You were abnormally supportive of FT in fashion which indicates really only a few options.
I've repeatedly listed my rationale for believing FT was innocent- it basically boiled down to "Why would a DF make a complex attention-grabbing bluff when he'd be more likely to survive by keeping his head down?"
You repeatedly accused me and others, typically with little basis, and basically always later said you had not accused us, then often did it again.
I think the problem, really, is that you have a list of "anti-town" behaviors in your head, which look fine on paper but don't always match up with reality.
Discussion does NOT equal accusation. Kronin I looked at on day one- when we had zero evidence to go on. I specifically did NOT try to build a case against him today, only mentioning him in little asides at most.
Next I looked at you. Like it or not, you're suspicious- you have a lot of influence on the game due to your numerous posts, and you were the (or "a" if you prefer) driving force behind the FT lynch. In the end, I decided you weren't suspicious enough to accuse.
Finally, ranagrande. At this point the Day had been going on for a LONG time. Fox brought up ranagrande, someone who I'd previous made a post about that said, essentially, that I had no clue what to feel about him. Fox's arguments seemed to make sense, so I got behind them, but I didn't feel near the logical certainty that I've felt with some lynches in other games, or with my defense of FT. Thus, my position of "I'll vote for him unless someone better is put forward."
You have voted for ranagrande, however, unlike Fox, who has himself been a bit wobbly on the matter, you never really presented evidence on him and seem to have gone back and forth on his guilt. Your own objection to your lynching seem at least as applicable to him, yet you seem content to see him lynched.
My objection to my lynching is that people have been saying I've been inconsistent, have anti-town tendencies, and the like. I've been completely consistent- I like to discuss a lot of different possibilities, and then have people comment on them. I DON'T like to commit to a decision unless I'm sure of it.
Changing one's mind isn't a sign of being a DF- it's a sign that, due to new evidence, you've decided you were wrong.
The reason my situation is different from ranagrande's is because we're being accused of two different things. I'm being accused of having too many accusations, or something. That's pretty different from ranagrande's stuff.
Well, obviously. I've been saying that first sentence from the beginning. And yes, I don't want to be lynched, of course. But if you read my long post a couple days back, of the other candidates, I think he's the most likely to be a DF.
Again, none of these really help your case. Since you have previously said you didn't think there was enough evidence to lynch him, and nothing has changed, and ironically ranagrande has not voted for you even though be he town or DF he could do so now with utter impunity, this does not look good.
I said that though there isn't a lot of damning evidence, there's even LESS against everyone else. Including me.
You've contradicted yourself in previous comments on multiple occasions, yes townies do that on accident, make mistakes, occasionally even do it deliberately. Of course, this is why we encourage townies to carefully check messages too, since lots of mistakes by townies leaves DF's room to maneuver.
Like what, exactly? There was the horrific "5.8 instead of 6.0" debacle that I know our spirits are still recovering from. Other than that, I've been completely consistent.
Finally, it's about minimizing potential damage. Townies have a responsibility not just to find the baddies, but to avoid getting lynched themselves. It is vitally important that townies avoid do anything that unnecessarily invites suspicion or justifies a lynch, because in doing so, they increase the odds that they won't be lynched, which betters the odds of lynching a DF. If you are a townie, you have sent up so many signal flares of potential guilt that you can only legitimately be considered anti-town, like a miller or a psychocop, roles which by existing, instead of being vanilla, hurt the town. So even if you are truly town and all those signals were accidents, we have to consider that your death has silver linings. Ultimately, lynching anti-townies benefits the town, if not in this game, then in future ones, as we tend to get less false positives. This is why so many people say you've dug your own hole, prior to this nobody really pushed a substantive case on you, because there was no need, you just kept stringing out more and more rope for yourself. Nor can we say 'ah, then he's town after all' because many DFs have done it on accident and in attempting to get out of their self-dug hole have made things worse for themselves.
See my previous comment about your list of anti-town behaviors. I post a lot, and when the conversation dies down, I try to think of new things to discuss. I did that with Kronin, and I did that with my original ranagrande post. Pretty much all of your complaints can be explained from this behavior, which is how I've always been.
I understand what you're saying about lynching someone with "false positives," but I don't think it's applicable here.
I'm putting this out now because nobody has really given you a specific case to rebut, and because I want to make it clear what my reasoning on this is.
Thanks- that did clear it up some.
If you can rebut these arguments, or give reasonable alternatives, then you will likely live, if you can not, then I think you will be lynched and I don't think we'll have been wrong to do it, even if you turn out innocent.
We must follow the logical chains of evidence and reasoning, right or wrong, but a townie can typically find an alternate clean set of reasoning for their actions, and when they can not, it is invariably because their play has been anti-town, even if their alignment was not. I would discourage anyone from hammering you until you've replied, but please do so quickly, this day has simply gone on too long, and we're unlikely to fault someone for dropping the hammer if you take long.
