Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay
Isaac Send a noteboard - 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM
I'll probably tack my vote back on soon, but as soon as we kill beet we'll lose 1 or 2 people to NK. He may be the SK, but the nature of his tactic strongly implies he expected an ally to join him. It would have been nice if a couple players had waited till every 'No' was in before commenting on how we'd be unlikely to trust a RB RC, especially since the two players we were still waiting on are relatively new and probably don't remember the classic Cor Mason claim of game 4 and might have stepped into the trap.
Well, spilled milk, obviously if beetnemsis is a DF, and not a SK, we have a short list for his allies. HE probably has two, if he is, so we may as well to discuss the options for that so the SK can whack them, as opposed to one of us, tonight. If he turns out to be a SK, which is possible considering he might genuinely not have realized that we could and would pursue the RBer thing, then we're back to square one, but we'll have eliminated a whole NK and presumably will go into tomorrow with 6-3 town-DF, which isn't too bad a place to be since we have a lot of info, just most of it around beet's vote won't mean much.
Of course he could be a townie too, but I have to say that I find that option pretty slim now, it will be nice to vote on a more sure deal for a change.
Let us, though, assume beet will a Df - decent odds he's a roleblocker too, all things considered, but we'll see, probably in the next 24 hours.
Who is high-lit as possible allies? Or rather, who should we huddle up around so the cop can check them?
Well, obviously Fistofpainx has a beacon on him right now, and to a lesser degree Bergioyn. Let us instead though look at who almost certainly was not allied to beet.
Myself - I think we may safely assume I am not bussing beetnemesis
Kronin al'Sulc, White Flame of Tar Valon, Fox and Ravens, Darth_Katie - THe other voters for beet, and I do not think any of them bussed him, as his lynch was anything but a certainty even up to L-1, there is some wiggle room for the possibility Fox might have decided to bus, but fairly low.
That leaves us
Bergioyn
Fistofpainx
Hieshyn
Hobo
ranagrande
All right, we can dismiss ranagrande, he is obviously not an ally of beetnemesis. Hobo basically declared his intent to vote for beet, though he didn't vote, so he get's a maybe. Hieshyn was locked onto Fox, but was even when fox was the only other strong supporter of ranagrande, which has been beet's focus, so if Hieshyn was beet's ally, targeting Fox seems a strange move. So he's a 'maybe'.
Breaking this down, and remember all this assumes beetnemesis is a DF, or member of a multi-person faction, not a SK, our list of potential allies for him, in order from most to least is
Fistofpainx
Bergioyn
Hieshyn
Hobo
Fox
Now odds are two of those are DFs, if he is, and when I say 'most to least' I emphasize that there is a pretty big gap between number 1 and number 5. We can also make some good guesses on which of those are unlikely to be allied. Fox and Hieshyn, for instance, are basically mutually exclusive. Bergioyn we just have little data on, and I still feel Hobo is semi-prob-town. So we should expect copping to happen in that area and realistically during the hypocop, if we want to protect our cop, we need huddle up over those five, and don't forget that if one of them dies tonight it doesn't mean the cop might not have checked them, so you should probably pick your target for HC at twilight. I suggest, to make it easy, just roll a normal six sided dice and have fist assigned two numbers, then determine guilt or innocence with a flat coin flip or odds/even roll. We're expecting 2 out 5 baddies, so 50/50 is about right. If your HCer dies, just report their actual alignment, don't switch targets or flip a coin.
Okay, just wanted to outline a suggested battle strategy, obviously this only applies if beet is a DF or cultist, not a lone wolf or somehow actually a townie. If anyone else has any thoughts, nows the time, I'd love to hear from fist before we proceed but I doubt it will change much, so we can either wait and talk a bit longer, or proceed, I don't think we have to worry about a shortage of votes so I won't bother putting mine back on just yet, in case people still want to talk or someone votes just to end talk. Obviously, barring some stunning revelation, we know who I'm voting for.
