Active Users:468 Time:26/03/2026 12:03:22 PM
Since game 4 or 5, roughly Isaac Send a noteboard - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM
Admittedly, I can't recall a specific instance, but you often set up traps, and I do remember one time when, at the very beginning of the game, you spoke of having a few traps to lay to try and catch DFs.


IIRC, I was a DF at the time, it was game 9, yes? ;) I always have traps out when I'm a DF.

However, context is important, what I mean by trap in this context is not the same as what my brand of personal traps is. Which is basically something that really does make sense to do but gives a secret extra profit, no real chance for backfire. ALternatively, it's setting up a situation in which there are two logical courses of action, and once introduced it's almost guaranteed people will take one of those two routes. Sometimes they are long term strateies too, aimed at future games. There always simple, they're usually win-win, and they can't really backfire - or at least that's what I aim for in design.

In that game, getting everyone to put forward an ambassador was a trap. That's how, as you may recall, come night 1 I was able to tell you and Hobo which houses everyone was in with the exception of two players who were either A in X and B in Y, or A in Y and B in X. That was a 'trap', it fed us way more info than the town got out of it, info that was more useful to us then them in any event, it had no real chance of backfiring. What else did it get us? Across the board our DF faction profitted hugely from that 'trap'. I was placed in position as a de facto regent, and basically was able to set the agenda from that point on, and that's power, because you can make it that almost everything that happens is either what you propose, or specifically not that, instead of something else someone else might suggest out of left field. That's a 'trap'.

But the traps I warn people about using are different. Springing MGD instead of MPD, that could be a trap, but not a good one, because most people don't constantly refer back to their NB and an innocent townie might say, yep, MGD #X without even realizing it, and in this case would have backfired. DFs had MPD too and would have been far more likely to be wary of a mistake there, would not have been caught by it even if their letters were different. But I bet a townie would have stepped into it. What was the trap? Another win-win, we'd know that whoever answered first was clean, but there was a backfire even on that, just not a big one, the first answer came from someone who had #14, the same number of players we had, and therefore would be in a much better position, DF or town, to assume every player had one from 1-14. Hence why Hobo is just a semi-prob-town in my book, had someone answered MPD #2 first, they'd have been prob-town. Yet even that was win-win because he couldn't claim 'def-town' from it, and that was the worst case backfire, a DF acquiring a patina of townie-ness, because there really weren't any numbers that could have done that and yet would be inclined to take the risk of answering first.

ANyway, I don't call my stuff 'traps' in my own head, they're strategies. I'm methodical and often write them down, mathemetician's bias perhaps, I think better on paper. Helps me find flaws easier too, look at the notes the next time and my own personal connection is gone, it's like someone else wrote them, and it's easier for me to see the flaws.

Since so many of them are things that are likely not to even happen, usually at the bottom I write 'Trigger' (that's right where it game from for game 8 ) and a lot of times the trigger event is something like 'a player accuses X based of Y' and what you do is you just scatter half a dozen or so of these through out the game and wait till someone steps in one. But specific 'traps', these tend to backfire a lot just because when someone puts all their energy into one thing, it's often pretty obvious they are up to something, sometimes you can even see what it is. Either way, DF knows to avoid the area if they pick up on that, and often the person is so invested into that trap that they can't bring themselves to see the flaws, or if they do they try to salvage it by making it more complex which only makes it worse. They also tend to put false info into them, which hurts the town and can hurt you if you're a DF too, the difference being a DF has no choice but to lie anyway, so they may as well risk it.

