Active Users:322 Time:02/07/2025 10:28:55 PM
You seem to have misunbderstood my question Isaac Send a noteboard - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM
I had just said that I will tell you what's up in my last post. I know you read it. Don't say nobody's willing. I asked you questions in that post that you just decided not to respond to. Very frustrating, if you ask me.


You wrote like maybe thirty words, which included asking me what I would like explained. Considering the message you replied to was basically 'all of it' your response is very similiar to this:

"Senator, do have an opinion on Afghanistan?"

"Yes"

You see how the question kind of implies "and will you tell us what it is?"

I asked:

"if ranagrande said something suspicious someone's gonna have to explain what and how."

and you responded:

"Hmm...well as I said, I thought I made myself pretty clear but yeah...I'm jsut about ready to vote for him if this inactivity gets any worse. I, myself, have had a test today and have another tomorrow which I should be studying for. So I'm gonna get back to that. But give me what your confused about with ranagrande or just tell me that you don't understand it at all and I can go back over my points for you."

Emphaisis mine, I think the answer to that was probably legitimately implied by my saying in the post before that "and again, if ranagrande said something suspicious someone's gonna have to explain what and how. I tihnk my own personal level and form of paranaoi might make me a bit color blind on some things." This seems to me to be a pretty blunt statement translating as "I have no idea what you guys are talking about, please explain", so you see how asking me to tell you what I'm not clear on is sort of a needless question, since the context seems pretty clear that the part I'm not clear on is everything. Okay, I got the 'inactivity thing' but you didn't really show that and I had to check and it turned out to be wrong.

Now, keep in mind I am also talking to beetnemesis, not just you. I already clarified that ranagrande's posting is not low, either compared to player average or his own tendency, which was the only point you got specific on. He had 25 posts, out of around 400 with 14 players and a mod. 400 divided by 15 is 26, 25 is not much lower than 26, and let's not forget that quite a lot of the posts were me and FT skirmishing, me in my usual long-winded fashion, and a bunch of the players from early games (which he isn't) discussing earlier games. I'm disinclined to vote for someone based off their inactivity when they're basically average. Having assumed you read that, since you just replied to the message I said it in, I would like to know what else beet and presumably you find suspciious in his comments, since his 'inactivity' is not even vaguely suspicious, seeing as it is not true.

So his posting rate seems normal, especially for him, he's never been a highly frequent and lengthy poster. Now, I'm tempted to post all his posts in one big mush below and have you and fox point out to me what he says that you both consider so suspicious, because I think I've reread all his comments by now and I'm not seeing it, and all I'm getting in feedback is 'his comments are suspcious', well, I need to know which comments you think are suspicious and why you think they are. Maybe if you point them out to me I'll see it, but as is, just rereading his comments they seemed normal chatter.

Do it, and I'll do my best.


Do what? Post the entirety of his every comment? That's fairly time consuming consider I'm not the one accusing him, you and beet are you know, traditionally, the prosecutor doesn't ask the defense attorney "Well, if you're read off everything he's done in the last month I'd be happy to tell you which of those we are charging him for", I kinda assumed you and beet already knew what was suspicious.

I don't know about you being suspicious but I gotta go study some more so I can't post anymore of my thoughts now. Later, though, after you ask some questions about ranagrande, I'll talk more.


I have the same question as before, "What has he done or said that you find suspicious?" I have no idea how else I am supposed to phrase that Fox. All give it a try, here is what I would like you and/or beet to answer.

Are there some comments he has made you find abnormally suspicious? If yes, please indicate which ones via quaotation or link.

If such comments exist, please explain clearly why they are suspicious, please do not include the words 'vibe', 'instinct', or 'feeling'

Do you, after my posting his total post value and the average, feel that he has been abnromally inactive? If yes, do you mean inactive compared to the average or inactive for his norm. PLease show numerical proof.

Are there any actions you have taken which you feel highlight him as a suspect?