Well, spilled milk, obviously if beetnemsis is a DF, and not a SK, we have a short list for his allies. HE probably has two, if he is, so we may as well to discuss the options for that so the SK can whack them, as opposed to one of us, tonight. If he turns out to be a SK, which is possible considering he might genuinely not have realized that we could and would pursue the RBer thing, then we're back to square one, but we'll have eliminated a whole NK and presumably will go into tomorrow with 6-3 town-DF, which isn't too bad a place to be since we have a lot of info, just most of it around beet's vote won't mean much.
Of course he could be a townie too, but I have to say that I find that option pretty slim now, it will be nice to vote on a more sure deal for a change.
Let us, though, assume beet will a Df - decent odds he's a roleblocker too, all things considered, but we'll see, probably in the next 24 hours.
Who is high-lit as possible allies? Or rather, who should we huddle up around so the cop can check them?
Well, obviously Fistofpainx has a beacon on him right now, and to a lesser degree Bergioyn. Let us instead though look at who almost certainly was not allied to beet.
Myself - I think we may safely assume I am not bussing beetnemesis
Kronin al'Sulc, White Flame of Tar Valon, Fox and Ravens, Darth_Katie - THe other voters for beet, and I do not think any of them bussed him, as his lynch was anything but a certainty even up to L-1, there is some wiggle room for the possibility Fox might have decided to bus, but fairly low.
That leaves us
Bergioyn
Fistofpainx
Hieshyn
Hobo
ranagrande
All right, we can dismiss ranagrande, he is obviously not an ally of beetnemesis. Hobo basically declared his intent to vote for beet, though he didn't vote, so he get's a maybe. Hieshyn was locked onto Fox, but was even when fox was the only other strong supporter of ranagrande, which has been beet's focus, so if Hieshyn was beet's ally, targeting Fox seems a strange move. So he's a 'maybe'.
Breaking this down, and remember all this assumes beetnemesis is a DF, or member of a multi-person faction, not a SK, our list of potential allies for him, in order from most to least is
Fistofpainx
Bergioyn
Hieshyn
Hobo
Fox
Now odds are two of those are DFs, if he is, and when I say 'most to least' I emphasize that there is a pretty big gap between number 1 and number 5. We can also make some good guesses on which of those are unlikely to be allied. Fox and Hieshyn, for instance, are basically mutually exclusive. Bergioyn we just have little data on, and I still feel Hobo is semi-prob-town. So we should expect copping to happen in that area and realistically during the hypocop, if we want to protect our cop, we need huddle up over those five, and don't forget that if one of them dies tonight it doesn't mean the cop might not have checked them, so you should probably pick your target for HC at twilight. I suggest, to make it easy, just roll a normal six sided dice and have fist assigned two numbers, then determine guilt or innocence with a flat coin flip or odds/even roll. We're expecting 2 out 5 baddies, so 50/50 is about right. If your HCer dies, just report their actual alignment, don't switch targets or flip a coin.
Okay, just wanted to outline a suggested battle strategy, obviously this only applies if beet is a DF or cultist, not a lone wolf or somehow actually a townie. If anyone else has any thoughts, nows the time, I'd love to hear from fist before we proceed but I doubt it will change much, so we can either wait and talk a bit longer, or proceed, I don't think we have to worry about a shortage of votes so I won't bother putting mine back on just yet, in case people still want to talk or someone votes just to end talk. Obviously, barring some stunning revelation, we know who I'm voting for.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2 is over.
- 08/02/2010 06:53:53 PM
3924 Views
Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 08/02/2010 08:53:49 PM
1874 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 08/02/2010 09:28:57 PM
1648 Views
Hey, by the way, are you Mafia?
