This new point that ranagrande was the second to last vote doesn't hold up as evidence well either. Napoleon (townie) was 2nd to last for Hopper. Blaine (town) was 2nd to last on day 2 fot beetnemsis (town), day 3 I was the 2nd to last vote, and I was a DF, but I had unvoted to let gher have some more time, and Gher was a cult leader, so bad example.

This returns us to our only not-totally-refuted piece of evidence on him, his leaping on the vote with Fox. Again, he didn't leap, since he didn't vote, but keep in mind that - since we are mentioning last game - he was the first vote (again, he was town) on fistofpainx on day 2 of last game, then unvoted and was vote 2 on yourself, right after FT. So this hardly proves him innocent either but does show that the primary piece of evidence, really the only piece of evidence, is also fairly empty of meaning, since we just saw him do the exact same thing, but even more aggressively, in the very last game as a townie.

At this stage, I feel people are now simply fishing for evidence on him, and it is compunded by everything on him prior to this being mostly refuted. After most of it had been dumped out, gathering more just seems like trying to find things that can be made into proof of guilt, not actually looking for legitimate evidence. If he is lynched and turns up a DF, then it won't be because of this evidence, it will just be a coincidence.