If yes, what actions are they and why do you feel they highlight him?
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over. - 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM 3529 Views
List of Players - 08/02/2010 06:58:04 PM 1324 Views
This is great, thanks! *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:19:25 AM 841 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:25:25 AM 1428 Views
Crap! - 15/02/2010 03:26:24 AM 1310 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM 1471 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM 1280 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia? - 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM 1424 Views
I am not Hopper - 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM 1343 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME - 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM 1395 Views
Now that's a questionable claim. - 09/02/2010 02:36:25 AM 1380 Views
Hah! You underestimate my ego, madam! - 09/02/2010 06:25:28 AM 1272 Views
A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM 1353 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 10:31:32 PM 1353 Views
Re: A few questions and comments - 08/02/2010 11:23:07 PM 1158 Views
Third Party - 08/02/2010 09:43:57 PM 1211 Views
Re: Third Party - 08/02/2010 10:34:38 PM 1300 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM 1332 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion - 09/02/2010 03:53:18 AM 1318 Views
I thinking Lynching F-T was the right thing to do. - 09/02/2010 04:45:13 AM 1285 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM* - 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM 824 Views
You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM 1299 Views
NO! - 09/02/2010 01:31:57 AM 1251 Views
Re: You know what? - 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM 1242 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM 1298 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM 1300 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM 1353 Views
Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:05:04 AM 1256 Views
Re: Oh, I learned all those lessons last year. - 09/02/2010 04:50:41 AM 1383 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry. - 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM 1328 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement. - 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM 1488 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family. - 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM 1296 Views
See, that way the betrayal is personal. - 09/02/2010 04:41:47 AM 1508 Views
Ouch *NM* - 09/02/2010 04:58:13 PM 813 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 01:02:30 AM 753 Views
Hypocop (Table) - 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM 1380 Views
Beetnemesis, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:17:10 AM 757 Views
Okay - 09/02/2010 01:29:09 AM 1178 Views
Kronin, innocent. *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:53:09 AM 714 Views
Isaac, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:12:07 AM 811 Views
Isaac, innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 02:37:54 AM 755 Views
Investigated fistofpainx, found him to be innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 06:27:37 AM 757 Views
DK, found her innocent *NM* - 09/02/2010 01:48:11 PM 779 Views
Fox and Ravens, Guilty *NM* - 09/02/2010 03:57:50 PM 742 Views
Vote Record (Table) - 09/02/2010 01:30:51 AM 1370 Views
I'll add: list of players who did NOT vote yesterday - 09/02/2010 06:46:38 AM 1323 Views
RBIRL - 09/02/2010 04:45:19 AM 1254 Views
Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM 1281 Views
Re: Hmmm, - 09/02/2010 07:20:02 AM 1219 Views
Yeah, I agree with the Blaine rationalization - 09/02/2010 08:57:19 AM 1278 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh - 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM 1117 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM* - 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM 795 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM 757 Views
Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 04:57:26 PM 1417 Views
Re: Well, yeah... - 09/02/2010 07:27:00 PM 1228 Views
I want to throw this out here. - 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM 1328 Views
What changed your mind? *NM* - 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM 751 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone. - 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM 1290 Views
*NM* - 10/02/2010 02:56:52 AM 683 Views
I thought you'd like that. *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:00:19 PM 683 Views
I was going to post a few thoughts here this morning... - 09/02/2010 01:49:26 PM 1281 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM 1353 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic". - 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM 1179 Views
Good point. Is an arsonist usually a third party? *NM* - 10/02/2010 12:28:10 AM 708 Views
That's so arbitrary, though. - 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM 1144 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante. - 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM 1375 Views
That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM 1314 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning - 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM 1325 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that - 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM 1297 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense. - 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM 1403 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable - 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM 1233 Views