- 08/02/2010 09:34:46 PM
1836 Views
I am not Hopper
- 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
1741 Views
- 08/02/2010 10:37:55 PM
1741 Views
Maybe I am AWESOME
- 08/02/2010 11:19:48 PM
1761 Views
A few questions and comments
- 08/02/2010 09:29:06 PM
1692 Views
Re: Well, I guess I'll kick off this discussion
- 09/02/2010 02:47:03 AM
1680 Views
RBIRL ... test tomorrow. Probably not going to post tonight. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 12:03:38 AM
1017 Views
You know what?
- 09/02/2010 01:17:52 AM
1658 Views
Re: You know what?
- 09/02/2010 01:34:42 AM
1626 Views
Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 01:57:39 AM
1689 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 02:38:45 AM
1668 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 03:29:32 AM
1752 Views
Re: Heh, inorganic chemistry.
- 09/02/2010 03:36:28 AM
1691 Views
Well thanks for the encouragement.
- 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
1821 Views
- 09/02/2010 04:14:50 AM
1821 Views
Heh, Mafia: Other than the occasional lynching or assassination, we're one big supportive family.
- 09/02/2010 04:24:26 AM
1805 Views
Hypocop (Table)
- 09/02/2010 12:59:06 AM
1769 Views
I investigated Fox and Ravens and found hi to be for the shadow. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 04:46:50 AM
970 Views
Hmmm,
- 09/02/2010 06:18:29 AM
1624 Views
We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
- 09/02/2010 06:35:05 AM
1527 Views
Re: We didn't lose two of our biggest roles. Also- I wonder if there are more roles?
- 09/02/2010 07:16:19 AM
1636 Views
Huh. Oh boy oh
- 09/02/2010 06:39:15 AM
1488 Views
Care to give us your thoughts? *NM*
- 09/02/2010 07:26:09 AM
1003 Views
Well, losing Doc and Deputy same night is bound to cause trouble. Especially losing Doc. *NM*
- 09/02/2010 08:54:49 AM
983 Views
I want to throw this out here.
- 09/02/2010 07:21:04 AM
1700 Views
What changed your mind? *NM*
- 09/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
954 Views
Well, I realized I was the one telling everyone to just vote for someone.
- 09/02/2010 04:56:17 PM
1696 Views
Why is everyone assuming we have a SK?
- 10/02/2010 12:09:47 AM
1726 Views
What tips me off is the "melted plastic".
- 10/02/2010 12:22:56 AM
1553 Views
That's so arbitrary, though.
- 10/02/2010 12:57:09 AM
1498 Views
EBWOP: It's probably not a vigilante.
- 10/02/2010 01:05:57 AM
1713 Views
That seems like good reasoning
- 10/02/2010 01:50:47 AM
1646 Views
Re: That seems like good reasoning
- 10/02/2010 01:58:14 AM
1696 Views
That's a vig rule? I did not know that
- 10/02/2010 08:16:56 PM
1631 Views
Well, it's pretty common sense.
- 10/02/2010 09:09:09 PM
1769 Views
I think he might have been referring to vigilante kills being blockable
- 10/02/2010 09:43:53 PM
1565 Views
As the resident expert on vigilantism
- 10/02/2010 08:04:17 PM
1981 Views
Youre the resident expert on vigilantism? *NM*
- 11/02/2010 11:06:24 PM
973 Views
He was a vig once or twice. *NM*
- 12/02/2010 01:33:57 AM
998 Views
Wait, haven't you proposed an arsonist most games. *NM*
- 10/02/2010 04:37:33 AM
932 Views
Because we have a SK *NM*
- 10/02/2010 05:14:00 AM
923 Views
wait a minute
- 10/02/2010 01:15:32 PM
1674 Views
Another thing
- 10/02/2010 04:42:50 PM
1751 Views
F-T, I assume
- 10/02/2010 05:08:58 PM
1600 Views
Probably, might be a hint at an RB but I doubt it *NM*
- 10/02/2010 06:57:01 PM
962 Views
I don't think it could be a RB
- 10/02/2010 07:47:55 PM
1700 Views
We're stalling out a bit
- 11/02/2010 10:05:09 PM
1612 Views
We could talk about my heroic failure to defend the innocent some more? Fine...
