Active Users:487 Time:16/06/2026 07:39:25 PM
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. nossy Send a noteboard - 05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM
You keep doing it! Female character is fine, female human is fine, but female just on its own? xx(

Really? Who would say "female human?" I'm just surprised, since I didn't realize this was a thing. I mean, I am female, and it wouldn't occur to me to be upset, unless someone said "typical female," or something of that nature. And then, I'd be angry at the stereotype, not the term.


Right there- you're using female correctly. When you say "I am female" you're using female as an adjective. To use it as a noun, it would have to be "I am a female". Doesn't that sound odd? The implied word in that sentence is "human", as in "I am a female human".

Not particularly? I almost wrote "I am a female," so I think of it interchangeably. Either way, you know the human is implied, but that I also happen to self-identify as female.
Reply to message
The Hunger Games gets a ... different kind of review. - 03/04/2012 03:37:39 PM 2492 Views
"Written by a female with femalist themes" - 03/04/2012 04:38:54 PM 1239 Views
Ok, I did and basically it's garbage. *NM* - 03/04/2012 04:53:00 PM 1070 Views
I grant that I haven't read the Hunger Games yet - 03/04/2012 05:10:38 PM 1193 Views
No, it's totally off. *NM* - 03/04/2012 05:39:03 PM 1055 Views
fair enough. like I said, I haven't read it yet. *NM* - 03/04/2012 07:20:34 PM 987 Views
I can only speak for the film, which was not feminist. - 03/04/2012 06:01:18 PM 1156 Views
Where do I start? - 03/04/2012 07:43:18 PM 1160 Views
Hermoine was the most kick ass of the Potter kids. - 04/04/2012 03:08:17 AM 1013 Views
So? Hunger Games has lots of male characters. - 04/04/2012 05:30:21 AM 1067 Views
His racism point... - 04/04/2012 02:32:43 PM 969 Views
Makes me almost wish I knew the source material so I could judge what he is saying - 03/04/2012 10:50:48 PM 1051 Views
Why don't you think the Hunger Games are feminist? - 03/04/2012 11:17:53 PM 1155 Views
Why would I consider it to be femenist? - 04/04/2012 01:51:24 AM 1063 Views
I just don't consider feminism as something that has to be radical. - 04/04/2012 05:42:59 AM 1124 Views
Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 08:22:35 AM 1135 Views
Re: Completely agree with your first paragraph - 04/04/2012 01:43:55 PM 1080 Views
Unfortunately truly ordinary female characters are so rare that the exceptions stand out - 04/04/2012 01:49:16 PM 1109 Views
Fair enough - 04/04/2012 02:33:22 PM 1162 Views
Stop using female as a noun! - 04/04/2012 03:51:13 PM 1045 Views
It's stuff like that that makes you lose cred - 04/04/2012 05:26:24 PM 1104 Views
It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 04/04/2012 07:30:18 PM 1051 Views
I don't think Jens was really using it that way, though - 04/04/2012 07:34:28 PM 967 Views
Thank you! - 04/04/2012 08:03:38 PM 1083 Views
Of course he didn't intend it that way, but that's how it sounds. - 04/04/2012 08:06:03 PM 1068 Views
I understand that, but it's still such a ridiculous thing to get fussed over - 04/04/2012 09:20:01 PM 1111 Views
You are rather exaggerating just how "fussed" anyone did get, you do realize. - 04/04/2012 09:51:22 PM 1027 Views
Her tone was not just "informative". It was accusatory - 04/04/2012 10:17:57 PM 996 Views
Female is perfectly acceptable to use in a medical/clinical setting. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:36:57 PM 1252 Views
so if your problem is people using it disparagingly... - 04/04/2012 10:45:10 PM 975 Views
That's not what I said. - 04/04/2012 10:51:41 PM 1136 Views
I'm going to have to just outright disagree with you then. *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:54:25 PM 1030 Views
If I wanted to be accusatory... - 04/04/2012 11:05:37 PM 1032 Views