Oh, my bad then! *NM* - 10/02/2010 10:19:13 PM 770 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism - 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM 1607 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM* - 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM 755 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM* - 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM 789 Views
I was the best vigilante you guys have ever had! *NM* - 12/02/2010 02:19:57 AM 744 Views
The only vigilante we've ever had. - 12/02/2010 02:25:20 AM 1235 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM* - 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM 737 Views
Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:19:10 AM 1341 Views
Re: Maybe it's been proposed. - 10/02/2010 05:56:10 AM 1272 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 12:50:51 AM 1452 Views
Re: Why is everyone assuming we have a SK? - 10/02/2010 01:11:50 AM 1227 Views
Because we have a SK *NM* - 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM 703 Views
I agree that we probably have a SK - 10/02/2010 07:50:33 PM 1249 Views
Nah, I was just saying *NM* - 11/02/2010 05:06:54 AM 766 Views
wait a minute - 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM 1302 Views
Sensors? *NM* - 10/02/2010 01:42:36 PM 657 Views
Another thing - 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM 1412 Views
F-T, I assume - 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM 1237 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM* - 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM 767 Views
I don't think it could be a RB - 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM 1337 Views
Probably not, but not for that reason - 10/02/2010 08:32:57 PM 1309 Views
Huh. - 10/02/2010 09:11:29 PM 1307 Views
Did anyone get any messages last night? - 10/02/2010 08:23:03 PM 1247 Views
Nope *NM* - 10/02/2010 08:35:18 PM 734 Views
Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:14:46 PM 1297 Views
Re: Me neither. - 10/02/2010 09:41:19 PM 1422 Views
RBIRL - 11/02/2010 04:52:12 PM 1240 Views
Good luck! *NM* - 11/02/2010 07:05:40 PM 708 Views
Re: RBIRL - 11/02/2010 09:59:39 PM 1483 Views
We're stalling out a bit - 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM 1249 Views
Yep. - 12/02/2010 02:58:02 AM 1187 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine... - 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM 1323 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game - 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM 1475 Views
Yawn... - 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM 1435 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM 1404 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM 1339 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:24:40 AM 1286 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself - 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM 1446 Views
Dammit, I had a post and then it got deleted. - 14/02/2010 01:45:31 AM 1264 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again. - 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM 1138 Views
Always happy to answer your questions - 14/02/2010 07:35:35 AM 1167 Views
Thanks for the answers. - 15/02/2010 07:29:31 PM 1280 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:02:34 AM 1351 Views
Re: Yawn... - 13/02/2010 02:48:22 AM 1236 Views
On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM 1325 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you. - 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM 1210 Views
Oh, right, I modded that one. - 14/02/2010 04:11:46 AM 1238 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records - 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM 1281 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one - 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM 1200 Views
I'm in second? Woo! - 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM 1282 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod - 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM 1421 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT. - 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM 1288 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you - 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM 1266 Views
Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM 1149 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember. - 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM 1488 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart. - 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM 1469 Views
Oh, the MHael Steve incident! - 15/02/2010 04:42:31 AM 1272 Views
The game? Oh, right, that. - 15/02/2010 04:41:43 AM 1183 Views
Actually... - 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM 1374 Views
Sorry, it was my first game. - 16/02/2010 03:34:16 AM 1452 Views
That was my point actually. - 16/02/2010 06:25:17 AM 1333 Views
Those were the good old days. - 18/02/2010 01:21:44 AM 1322 Views
random thoughts - 15/02/2010 12:46:55 PM 1232 Views
I wasn't in that game. - 18/02/2010 01:19:06 AM 1237 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande - 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM 1537 Views
Argh... quote please - 12/02/2010 08:54:08 PM 1309 Views
Haha, fair enough - 12/02/2010 11:30:54 PM 1129 Views
