legolas - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 660 Views
Who's on the phone? aerocontrols - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 660 Views
Sure, I agree. Legolas - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 665 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong fionwe1987 - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 687 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book HyogaRott - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 655 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 645 Views
Re: So? HyogaRott - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 643 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post Cannoli - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 638 Views
Thank you. *NM* Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 313 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes