Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
Fox and Ravens Send a noteboard - 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM
Yeah, yeah, yeah. As you can tell, I was in a rush to get out the door.
Yeah, I understand. I really was talking about thhe general inactivity. I did think ranagrande's posts were on the low amount but that's not what I was referring to.
Yeah. Ok. I thought I misunderstood you but I was right. Alright then. I'm going to go through now and find those posts.
Yeah that's good.
Alright so here are some posts I thought to hold some suspicion.
First thing's first. This post is my main argument here. Obviously, my point is that he jumped on it pretty strong. THere was admittedly no evidence other than lack of talking. I scrounged up what I could and put some sauce on it and that was my post of Hieshyn. Then, immediately, probably thinking he could get a quick lynch because of the inactivity (of the game and Hieshyn), he jumped right on and said he would vote for him without giving any explanation.
My second post is a connected to the first.
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/78332/
It's just his vote for FT. He voted when everyone else was. I assumed there was bussing and IIRC, I said as much. He voted very quickly and very late for FT. While this isn't a good stand alone point, it does emphasize my first quote.
Another:
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/77143/
The suspicious part is his last statement here. It was in reference to Kronin saying that he'll be focusing on beet for trying to change our targets if FT turns out to be bad. Why are you so suspicious of Kronin for saying that he'll be focusing on beet? Honestly, to me, it just looks like your trying to make us leery of Kronin because he could be a threat to you. You may have your own interpretation but this is what it says to me.
Another connection to my previous quote:
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/76442/
Italics are the title:
Same deal here. So Blaine hasn't posted yet and you're suspicious of him?? I mean, maybe if you were frustrated or dissapointed or just straight up ready to lynch, but suspicious? I don't see why you have cause for that.
These two following posts are a big one too.
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/76464/
and
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/76641/
First one reads:
And second one:
This second post is in response to a post saying that the miller thing was something FT shouldn't have missed. Basically, I'm saying that his thoughts are quite scattered. He's changing sides here, visibly, which is something DFs tend to do. It's obviously not much but in a day, he went from agreeing with FT back to saying he didn't like what he's saying to eventually voting for him. This wishy washy posting makes me quite leery.
And I think this is enough posts to call it quits. I could probably pull out more but I was able to take some little things out of a few posts. Maybe this is enough to clarify for you.
That I remember, I hadn't said anything about inactivity. Beet may have but I don't remember myself. And if I did, it was not my main point.
LOL, this one looks like it's my mistake "Hmm...well as I said, I thought I made myself pretty clear but yeah...I'm jsut about ready to vote for him if this inactivity gets any worse."
I assumed you were talking about ranagrande there, I take it you just meant inactivty in the sense that the game thread is fairly inactive then. Sorry, it was a bit ambigous.
Yeah, I understand. I really was talking about thhe general inactivity. I did think ranagrande's posts were on the low amount but that's not what I was referring to.
True enough. Sorry I misread your post. I thought you said you would give us some posts and have us say what's specifically strange about them. I'll go through when i have more time and try to pry some stuff out.
NP, I actually was, as I said, thinking about posting them, but it seemed a lengthy process and not really something I should have to do.
Yeah. Ok. I thought I misunderstood you but I was right. Alright then. I'm going to go through now and find those posts.
I'll do this all later today/tonight. I have a class I need to be at now and a test to take after that. I'm not trying to dodge the issue, just to let you know, I wish I could answer these now, specifically.
Take your time, school first, no rush. I just want to make sure we're all on the same page here, which is to say I can't see anything he said or done as particular suspicious, so I need details. I'm not saying he hasn't done anything suspicious, I'm entirely open to the option, but I need to know the specifics. Hopefully if you guys show me, I'll get it, we seem to be on the same page now at least.
Yeah that's good.
Alright so here are some posts I thought to hold some suspicion.
He seems to be as good a candidate as any right now, and the day's discussion does seem to be winding down. I'm not going to vote just yet, as I'd like to see how he responds, but I likely will if nothing else comes up.
First thing's first. This post is my main argument here. Obviously, my point is that he jumped on it pretty strong. THere was admittedly no evidence other than lack of talking. I scrounged up what I could and put some sauce on it and that was my post of Hieshyn. Then, immediately, probably thinking he could get a quick lynch because of the inactivity (of the game and Hieshyn), he jumped right on and said he would vote for him without giving any explanation.
My second post is a connected to the first.
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/78332/
It's just his vote for FT. He voted when everyone else was. I assumed there was bussing and IIRC, I said as much. He voted very quickly and very late for FT. While this isn't a good stand alone point, it does emphasize my first quote.
Another:
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/77143/
This on the other hand... We can't allow ourselves to be so focused on a single target that broadening our horizons should elicit such a negative response, and especially not on Day 1.
More accusations will make the game more active and create more conversation. More conversation will create more opportunity for darkfriends to trip themselves up. Even if we don't recognize it now, that could be invaluable later on.
Also, it's not like the case against F-T will disappear just because someone named a new suspect. I said earlier that my initial response to the Miller roleclaim was to believe him, and I still do for the most part, but I would welcome any evidence or conjecture to the contrary. Again, it is more activity and more conversation, which can only help us.
And now I have to say, if I wasn't suspicious of you before, I am now.
More accusations will make the game more active and create more conversation. More conversation will create more opportunity for darkfriends to trip themselves up. Even if we don't recognize it now, that could be invaluable later on.
Also, it's not like the case against F-T will disappear just because someone named a new suspect. I said earlier that my initial response to the Miller roleclaim was to believe him, and I still do for the most part, but I would welcome any evidence or conjecture to the contrary. Again, it is more activity and more conversation, which can only help us.
And now I have to say, if I wasn't suspicious of you before, I am now.
The suspicious part is his last statement here. It was in reference to Kronin saying that he'll be focusing on beet for trying to change our targets if FT turns out to be bad. Why are you so suspicious of Kronin for saying that he'll be focusing on beet? Honestly, to me, it just looks like your trying to make us leery of Kronin because he could be a threat to you. You may have your own interpretation but this is what it says to me.
Another connection to my previous quote:
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/76442/
Italics are the title:
I think I am most suspicious of Blaine right now
As Katie said, Blaine has yet to post in this game. I'd say we could wait a bit and see if we get a modkill, but Gher has stated that all players are accounted for so he must have messaged him or something.
As Katie said, Blaine has yet to post in this game. I'd say we could wait a bit and see if we get a modkill, but Gher has stated that all players are accounted for so he must have messaged him or something.
Same deal here. So Blaine hasn't posted yet and you're suspicious of him?? I mean, maybe if you were frustrated or dissapointed or just straight up ready to lynch, but suspicious? I don't see why you have cause for that.
These two following posts are a big one too.
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/76464/
and
http://www.readandfindout.com/rpg/messageboard/76641/
First one reads:
That sounds like solid reasoning to me
I think I might be inclined to believe you.
I think I might be inclined to believe you.
And second one:
Yeah it is...
I had stopped paying close attention after my death in the last game too, but I still noticed Yunalesca's Miller claim. I don't really see how F-T could have missed it.
I had stopped paying close attention after my death in the last game too, but I still noticed Yunalesca's Miller claim. I don't really see how F-T could have missed it.
This second post is in response to a post saying that the miller thing was something FT shouldn't have missed. Basically, I'm saying that his thoughts are quite scattered. He's changing sides here, visibly, which is something DFs tend to do. It's obviously not much but in a day, he went from agreeing with FT back to saying he didn't like what he's saying to eventually voting for him. This wishy washy posting makes me quite leery.
And I think this is enough posts to call it quits. I could probably pull out more but I was able to take some little things out of a few posts. Maybe this is enough to clarify for you.
Go Hokies!
CS/CpE. Yay engineering!
CS/CpE. Yay engineering!
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over.
- 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM
3755 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM
1676 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM
1476 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia?
- 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM
1665 Views
I am not Hopper
- 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
1541 Views
- 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
1541 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME
- 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM
1586 Views
A few questions and comments
- 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM
1534 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM
1525 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM
908 Views
You know what?
- 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM
1486 Views
Re: You know what?
- 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM
1452 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM
1477 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM
1490 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM
1583 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM
1503 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement.
- 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
1668 Views
- 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
1668 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family.
- 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM
1623 Views
Hypocop (Table)
- 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM
1588 Views
I investigated Fox and Ravens and found hi to be for the shadow. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 04:46:50 AM
863 Views
Hmmm,
- 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM
1449 Views
We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
- 09/02/2010 06:35:05 AM
1365 Views
Re: We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
- 09/02/2010 07:16:19 AM
1471 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh
- 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM
1315 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM*
- 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM
886 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM
868 Views
I want to throw this out here.
- 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM
1514 Views
What changed your mind? *NM*
- 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
850 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone.
- 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM
1533 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK?
- 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM
1556 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic".
- 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM
1385 Views
That's so arbitrary, though.
- 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM
1298 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante.
- 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM
1550 Views
That seems like good reasoning
- 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM
1470 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning
- 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM
1519 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that
- 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM
1460 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense.
- 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM
1580 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable
- 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM
1398 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism
- 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM
1801 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM*
- 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM
857 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM*
- 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM
878 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM*
- 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM
822 Views
Because we have a SK *NM*
- 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM
798 Views
wait a minute
- 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM
1491 Views
Another thing
- 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM
1579 Views
F-T, I assume
- 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM
1415 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM*
- 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM
850 Views
I don't think it could be a RB
- 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM
1520 Views
We're stalling out a bit
- 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM
1431 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine...
- 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM
1498 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game
- 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM
1663 Views
Yawn...
- 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM
1614 Views
Re: Yawn...
- 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM
1580 Views
Re: Yawn...
- 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM
1523 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself
- 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM
1657 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again.
- 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM
1316 Views
On F-T's accusations against you.
- 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM
1494 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you.
- 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM
1375 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records
- 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
1453 Views
- 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
1453 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one
- 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM
1400 Views
I'm in second? Woo!
- 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM
1462 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod
- 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
1589 Views
- 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
1589 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT.
- 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM
1452 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you
- 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM
1433 Views
Game 1 I remember.
- 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM
1309 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember.
- 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM
1677 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart.
- 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM
1661 Views
Actually...
- 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM
1523 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande
- 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM
1719 Views
Vote: Hieshyn
- 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM
1301 Views
Re: Hieshyn
- 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM
1596 Views
Well, it's less that discussion is winding down, and more that we don't have any new topics
- 15/02/2010 05:48:22 PM
1362 Views
Well this was unexpected.
- 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM
1418 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected.
- 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM
1423 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF
- 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM
1336 Views
If he was the SK
- 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM
1533 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
- 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM
1379 Views
Oh that's right!
- 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM
1401 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
- 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
1491 Views
Lol irony
- 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM
1450 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people
- 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM
1537 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing.
- 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM
1563 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky
- 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM
1649 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky
- 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM
1471 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched
- 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM
1521 Views
Oh, I know it can.
- 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM
1499 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can.
- 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM
1560 Views
It's weird- I've never played Live Mafia, but I imagine it's very different.
- 16/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
1545 Views
I'm still here, I've been busy with studying, and hadn't realized I was gone this long.
- 16/02/2010 06:50:44 AM
1425 Views
Sorry all. Friday thru Monday suddenly got really hectic, I wasn't home much at all.
- 18/02/2010 01:54:02 AM
1457 Views
So, where are we at?
- 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM
1481 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7
- 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM
1520 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
- 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM
1568 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
- 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM
1464 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything
- 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM
1372 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off.
- 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM
1384 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question
- 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM
1408 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question
- 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM
1622 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
- 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM
1406 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
- 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM
1391 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it
- 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM
1422 Views
Alright then.
- 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM
1201 Views
EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM
1572 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM
1543 Views
Naive?
- 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM
1534 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick
- 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM
1513 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like
- 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM
1281 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
- 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM
1383 Views
Re: Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
- 19/02/2010 08:40:47 PM
1374 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM
1358 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM
1363 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN!
- 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM
1424 Views
Hey.
- 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM
1464 Views
Re: Hey.
- 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM
1586 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF
- 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM
1355 Views
Don't put words in my mouth.
- 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM
1568 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM*
- 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM
854 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM*
- 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM
833 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts?
- 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM
1456 Views
I think that
- 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM
1501 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions...
- 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM
1429 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM
1414 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM
1342 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM
1496 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence.
- 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM
1380 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going
- 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM
1444 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
- 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM
1494 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
- 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM
1494 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no
- 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM
1417 Views
After seeing this thread....
- 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM
1330 Views
Go ahead and start one then.
- 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM
1466 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then.
- 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM
1542 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
- 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM
1566 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
- 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM
1606 Views
Alright.
- 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM
1492 Views
Thanks
- 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM
1362 Views
Re: Thanks
- 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM
1339 Views
Ranagrande *NM*
- 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM
814 Views
Really?
- 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM
1485 Views
Re: Thanks
- 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM
1454 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself.
- 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM
1402 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande
- 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM
1488 Views
Not sure I follow
- 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM
1504 Views
Items of note from my NB archive:
- 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM
1588 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here.
- 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM
1628 Views
I'm feeling the same thing.
- 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM
1472 Views
I hadn't even seen Beet's post at the bottom there until after I'd posted this.
- 22/02/2010 07:44:49 PM
1414 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2
- 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM
1516 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis
- 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM
1505 Views
That sounds about right to me.
- 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM
1474 Views
I'll try to, I just may not have the time to. If I do, I'll definately read them all. *NM*
- 23/02/2010 07:05:24 AM
767 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande
- 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM
1508 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande
- 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM
1638 Views
Fair enough
- 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM
1604 Views
Re: Fair enough
- 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM
1426 Views
Maybe I missed it....
- 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM
1554 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it....
- 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM
1418 Views
I will destroy the world
- 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM
1544 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM
736 Views
Ok, that's totally different...
- 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM
1397 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent.
- 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM
1519 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM
733 Views
Yea.... beet's looking worse and worse every time he opens his mouth, so to speak. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 09:00:47 PM
836 Views
No, this is my view:
- 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM
1536 Views
And my view was:
- 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM
1424 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know
- 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM
1480 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM
830 Views
Can I ask why?
- 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM
1433 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn
- 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM
1607 Views
You're right, Isaac.
- 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM
1591 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM*
- 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM
747 Views
I'll agree. Beet has been suspicious, and we havent found enough with ranagrande to continue *NM*
- 26/02/2010 02:00:36 AM
862 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap
- 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM
1509 Views
RBIRL. Had a lot of school stuff, gone for the weekend. Sorry. *NM*
- 27/02/2010 01:05:40 AM
831 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy.
- 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM
1582 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS.
- 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM
1404 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy.
- 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM
1491 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today
- 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM
1512 Views
Interesting.
- 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM
1423 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it
- 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM
1482 Views
Vote: ranagrande
- 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM
1414 Views
What, if anything, has changed?
- 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM
1427 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM*
- 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM
804 Views
A little joke
- 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM
2205 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text)
- 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM
1441 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis
- 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM
1402 Views
my stance on voting
- 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM
1545 Views
Re: my stance on voting
- 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM
1564 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up?
- 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM
1410 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this
- 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM
1325 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days
- 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM
1338 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these.
- 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM
1380 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right.
- 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM
1369 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced
- 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM
1336 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok...
- 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM
1410 Views
All right, let's look at this
- 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM
1515 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely.
- 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM
1555 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case
- 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM
1444 Views
You brought this upon yourself.
- 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM
1397 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No'
- 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM
1590 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay
- 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM
1326 Views
I think that's everyone.
- 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM
1319 Views
Well, Beet already hammered.
- 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM
1424 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched
- 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM
1485 Views
Sorry Beet!
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
825 Views
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
825 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM*
- 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM
746 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM*
- 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM
895 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED!
- 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM
1546 Views


*NM*

*NM*