I was getting all set to defend myself - 13/02/2010 01:21:58 AM 1397 Views
RBIRL - 14/02/2010 06:11:55 AM 1323 Views
Back - 18/02/2010 02:14:25 AM 1340 Views
Vote: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM 1138 Views
Re: Hieshyn - 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM 1426 Views
That's giving up awfully early. - 15/02/2010 07:35:37 PM 1209 Views
Never give up! Never surrender! - 15/02/2010 08:31:19 PM 1343 Views
Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM 1238 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected. - 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM 1252 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF - 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM 1160 Views
I don't think so - 16/02/2010 12:09:13 AM 1277 Views
I assumed - 16/02/2010 12:14:16 AM 1251 Views
Re: I assumed - 16/02/2010 01:28:43 AM 1324 Views
In a way Isaac is right - 16/02/2010 05:24:08 AM 1293 Views
If he was the SK - 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM 1366 Views
How many games did you guys play on wotmania, anyway? - 15/02/2010 08:43:04 PM 1240 Views
9 *NM* - 15/02/2010 08:53:23 PM 786 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM 1233 Views
Oh that's right! - 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM 1212 Views
We just took that game over. - 15/02/2010 10:12:43 PM 1306 Views
Oh yeah, we owned that one - 15/02/2010 11:48:12 PM 1199 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession. - 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 1322 Views
Lol irony - 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM 1292 Views
what I thought was pretty funny - 16/02/2010 12:41:47 AM 1284 Views
Heh heh the Cairhienins would be proud *NM* - 16/02/2010 01:11:13 AM 769 Views
Oh, Isaac got High Seat there, didn't he? - 16/02/2010 01:33:05 AM 1287 Views
That was a fun one. - 18/02/2010 01:32:02 AM 1322 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people - 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM 1365 Views
well I really dont have anything worthwhile to say *NM* - 15/02/2010 10:06:11 PM 825 Views
Eh... not good enough - 16/02/2010 12:19:22 AM 1275 Views
Holiday weekend - 15/02/2010 11:49:37 PM 1243 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing. - 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM 1376 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM 1487 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky - 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM 1298 Views
It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 04:46:54 AM 1356 Views
Re: It wasn't really a big thing. - 16/02/2010 05:30:34 AM 1312 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched - 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM 1361 Views
Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM 1314 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can. - 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM 1381 Views
Since when are you against traps? - 16/02/2010 04:07:05 PM 1213 Views
Since game 4 or 5, roughly - 16/02/2010 10:57:19 PM 1257 Views
I'm glad it did too. - 16/02/2010 01:16:14 PM 1312 Views
Regarding Inactivity and whatnot - 16/02/2010 06:22:14 AM 1370 Views
RBIRL - exams Thursday *NM* - 17/02/2010 02:11:27 AM 779 Views
So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM 1299 Views
Re: So, where are we at? - 18/02/2010 03:55:33 AM 1333 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7 - 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM 1327 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM 1417 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself - 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM 1286 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything - 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM 1195 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off. - 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM 1216 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM 1230 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question - 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM 1402 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM 1241 Views
My post, "Re: Hieshyn" - 18/02/2010 06:32:12 PM 1459 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2 - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM 1230 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it - 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM 1280 Views
A few thoughts - 19/02/2010 03:22:32 PM 1230 Views
Alright then. - 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM 1053 Views
EBWOP - 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM 1368 Views
Haha, I'm sorry - 19/02/2010 05:49:00 PM 1231 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM 1367 Views
Naive? - 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM 1373 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick - 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM 1324 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like - 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM 1119 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game... - 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM 1207 Views
That's true- I've said as much earlier in this thread - 20/02/2010 02:08:47 AM 1278 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM 1197 Views
Re: EBWOP - 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM 1206 Views
Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 06:03:18 AM 1263 Views
Re: Speaking of that game - 20/02/2010 05:24:16 PM 1259 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN! - 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM 1256 Views
Hey. - 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM 1295 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:19:30 PM 1313 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 06:50:35 PM 1238 Views
Re: Hey. - 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM 1394 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF - 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM 1205 Views
Don't put words in my mouth. - 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM 1355 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM 773 Views
Well OK, a BIT more, because we know he was townie *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:34 PM 763 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM* - 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM 747 Views
Fair enough *NM* - 18/02/2010 08:19:04 PM 727 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts? - 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM 1290 Views
I think that - 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM 1346 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions... - 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM 1247 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM 1250 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM 1185 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you? - 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM 1330 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence. - 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM 1227 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going - 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM 1279 Views
About voting - 19/02/2010 03:33:34 PM 1309 Views
Idk if that question about voting can be answered. - 20/02/2010 06:15:21 AM 1339 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM 1311 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll) - 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM 1343 Views
I agree - 20/02/2010 02:52:53 PM 1136 Views
Should be fine.. although, maybe only paraphrase? - 20/02/2010 02:03:30 AM 1237 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no - 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM 1236 Views
Seems pretty thorough to me! I pretty much agree. *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:12:40 AM 752 Views
After seeing this thread.... - 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM 1157 Views
Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM 1287 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then. - 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM 1387 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM 1379 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere? - 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM 1445 Views
Well, these are as good a starting point as any. - 20/02/2010 05:22:34 PM 1240 Views
I think quoting NBs from other games is okay. - 20/02/2010 05:15:55 AM 1289 Views
Quoting or paraphrasing is fine IMO *NM* - 20/02/2010 05:31:45 AM 828 Views
Fox and Ranagrande - 20/02/2010 06:30:53 AM 1377 Views
Some comments... - 20/02/2010 07:54:02 PM 1338 Views
Alright. - 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM 1339 Views
Thanks - 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM 1196 Views
Re: Thanks - 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM 1189 Views
Ranagrande *NM* - 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM 725 Views
Really? - 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM 1273 Views
Go back and look at the NB for yourself. *NM* - 21/02/2010 04:29:54 AM 791 Views
That's hilarious. *NM* - 21/02/2010 06:47:57 PM 752 Views
Re: Thanks - 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM 1271 Views
I do have a question - 21/02/2010 07:12:57 PM 1349 Views
A prosaic explanation- (and an objection) - 21/02/2010 09:13:43 PM 1338 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself. - 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM 1240 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1326 Views
Not sure I follow - 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM 1341 Views
Because I might just be blinding myself here. - 22/02/2010 07:40:15 PM 1350 Views
Oh, okay. That does make sense. - 22/02/2010 07:52:10 PM 1458 Views
I think I do - 22/02/2010 07:47:56 PM 1223 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande - 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM 1249 Views
EBWOP - sorry, double post *NM* - 21/02/2010 11:34:21 PM 743 Views
Items of note from my NB archive: - 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM 1410 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM 1450 Views
I'm feeling the same thing. - 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM 1291 Views
Re: I am kind of confused about what you're doing here. - 22/02/2010 08:07:19 PM 1268 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 - 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM 1362 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis - 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM 1333 Views
That sounds about right to me. - 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM 1297 Views
(My two cents) - 22/02/2010 08:35:17 PM 1328 Views
Dude. - 22/02/2010 08:53:30 PM 1322 Views
Re: Dude. - 22/02/2010 09:45:52 PM 1270 Views
Thanks. - 23/02/2010 07:04:29 AM 1338 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM 1354 Views
