This discussion made me think of a possibility. I am embarrassed to even say it b/c it is just a fleeting thing thrown out there and pales in comparison to what you've thought up, but i like to share--even if it's silly, so here it goes---
Thinking about Egwene dying if she doesnt bond Gawyn--what if this is because she is going to suffer an injury that would otherwise be fatal, but if bonded, she can survive by virtue of the benefits of the bond.
i'm thinking on my feet so it's not fleshed out, but this could be a trigger for Gawyn to attack Rand in a rage if he sees it as Rand's fault. But to get that "warder rage" i think his AS would have to actually die, so this is probably nonsense, especially since it isnt well thought out otherwise.
Thinking about Egwene dying if she doesnt bond Gawyn--what if this is because she is going to suffer an injury that would otherwise be fatal, but if bonded, she can survive by virtue of the benefits of the bond.
i'm thinking on my feet so it's not fleshed out, but this could be a trigger for Gawyn to attack Rand in a rage if he sees it as Rand's fault. But to get that "warder rage" i think his AS would have to actually die, so this is probably nonsense, especially since it isnt well thought out otherwise.
My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
- 2412 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
- 1309 Views

Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
- 1435 Views

Of course, I prefer my theory....
03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
- 1165 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
- 1379 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
- 1309 Views

See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
- 1138 Views

In my view
04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
- 1046 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
- 1188 Views
Just disagreeing
04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
- 1151 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
- 1182 Views
Well...
04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
- 1045 Views
This is getting silly
04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
- 1002 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter!
*NM*
04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
- 551 Views

Re: My new 'loony' theory
03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
- 1218 Views
cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
- 1269 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
- 1031 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
- 1121 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
- 1249 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
- 1192 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
- 1134 Views

Yes. What of it? *NM*
05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
- 702 Views
now you're a cool kid again?
*NM*
05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
- 646 Views

It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
- 634 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
- 1206 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
- 1168 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
- 970 Views
Indeed he did.
06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
- 1363 Views
But...
06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
- 1184 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
- 1012 Views
Well...
06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
- 1108 Views
*sigh*
06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
- 1200 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
- 1171 Views

You won't.
06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
- 1125 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
- 1237 Views
Nice theory ...
07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
- 1217 Views
Take two
17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
- 1048 Views
Re: Take two
17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
- 1058 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
- 1110 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
- 1222 Views
Re: Take two
18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
- 1137 Views