- 12/02/2010 07:12:51 AM
1688 Views
You seem engaged in a very active defense so far this game
- 12/02/2010 09:40:23 PM
1864 Views
Yawn...
- 12/02/2010 11:28:50 PM
1810 Views
Re: Yawn...
- 13/02/2010 12:32:30 AM
1753 Views
Re: Yawn...
- 13/02/2010 01:31:41 AM
1704 Views
He's brought up accusations on himself
- 13/02/2010 02:40:01 AM
1855 Views
Alrighty, let's try this again.
- 14/02/2010 06:38:26 AM
1504 Views
On F-T's accusations against you.
- 14/02/2010 01:54:20 AM
1662 Views
Re: On F-T's accusations against you.
- 14/02/2010 03:43:52 AM
1555 Views
That's right, I am the Breaker of Unbroken Records
- 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
1620 Views
- 14/02/2010 05:56:52 AM
1620 Views
Actually, quite few of my streaks were broken on that one
- 14/02/2010 08:43:09 AM
1585 Views
I'm in second? Woo!
- 14/02/2010 02:46:05 PM
1611 Views
Yep, welcome to being a lightning rod
- 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
1782 Views
- 14/02/2010 09:10:43 PM
1782 Views
I'm not gonna be as targeted as you; I've died a LOT.
- 14/02/2010 11:17:24 PM
1658 Views
Ironically I don't think I've ever killed you
- 14/02/2010 11:56:03 PM
1623 Views
Game 1 I remember.
- 15/02/2010 12:01:21 AM
1490 Views
Re: Game 1 I remember.
- 15/02/2010 12:19:30 AM
1873 Views
Three stalled out over the winter holidays and we had to restart.
- 15/02/2010 01:26:59 AM
1831 Views
Actually...
- 15/02/2010 04:57:50 PM
1691 Views
A second line of thought: ranagrande
- 12/02/2010 07:40:37 AM
1901 Views
Vote: Hieshyn
- 15/02/2010 03:27:04 AM
1497 Views
Re: Hieshyn
- 15/02/2010 12:54:42 PM
1765 Views
Well, it's less that discussion is winding down, and more that we don't have any new topics
- 15/02/2010 05:48:22 PM
1543 Views
Well this was unexpected.
- 15/02/2010 06:07:44 PM
1569 Views
Re: Well this was unexpected.
- 15/02/2010 08:30:57 PM
1604 Views
I think he's saying that he's been quiet because he's busy, not a DF
- 15/02/2010 08:39:53 PM
1501 Views
If he was the SK
- 15/02/2010 07:55:38 PM
1730 Views
Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
- 15/02/2010 08:53:03 PM
1564 Views
Oh that's right!
- 15/02/2010 09:03:40 PM
1568 Views
Re: Game 9 was F-T's Cairhienen Civil War/Succession.
- 15/02/2010 11:54:44 PM
1665 Views
Lol irony
- 16/02/2010 12:16:49 AM
1611 Views
So, it's just because he hasn't been talking much? That fits a lot of people
- 15/02/2010 09:31:02 PM
1708 Views
OK, I'm glad that vote got some discussion flowing.
- 16/02/2010 02:58:55 AM
1729 Views
Ooo sneaky sneaky
- 16/02/2010 03:58:37 AM
1817 Views
Re: Ooo sneaky sneaky
- 16/02/2010 04:25:26 AM
1680 Views
You know doing this sort of thing can get you lynched
- 16/02/2010 04:40:23 AM
1678 Views
Oh, I know it can.
- 16/02/2010 05:23:13 AM
1690 Views
Re: Oh, I know it can.
- 16/02/2010 07:00:53 AM
1758 Views
It's weird- I've never played Live Mafia, but I imagine it's very different.
- 16/02/2010 08:58:09 AM
1731 Views
I'm still here, I've been busy with studying, and hadn't realized I was gone this long.
- 16/02/2010 06:50:44 AM
1603 Views
Sorry all. Friday thru Monday suddenly got really hectic, I wasn't home much at all.
- 18/02/2010 01:54:02 AM
1651 Views
So, where are we at?
- 18/02/2010 02:40:32 AM
1674 Views
EBWOP: Issac's maybe only a 5.5. No, a 5.7
- 18/02/2010 06:58:40 AM
1723 Views
OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
- 18/02/2010 07:08:36 AM
1745 Views
Re: OK so I apparantly lack the technical know-how to reply to myself
- 18/02/2010 07:54:05 AM
1624 Views
Well yeah, all of that is mostly why I haven't been pushing anything
- 18/02/2010 08:51:14 AM
1536 Views
Uggggghhhh...Ok. This post makes me want to vote you off.
- 18/02/2010 03:28:19 PM
1586 Views
You seem to have misunbderstood my question
- 18/02/2010 04:28:47 PM
1610 Views
Re: You seem to have misunbderstood my question
- 18/02/2010 05:10:14 PM
1822 Views
Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
- 18/02/2010 05:25:49 PM
1583 Views
Re: Nice little typo I have there on misundertood, that's gonna be nagging at me for all of Day 2
- 19/02/2010 04:45:25 AM
1542 Views
Thanks, all right let's review it
- 19/02/2010 11:41:19 AM
1595 Views
Alright then.
- 19/02/2010 05:20:39 PM
1384 Views
EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 05:23:06 PM
1742 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 06:53:08 PM
1737 Views
Naive?
- 19/02/2010 07:13:14 PM
1698 Views
Naive or sinister, take your pick
- 19/02/2010 07:29:09 PM
1694 Views
We could go with "arrogant," instead of either of those, if you like
- 20/02/2010 01:59:22 AM
1433 Views
Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
- 19/02/2010 08:26:33 PM
1541 Views
Re: Hmm...well here's something interesting now that you reminded me of that game...
- 19/02/2010 08:40:47 PM
1543 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 08:32:55 PM
1528 Views
Re: EBWOP
- 19/02/2010 08:57:50 PM
1530 Views
Actually, that reminds me. HEY KRONIN!
- 18/02/2010 07:09:39 AM
1598 Views
Hey.
- 18/02/2010 04:09:08 PM
1642 Views
Re: Hey.
- 18/02/2010 05:37:33 PM
1753 Views
FT had no evidence one way or the other if Issac was a DF
- 18/02/2010 05:44:43 PM
1525 Views
Don't put words in my mouth.
- 18/02/2010 06:03:55 PM
1739 Views
Oh no, I know, I know. I'm just saying, FT has no more credibility than any of us *NM*
- 18/02/2010 07:48:58 PM
967 Views
But he IS a damn good player, and his advice, however limited, should be taken into account. *NM*
- 18/02/2010 07:49:58 PM
943 Views
fistofpainx, Do you have any thoughts?
- 18/02/2010 05:46:38 PM
1627 Views
I think that
- 18/02/2010 09:45:56 PM
1662 Views
Well, if my combine the Vote Record with our previous suspicions...
- 18/02/2010 09:48:24 PM
1612 Views
All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 18/02/2010 11:32:07 PM
1582 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 19/02/2010 03:01:45 AM
1500 Views
Re: All right, ranagrande (and everyone else). Why shouldn't we lynch you?
- 19/02/2010 04:07:03 AM
1654 Views
I think you're overestimating the appearance of your own innocence.
- 19/02/2010 05:38:53 AM
1541 Views
Yeah, it's mostly just about getting the conversation going
- 19/02/2010 06:40:17 AM
1638 Views
In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
- 19/02/2010 09:50:16 PM
1689 Views
Re: In response to Fox and Ravens (down here to stop horizontal scroll)
- 19/02/2010 10:22:37 PM
1687 Views
Well, the reason for the prohibition doesn't apply post-game, so I'll go with no
- 20/02/2010 05:07:38 AM
1609 Views
After seeing this thread....