It's like this whole message, it's a trap, my style of trap, see if anyone can guess one of them, see how even figuring one out probably won't blunt the trap and may even assist it. Maybe I should call them 'tarps' though, since I think I mispelled it that ways every time I used it in this message (obviously corrected in preview). I like that though, henceforth I shall refer to them as 'Tarps' :)
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3755 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1534 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 954 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1611 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1492 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1678 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1477 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1666 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1541 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1586 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1566 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1451 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1534 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1523 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 1352 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1433 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1475 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1526 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1535 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1479 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 908 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1486 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1456 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1454 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1478 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1490 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1584 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1471 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1596 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1504 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1668 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1623 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1713 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 938 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 849 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1589 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 850 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1343 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 805 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 943 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 857 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 862 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 865 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 824 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1543 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1495 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1428 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1451 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1422 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1463 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 1316 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 886 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 868 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1603 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1410 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1516 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 850 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1536 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 768 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 778 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1495 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1556 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1388 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 798 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 1300 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1551 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1471 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1520 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1461 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1584 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1399 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 863 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1802 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 857 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 878 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 853 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1397 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 822 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1530 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1422 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1668 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1419 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 798 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1433 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 857 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1493 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 747 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1580 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1417 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 850 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1521 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1485 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1467 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1418 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 826 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1456 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1584 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1422 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 790 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1662 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1433 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1330 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1499 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1665 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1614 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1580 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1523 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1461 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1659 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1441 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1317 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1365 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1456 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1538 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1414 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1496 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1376 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1415 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1455 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1401 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1463 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1589 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1452 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1434 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 1310 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1678 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1662 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1455 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1371 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1524 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1642 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1535 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1485 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1430 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1400 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1721 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1470 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 1295 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1559 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1500 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1498 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1302 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1597 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1373 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1510 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1419 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1424 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1338 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1457 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1417 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1495 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1481 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1534 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1421 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 869 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1380 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1402 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1486 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1359 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1493 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1450 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1460 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 865 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1459 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1497 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1538 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 913 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1451 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1407 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1565 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1650 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1471 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1541 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1467 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1521 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1500 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1562 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1409 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1454 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1498 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1539 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 873 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1482 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1499 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1520 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1570 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1465 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1372 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1386 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1408 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1624 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1408 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1625 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1392 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1423 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1401 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 1202 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1573 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1402 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1543 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1536 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1515 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 1281 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1385 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1422 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1360 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1365 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1439 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1409 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1426 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1466 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1497 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1431 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1588 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1357 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1568 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 854 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 853 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 833 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 819 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1458 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1502 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1431 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1415 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1344 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1496 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1380 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1444 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1488 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1513 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1496 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1495 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1294 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1402 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1417 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 830 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1331 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1466 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1544 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1567 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1608 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1386 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1464 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 918 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1569 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1498 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1494 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1363 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1340 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 814 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1486 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 887 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 848 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1456 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1518 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1496 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1404 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1489 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1505 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1529 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1621 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1418 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1403 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 832 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1591 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1628 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1472 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1429 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1518 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1507 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1476 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1498 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1490 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1420 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1529 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1509 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1530 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1590 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1640 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1606 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1476 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1427 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1590 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1601 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1391 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1556 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1427 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1419 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1545 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 736 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1398 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1521 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 733 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1537 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1426 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1480 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1400 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1462 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 830 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1434 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 843 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 837 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1524 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 848 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 827 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1437 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1608 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1592 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 747 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1500 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1509 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1529 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1548 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1583 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1468 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1437 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1539 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1404 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1499 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 1328 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1492 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1371 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 863 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1514 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1662 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1425 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1482 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1347 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1416 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1335 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1454 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1427 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 804 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 2205 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1572 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 2141 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1413 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 823 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1442 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1432 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1550 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1403 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1364 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1394 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1491 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1415 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1399 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1513 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1494 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1399 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1503 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1546 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1565 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1455 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1353 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1572 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 802 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1385 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1449 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 844 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 921 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1410 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1483 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1589 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1465 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1494 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1406 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1481 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1399 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1452 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1374 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 1325 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 1340 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1381 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1369 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1337 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1411 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1581 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1517 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1550 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1671 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1319 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1430 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1556 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1419 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1374 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1445 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1397 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1493 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1508 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1528 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1536 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1590 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 874 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 867 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 783 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 828 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 749 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 867 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 814 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 921 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 800 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 836 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 831 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 1329 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1521 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 843 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 1320 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1641 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1557 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1388 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1426 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1452 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1514 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1486 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 825 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 746 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 895 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1548 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1545 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1573 Views

Reply to Message