Are you a native English speaker, Legolas? (Clarified to preempt possible internet tears) - 06/04/2012 09:29:28 AM 1077 Views
Nope. (edit) - 06/04/2012 07:23:54 PM 1062 Views
Re: Nope. (edit) - 07/04/2012 04:51:30 AM 1128 Views
"Female that"? That's even worse. - 07/04/2012 11:42:00 AM 1001 Views
Ok. - 07/04/2012 03:27:16 PM 1311 Views
Re: It's fairly derogatory as a noun, though, have to agree with Vivien on that one. - 05/04/2012 02:21:21 AM 1074 Views
I think the language difference is really interesting. - 05/04/2012 03:13:03 PM 1101 Views
English is not French, and it's not German. Particularly the connotations of American English words - 06/04/2012 09:39:00 AM 1171 Views
LOL! You don't say... - 06/04/2012 05:06:20 PM 1038 Views
LOL u so mad - 06/04/2012 06:19:28 PM 1051 Views
The prospect of "losing cred" is not going to stop me from speaking my mind. - 04/04/2012 10:30:03 PM 1019 Views
My dear - 09/04/2012 01:07:34 PM 1091 Views
LOL - 09/04/2012 01:57:53 PM 902 Views
guess what, it is a noun. *NM* - 04/04/2012 07:26:39 PM 896 Views
That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 08:19:02 PM 1048 Views
well it's important that you say "female human" - 04/04/2012 09:28:45 PM 1004 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 04/04/2012 10:48:07 PM 1004 Views
wait, so now you're claiming it's a grammatical thing? *NM* - 04/04/2012 10:58:31 PM 1040 Views
No, I have issues with words that begin with the letter f. - 04/04/2012 11:09:45 PM 1046 Views
ooookay then. - 04/04/2012 11:11:23 PM 1094 Views
Re: That's the first time I have ever heard/seen anyone say that. - 05/04/2012 02:08:26 AM 1088 Views
Re: Stop using female as a noun! - 05/04/2012 02:18:47 PM 948 Views
If dislike of the use of female as a noun makes me crazy town, I'm not the only crazy in here. - 05/04/2012 05:59:16 PM 993 Views
For the record, I certainly don't think you're crazy town. - 05/04/2012 07:23:18 PM 1029 Views
Oh, so now we're using 'dislike' instead of 'should'. It's funny how you fell back on that. - 06/04/2012 10:01:59 AM 1043 Views
Fascinating. - 06/04/2012 09:54:47 PM 1045 Views
Re: Fascinating. - 07/04/2012 03:54:26 AM 1048 Views
Just in case (however slim that chance may be) you are genuinely interested in citations/references. - 07/04/2012 05:34:37 AM 1037 Views
What a joke. Do you even know what grammar is? - 07/04/2012 05:57:40 AM 1116 Views
Oh, come off it. This should be the point where you admit to being wrong. - 07/04/2012 12:11:07 PM 969 Views
Sorry, no. Read better. - 07/04/2012 02:23:10 PM 1009 Views
*deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 06:38:08 PM 995 Views
Re: *deletes long reply* Let's focus on the essence here. - 07/04/2012 09:26:34 PM 1157 Views
Aha, we found the problem - 09/04/2012 01:03:35 PM 1105 Views
You're being disingenuous. - 09/04/2012 12:57:38 PM 1022 Views
To be fair - 04/04/2012 02:37:25 PM 1045 Views
You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 01:46:16 PM 1073 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 02:23:33 PM 1013 Views
Re: You didn't see thmovie? She is far from passive - 04/04/2012 07:51:46 PM 1021 Views
This - 05/04/2012 12:20:04 AM 1017 Views
Interesting. I really need to read these books soon, evidently. *NM* - 03/04/2012 10:52:43 PM 1009 Views
I got half way through the review and got bored. - 04/04/2012 03:09:58 AM 1018 Views
And it appears the writer of the article completely missed a central point of the story *spoilers* - 04/04/2012 05:44:40 AM 1059 Views
I think that might be debatable - 05/04/2012 06:59:35 PM 1048 Views
She still made plenty of choices and she did choose to kill. - 05/04/2012 07:13:47 PM 980 Views
The reviewer is kind of full of it, but makes a good point about the character - 04/04/2012 04:22:30 PM 1097 Views
Out of curiosity (this off topic) - 04/04/2012 07:32:25 PM 995 Views
Rachel, of course. - 05/04/2012 12:17:41 AM 1099 Views
Well. Now I've actually seen it. (mild spoilers) - 09/04/2012 12:17:03 AM 1086 Views