- 20/02/2010 05:53:47 AM
1510 Views
Go ahead and start one then.
- 20/02/2010 06:08:12 AM
1654 Views
Re: Go ahead and start one then.
- 20/02/2010 06:47:23 AM
1739 Views
Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
- 20/02/2010 04:50:29 PM
1735 Views
Re: Isaac, did you say you have Cor's original rules saved somewhere?
- 20/02/2010 05:16:09 PM
1782 Views
Alright.
- 20/02/2010 05:43:51 PM
1671 Views
Thanks
- 20/02/2010 07:48:20 PM
1531 Views
Re: Thanks
- 20/02/2010 10:35:26 PM
1505 Views
Ranagrande *NM*
- 21/02/2010 12:55:29 AM
931 Views
Really?
- 21/02/2010 01:58:24 AM
1648 Views
Re: Thanks
- 21/02/2010 01:57:25 AM
1613 Views
Well, you kind of said it yourself.
- 21/02/2010 07:38:32 PM
1587 Views
I'm purposefully trying to not be so focussed on ranagrande
- 21/02/2010 11:06:40 PM
1679 Views
Not sure I follow
- 22/02/2010 06:49:11 PM
1668 Views
Items of note from my NB archive:
- 21/02/2010 09:37:49 PM
1765 Views
I am kind of confused about what you're doing here.
- 22/02/2010 07:20:49 PM
1834 Views
I'm feeling the same thing.
- 22/02/2010 07:36:46 PM
1644 Views
I hadn't even seen Beet's post at the bottom there until after I'd posted this.
- 22/02/2010 07:44:49 PM
1568 Views
Re: Rafo Mafia 4 Day 2
- 22/02/2010 12:09:20 PM
1648 Views
Alright. Here's a quick synposis
- 22/02/2010 07:54:19 PM
1678 Views
That sounds about right to me.
- 22/02/2010 07:58:29 PM
1659 Views
I'll try to, I just may not have the time to. If I do, I'll definately read them all. *NM*
- 23/02/2010 07:05:24 AM
868 Views
Another minor piece against ranagrande
- 22/02/2010 07:13:44 PM
1677 Views
Re: Another minor piece against ranagrande
- 22/02/2010 08:23:48 PM
1826 Views
Fair enough
- 22/02/2010 08:38:51 PM
1768 Views
Re: Fair enough
- 22/02/2010 09:07:57 PM
1594 Views
Maybe I missed it....
- 22/02/2010 09:26:47 PM
1732 Views
Re: Maybe I missed it....
- 23/02/2010 09:38:23 PM
1579 Views
I will destroy the world
- 23/02/2010 11:17:26 PM
1712 Views
And yet, that's the exact same thing you called me out on yesterday. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 01:07:07 AM
833 Views
Ok, that's totally different...
- 24/02/2010 06:36:00 AM
1576 Views
All that's different is the presumed final intent.
- 24/02/2010 12:36:32 PM
1726 Views
Yeah ... those are pretty much the same. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 03:17:25 PM
847 Views
Yea.... beet's looking worse and worse every time he opens his mouth, so to speak. *NM*
- 24/02/2010 09:00:47 PM
944 Views
No, this is my view:
- 24/02/2010 11:23:25 PM
1698 Views
And my view was:
- 25/02/2010 01:29:13 AM
1582 Views
shrug. I haven't been attacking you today, you know
- 25/02/2010 01:46:39 AM
1637 Views
Vote: Fox and Ravens *NM*
- 24/02/2010 04:51:24 AM
941 Views
Can I ask why?
- 24/02/2010 05:06:22 AM
1607 Views
We're sort of in a holding pattern here, Hieshyn
- 25/02/2010 07:01:23 PM
1772 Views
You're right, Isaac.