You didn't read the entirety of my quote post did you? - 22/02/2010 07:42:14 PM 1348 Views
Actually, I do have a small confession to make about that... - 22/02/2010 08:14:08 PM 1431 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande - 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM 1468 Views
Fair enough - 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM 1412 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1324 Views
Re: Fair enough - 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM 1271 Views
Numbers? - 22/02/2010 09:36:51 PM 1420 Views
Re: Numbers? - 22/02/2010 10:21:13 PM 1419 Views
I don't think he's innocent. OR a DF - 22/02/2010 10:42:16 PM 1230 Views
Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM 1383 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 22/02/2010 09:38:09 PM 1266 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it.... - 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM 1230 Views
I will destroy the world - 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM 1371 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM* - 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM 649 Views
Ok, that's totally different... - 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM 1229 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent. - 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM 1344 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM* - 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM 651 Views
No, this is my view: - 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM 1368 Views
And my view was: - 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM 1250 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know - 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM 1323 Views
I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 01:52:07 AM 1254 Views
Re: I'm just pointing out the irony. - 25/02/2010 06:47:45 AM 1294 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM* - 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM 745 Views
Can I ask why? - 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM 1267 Views
I'd be very interested in seeing an explanation as well *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:04:30 PM 751 Views
Ditto. *NM* - 24/02/2010 08:09:31 PM 760 Views
My, my, how totally unexpected - 24/02/2010 01:01:42 PM 1325 Views
Reasoning would be nice *NM* - 24/02/2010 10:13:43 PM 748 Views
Eh? *NM* - 25/02/2010 01:47:19 AM 740 Views
Hieshyn I will DESTROY you - 27/02/2010 01:41:25 AM 1248 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn - 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM 1431 Views
You're right, Isaac. - 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM 1427 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM* - 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM 653 Views
Hieshyns and Foxes and Beets! Oh my! - 26/02/2010 02:59:51 PM 1331 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM 1328 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 06:10:33 AM 1348 Views
Re: At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap - 26/02/2010 07:00:02 AM 1388 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM 1411 Views
Here's what I'm getting from this: - 27/02/2010 06:49:22 AM 1302 Views
Could be - 27/02/2010 06:16:30 PM 1264 Views
Re: Could be - 27/02/2010 07:15:07 PM 1363 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS. - 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM 1225 Views
Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:13:12 PM 1333 Views
Re: Well, we have a very weird situation here - 27/02/2010 05:40:16 PM 1138 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM 1308 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy. - 27/02/2010 07:55:13 AM 1212 Views
Gotcha, thanks. *NM* - 27/02/2010 08:07:21 AM 766 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM 1337 Views
Re: Okay, let's try to finish off today - 27/02/2010 08:24:14 PM 1497 Views
Interesting. - 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM 1250 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it - 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM 1301 Views
Oh, right. - 28/02/2010 04:32:13 AM 1169 Views
Vote: ranagrande - 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM 1245 Views
Hmmm - 27/02/2010 11:31:52 PM 1144 Views
Re: Hmmm - 28/02/2010 12:41:07 AM 1302 Views
What, if anything, has changed? - 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM 1265 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM* - 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM 716 Views
A little joke - 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM 1991 Views
Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 05:41:14 AM 1398 Views
Re: Haha nice. - 28/02/2010 06:29:58 AM 1943 Views
Woah, that's a pretty sneaky trick with the quote links. - 28/02/2010 07:14:22 AM 1228 Views
Oh, and RBIRL: midterms week. *NM* - 27/02/2010 09:35:25 PM 755 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text) - 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM 1260 Views
Why do you keep calling my death inevitable? - 28/02/2010 02:51:26 AM 1241 Views
Because you have often said you're a lightning rod - 28/02/2010 07:48:14 AM 1380 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis - 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM 1261 Views
fair enough - 28/02/2010 04:40:02 AM 1201 Views
Yeah, I would like an explanation. - 28/02/2010 05:00:55 AM 1239 Views
Vote: beetnemesis - 01/03/2010 03:18:00 AM 1313 Views
EBWOP - 01/03/2010 03:20:24 AM 1237 Views
"Jumpy?" - 01/03/2010 05:47:37 AM 1190 Views