I guess all I can say is that my actions have not been anti-town. I've encouraged discussion, and ALWAYS posted my motives and reasoning to encourage transparency.
Thanks- that did clear it up some.
If you can rebut these arguments, or give reasonable alternatives, then you will likely live, if you can not, then I think you will be lynched and I don't think we'll have been wrong to do it, even if you turn out innocent.
We must follow the logical chains of evidence and reasoning, right or wrong, but a townie can typically find an alternate clean set of reasoning for their actions, and when they can not, it is invariably because their play has been anti-town, even if their alignment was not. I would discourage anyone from hammering you until you've replied, but please do so quickly, this day has simply gone on too long, and we're unlikely to fault someone for dropping the hammer if you take long.
I guess all I can say is that my actions have not been anti-town. I've encouraged discussion, and ALWAYS posted my motives and reasoning to encourage transparency.
I amuse myself.
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over.
08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM
- 3323 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM
- 1257 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM
- 1028 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia?
08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM
- 1168 Views
I am not Hopper
08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
- 1084 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME
08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM
- 1167 Views
A few questions and comments
08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM
- 1130 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM
- 1084 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM*
09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM
- 677 Views
You know what?
09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM
- 1051 Views
Re: You know what?
09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM
- 1006 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM
- 1043 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM
- 1061 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM
- 1106 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM
- 1058 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement.
09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
- 1220 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family.
09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM
- 1050 Views
Hypocop (Table)
09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM
- 1120 Views
I investigated Fox and Ravens and found hi to be for the shadow. *NM*
09/02/2010 04:46:50 AM
- 588 Views
Hmmm,
09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM
- 1038 Views
We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
09/02/2010 06:35:05 AM
- 973 Views
Re: We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
09/02/2010 07:16:19 AM
- 1078 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh
09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM
- 903 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM*
09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM
- 643 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM*
09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM
- 605 Views
I want to throw this out here.
09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM
- 1069 Views
What changed your mind? *NM*
09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
- 584 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone.
09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM
- 1074 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK?
10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM
- 1094 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic".
10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM
- 947 Views
That's so arbitrary, though.
10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM
- 910 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante.
10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM
- 1130 Views
That seems like good reasoning
10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM
- 1078 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning
10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM
- 1096 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that
10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM
- 1073 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense.
10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM
- 1148 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable
10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM
- 997 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism
10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM
- 1344 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM*
11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM
- 614 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM*
12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM
- 627 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM*
10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM
- 595 Views
Because we have a SK *NM*
10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM
- 548 Views
wait a minute
10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM
- 1049 Views
Another thing
10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM
- 1170 Views
F-T, I assume
10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM
- 997 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM*
10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM
- 628 Views
I don't think it could be a RB
10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM
- 1105 Views
We're stalling out a bit
11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM
- 995 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine...
12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM
- 1084 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game
12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM
- 1228 Views
Yawn...
12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM
- 1195 Views
Re: Yawn...
13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM
- 1158 Views
Re: Yawn...
13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM
- 1076 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself
13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM
- 1185 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again.
14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM
- 910 Views
On F-T's accusations against you.
14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM
- 1061 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you.
14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM
- 998 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records
14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
- 1069 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one
14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM
- 965 Views
I'm in second? Woo!
14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM
- 1044 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod
14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
- 1201 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT.
14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM
- 1033 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you
14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM
- 1047 Views
Game 1 I remember.
15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM
- 909 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember.
15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM
- 1273 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart.
15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM
- 1184 Views
Actually...
15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM
- 1122 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande
12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM
- 1282 Views
Vote: Hieshyn
15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM
- 920 Views
Re: Hieshyn
15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM
- 1171 Views
Well, it's less that discussion is winding down, and more that we don't have any new topics
15/02/2010 05:48:22 PM
- 930 Views
Well this was unexpected.
15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM
- 1010 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected.
15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM
- 994 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF
15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM
- 910 Views
If he was the SK
15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM
- 1155 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM
- 1025 Views
Oh that's right!
15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
- 1085 Views
Lol irony
16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM
- 1033 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people
15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM
- 1103 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing.
16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM
- 1137 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky
16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM
- 1235 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky
16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM
- 1067 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched
16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM
- 1127 Views
Oh, I know it can.
16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM
- 1074 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can.
16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM
- 1157 Views
It's weird- I've never played Live Mafia, but I imagine it's very different.
16/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
- 1161 Views
I'm still here, I've been busy with studying, and hadn't realized I was gone this long.
16/02/2010 06:50:44 AM
- 1058 Views
Sorry all. Friday thru Monday suddenly got really hectic, I wasn't home much at all.
18/02/2010 01:54:02 AM
- 1067 Views
So, where are we at?
18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM
- 1056 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7
18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM
- 1103 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM
- 1188 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM
- 1045 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything
18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM
- 984 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off.