- 25/02/2010 08:47:03 PM
1751 Views
Though I presume this was already somewhat obvious, ^Seconded. *NM*
- 25/02/2010 08:56:19 PM
873 Views
I'll agree. Beet has been suspicious, and we havent found enough with ranagrande to continue *NM*
- 26/02/2010 02:00:36 AM
964 Views
At first I thought he was going for a F&R-style trap
- 26/02/2010 01:44:16 AM
1671 Views
RBIRL. Had a lot of school stuff, gone for the weekend. Sorry. *NM*
- 27/02/2010 01:05:40 AM
947 Views
Sorry I've been insanely busy.
- 27/02/2010 03:33:43 AM
1736 Views
This seems a lot like an OMGUS.
- 27/02/2010 07:02:12 AM
1585 Views
Re: Sorry I've been insanely busy.
- 27/02/2010 07:06:39 AM
1660 Views
Okay, let's try to finish off today
- 27/02/2010 07:27:09 PM
1681 Views
Interesting.
- 27/02/2010 09:28:33 PM
1584 Views
I sort of assumed everyone knew where I'm aiming, I've been pretty open about it
- 27/02/2010 09:45:50 PM
1643 Views
Vote: ranagrande
- 27/02/2010 09:12:51 PM
1593 Views
What, if anything, has changed?
- 28/02/2010 03:19:49 AM
1595 Views
Dang, I didn't know you could make text larger. Fancy! *NM*
- 28/02/2010 04:57:28 AM
904 Views
A little joke
- 28/02/2010 05:16:14 AM
2388 Views
Yikes (warning: lots of text)
- 28/02/2010 12:35:16 AM
1627 Views
Guess I'll set up the other camp: Vote: beetnemesis
- 28/02/2010 03:22:49 AM
1549 Views
my stance on voting
- 01/03/2010 03:08:33 AM
1684 Views
Re: my stance on voting
- 01/03/2010 03:21:32 AM
1722 Views
Perhaps a deadline would liven things up?
- 02/03/2010 08:46:35 PM
1601 Views
I hope you all feel really guilty about this
- 03/03/2010 06:22:57 AM
1479 Views
Not likely, we're pretty draconian about lynches these days
- 03/03/2010 09:15:00 AM
1536 Views
..I can and HAVE rebutted these.
- 03/03/2010 05:15:32 PM
1553 Views
EBWOP: I need to start hitting preview to make sure the formatting is right.
- 03/03/2010 05:18:43 PM
1529 Views
I'm sorry, I am not convinced
- 03/03/2010 11:16:36 PM
1509 Views
I figured it'd be meaningless to RC, but ok...
- 04/03/2010 01:54:36 AM
1593 Views
All right, let's look at this
- 04/03/2010 02:06:58 AM
1692 Views
I find this very, very, very, VERY unlikely.
- 04/03/2010 05:25:41 AM
1712 Views
At this point I feel like anything I could say would only hurt my case
- 04/03/2010 06:34:43 AM
1607 Views
You brought this upon yourself.
- 03/03/2010 01:06:58 PM
1574 Views
Are you a Town Roleblocker? (Table) - Summary: All 'No'
- 04/03/2010 02:28:55 AM
1776 Views
Well, I don't think there is much point in further delay
- 04/03/2010 11:44:57 PM
1494 Views
I think that's everyone.
- 05/03/2010 04:39:23 AM
1503 Views
Well, Beet already hammered.
- 05/03/2010 06:44:08 AM
1580 Views
Beetnemesis has been lynched
- 05/03/2010 05:38:05 PM
1671 Views
Sorry Beet!
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
938 Views
*NM*
- 06/03/2010 05:11:56 AM
938 Views
You shall be the only one I don't haunt *NM*
- 06/03/2010 06:29:23 AM
851 Views
Yo, what did I do to you? *NM*
- 06/03/2010 06:47:51 PM
999 Views
I meant of those who lynched me! You shall be EXALTED!
- 06/03/2010 06:52:39 PM
1701 Views


*NM*

*NM*