Re: "Jumpy?" - 03/03/2010 05:35:50 AM 1306 Views
I GUESS I'll contribute my opinion. - 28/02/2010 06:15:36 AM 1340 Views
What a rebel - 28/02/2010 07:52:50 AM 1232 Views
me and beet - 28/02/2010 01:03:59 PM 1337 Views
my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM 1374 Views
Re: my stance on voting - 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM 1404 Views
well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 04:03:26 AM 1283 Views
Re: well the reason my not posting as much - 01/03/2010 05:28:48 AM 1195 Views
Do you get a ring for voting abstinence? - 01/03/2010 04:56:57 AM 1406 Views
LOL *NM* - 01/03/2010 05:26:14 AM 718 Views
RBIRL until thursday. - 01/03/2010 07:06:50 AM 1216 Views
You undecided people really need to make up your minds - 01/03/2010 07:32:42 PM 1293 Views
Seriously, the suspense is killing me *NM* - 02/03/2010 05:30:26 PM 726 Views
Agreed, this is really getting ridiculous *NM* - 02/03/2010 08:06:12 PM 825 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up? - 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM 1253 Views
Please - 02/03/2010 09:12:36 PM 1297 Views
- 02/03/2010 11:20:19 PM 1421 Views
Re: - 02/03/2010 11:49:21 PM 1322 Views
Did you unvote? - 03/03/2010 04:22:52 AM 1346 Views
I always forget that! - 03/03/2010 01:04:09 PM 1222 Views
I'm sorry. - 03/03/2010 03:54:56 AM 1314 Views
But... I'm much more interesting than some stupid "book!" - 03/03/2010 04:11:02 AM 1252 Views
Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:25:27 AM 1290 Views
Re: Its Hammer Time! - 03/03/2010 05:32:34 AM 1216 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this - 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM 1153 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days - 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM 1145 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these. - 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM 1221 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right. - 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM 1204 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced - 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM 1153 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok... - 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM 1238 Views
Well you figured very wrong - 04/03/2010 01:57:09 AM 1390 Views
All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM 1357 Views
This is a very interesting development - 04/03/2010 02:22:46 AM 1374 Views
Ditto. - 04/03/2010 02:28:18 AM 1487 Views
Re: All right, let's look at this - 04/03/2010 03:46:38 AM 1140 Views
Gosh. - 04/03/2010 04:01:04 AM 1274 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely. - 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM 1370 Views
We're only waiting on Bergioyn and Fist, I believe. - 04/03/2010 05:56:36 AM 1262 Views
Now we are down to Fist - 04/03/2010 03:47:22 PM 1191 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case - 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM 1292 Views
You brought this upon yourself. - 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM 1240 Views
Your fencing smiley has dulled my scathing retort - 03/03/2010 05:19:49 PM 1320 Views
- 03/03/2010 05:34:11 PM 1344 Views
I'm back. - 03/03/2010 07:32:24 PM 1357 Views
I'll give it a shot - 03/03/2010 08:19:01 PM 1370 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No' - 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM 1407 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:29:51 AM 784 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:31:43 AM 771 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:32:54 AM 697 Views
Re: Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:34:19 AM 738 Views
Ignore, hit 'reply' instead of 'edit' I think *NM* - 04/03/2010 02:36:02 AM 667 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 03:40:15 AM 796 Views
No *NM* - 04/03/2010 04:44:27 AM 729 Views
No, sir *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:20:43 AM 833 Views
Nope. *NM* - 04/03/2010 05:25:10 AM 714 Views
No. *NM* - 04/03/2010 01:54:15 PM 741 Views
no *NM* - 05/03/2010 03:52:07 AM 756 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM 1145 Views
To the roleblocker: - 05/03/2010 01:46:50 AM 1349 Views
That's everyone, Vote: Beetnemesis *NM* - 05/03/2010 04:06:03 AM 760 Views
I think that's everyone. - 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM 1164 Views
I wouldn't jump on fist- he seems like he just rarely posts - 05/03/2010 06:21:34 AM 1463 Views
Also: Someone kill me! Eh, screw it. - 05/03/2010 06:27:29 AM 1410 Views
RBIRL - 05/03/2010 05:17:54 AM 1203 Views
Well, Beet already hammered. - 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM 1259 Views
Hah! It's like a ghost! Or a lame-duck president - 05/03/2010 07:22:42 AM 1300 Views
Not a bad idea - 05/03/2010 08:13:59 AM 1338 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched - 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM 1311 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM* - 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM 740 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM 661 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM* - 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM 809 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED! - 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM 1369 Views
Hmm... tell me more about this robot-heaven - 06/03/2010 09:15:57 PM 1366 Views
In both places, the humans are our slaves - 07/03/2010 06:48:29 PM 1403 Views

Reply to Message