18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM
- 974 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question
18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM
- 987 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question
18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM
- 1152 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM
- 1032 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM
- 1006 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it
19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM
- 1052 Views
Alright then.
19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM
- 829 Views
EBWOP
19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM
- 1097 Views
Re: EBWOP
19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM
- 1117 Views
Naive?
19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM
- 1143 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick
19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM
- 1081 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like
20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM
- 894 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM
- 978 Views
Re: Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
19/02/2010 08:40:47 PM
- 952 Views
Re: EBWOP
19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM
- 966 Views
Re: EBWOP
19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM
- 948 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN!
18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM
- 1012 Views
Hey.
18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM
- 1056 Views
Re: Hey.
18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM
- 1161 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF
18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM
- 962 Views
Don't put words in my mouth.
18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM
- 1109 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM*
18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM
- 626 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM*
18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM
- 600 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts?
18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM
- 1041 Views
I think that
18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM
- 1095 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions...
18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM
- 1001 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM
- 1020 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM
- 958 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM
- 1082 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence.
19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM
- 985 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going
19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM
- 1024 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM
- 1058 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM
- 1109 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no
20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM
- 997 Views
After seeing this thread....
20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM
- 943 Views
Go ahead and start one then.
20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM
- 1038 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then.
20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM
- 1129 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM
- 1148 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM
- 1205 Views
Alright.
20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM
- 1084 Views
Thanks
20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM
- 932 Views
Re: Thanks
20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM
- 953 Views
Ranagrande *NM*
21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM
- 579 Views
Really?
21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM
- 1030 Views
Re: Thanks
21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM
- 1033 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself.
21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM
- 984 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande
21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM
- 1083 Views
Not sure I follow
22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM
- 1091 Views
Items of note from my NB archive:
21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM
- 1158 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here.
22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM
- 1202 Views
I'm feeling the same thing.
22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM
- 1036 Views
I hadn't even seen Beet's post at the bottom there until after I'd posted this.
22/02/2010 07:44:49 PM
- 1052 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2
22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM
- 1073 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis
22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM
- 1080 Views
That sounds about right to me.
22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM
- 1034 Views
I'll try to, I just may not have the time to. If I do, I'll definately read them all. *NM*
23/02/2010 07:05:24 AM
- 533 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande
22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM
- 1112 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande
22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM
- 1191 Views
Fair enough
22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM
- 1107 Views
Re: Fair enough
22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM
- 1012 Views
Maybe I missed it....
22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM
- 1105 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it....
23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM
- 997 Views
I will destroy the world
23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM
- 1121 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM*
24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM
- 493 Views
Ok, that's totally different...
24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM
- 1003 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent.
24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM
- 1075 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM*
24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM
- 516 Views
Yea.... beet's looking worse and worse every time he opens his mouth, so to speak. *NM*
24/02/2010 09:00:47 PM
- 611 Views
No, this is my view:
24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM
- 1132 Views
And my view was:
25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM
- 996 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know
25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM
- 1065 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM
- 604 Views
Can I ask why?
24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM
- 1016 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn
25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM
- 1158 Views
You're right, Isaac.
25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM
- 1162 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM*
25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM
- 516 Views
I'll agree. Beet has been suspicious, and we havent found enough with ranagrande to continue *NM*
26/02/2010 02:00:36 AM
- 630 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap
26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM
- 1086 Views
RBIRL. Had a lot of school stuff, gone for the weekend. Sorry. *NM*
27/02/2010 01:05:40 AM
- 605 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy.
27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM
- 1159 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS.
27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM
- 992 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy.
27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM
- 1070 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today
27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM
- 1075 Views
Interesting.
27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM
- 1031 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it
27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM
- 1040 Views
Vote: ranagrande
27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM
- 1002 Views
What, if anything, has changed?
28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM
- 1036 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM*
28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM
- 555 Views
A little joke
28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM
- 1619 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text)
28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM
- 991 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis
28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM
- 1008 Views
my stance on voting
01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM
- 1142 Views
Re: my stance on voting
01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM
- 1176 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up?
02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM
- 1007 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this
03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM
- 910 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days
03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM
- 898 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these.
03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM
- 973 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right.
03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM
- 966 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced
03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM
- 936 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok...
04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM
- 991 Views
All right, let's look at this
04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM
- 1089 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely.
04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM
- 1133 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case
04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM
- 1052 Views
You brought this upon yourself.
03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM
- 987 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No'
04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM
- 1111 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay
04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM
- 897 Views
I think that's everyone.
05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM
- 901 Views
Well, Beet already hammered.
05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM
- 1022 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched
05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM
- 1085 Views
Sorry Beet! *NM*
06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
- 589 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM*
06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM
- 519 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM*
06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM
- 640 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED!
06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM
- 1116 Views