Your rebuts seems the same as previous ones, you seem to misunderstand me, I am not saying you have not offered counter-arguments, I am saying that those counter arguments offered don't seem valid and consistent with your actions. That even when true they seem indicative of anti-town actions, which are not necessarily those of a DF. A vanilla who rarely posts is anti-town. I feel your actions to be suspicious, and anti-town if you are a townie. I raised the only logical reasons for you to do as you appeared to have done if you were a townie and stated that those were anti-town. It's what you are missing, I am asking for non-anti-town reasons for your actions, not just non-Df ones. When people get lynched it follows the formula of 'I think these actions can be seen as DF-ish, but if not, they certainly seem anti-town'

i.e. "I find his cop claim dubious, but we can't risk losing the cop if we're wrong"

Now, you've not even RC'd, which tends to be the norm for people on the defense, and I've noted that DF's tend to wait till they are asked, but townies under the crosshairs tend to give it without prodding. RCing when it's unneeded is considered pretty anti-town, but not when you're near-lynch, because the assumption is everyone will know your role soon anyway. DF's avoid it as a default because they know a role is a dangerous claim and a vanilla claim is not a major motivation to stop a lynch.

Anyway, the reasoning you've offered up for your actions can be valid, perhaps it is, but even if true it does not show you in a great light. What I was asking for was explanations of the suspicious behavior that couldn't be viewed as either DF-ish or anti-town, you've not provided these.