I think if you go back and read my response again, you'll find that I already answered your questions.
Umm, maybe I missed it, could you quickly answer it again.
I mean I recall that I talked to you about balefire before and asked you why for example Cadsuane could not just reverse Rand's death by balefiring Gawyn and essentially making it so that Rand had not died in the first place. Cadsuane would do it considering how utterly critical Rand is.
I think you answered that Cadsuane could not balefire Gawyn, because Rand&Gawyn would basically kill eachother and therefore Gawyn would be dead and no longer available for balefiring. Am I right? This is a good enough answer.
The question that has occurred to me is that since Rand KNOWS what balefire is and what it does, if Rand were to be critically injured by Gawyn, WHY would Rand retaliate at that point rather than just hedge his bet and let Gawyn go on living in the hope that Cadsuane or someone will hopefully hunt him down and balefire Gawyn and revive him that way.
The only answer I can see to this is that either
a)Rand is an idiot who ignores the possibility of Balefire "healing" him from Gawyn's attack. I would like to think that after his revelation at Dragonmount he will act smarter in the future and as such not be an idiot.
or
b)Rand and Gawyn will injure each other simultaneously the way Rand did with Ishamael at Falme. But this explanation is weak in that given how sickly&injured Rand is, I don't really believe that Rand is capable of such a feat anymore with someone as skilled with the sword as Gawyn.
So basically, I now wonder why is it that if your theory becomes true, Rand would not just let Gawyn go DESPITE the fact that Gawyn just killed so that Gawyn would still be alive and available for balefiring and therefore Cadsuane could bring Rand back from the dead.
Unless you think that Rand is still physically capable of matching Gawyn enough to kill him the same time that Gawyn returns the favor.
My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 11:09:52 AM
2625 Views
Hehe, yeah, we can also discuss it here...
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1534 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:04:57 PM
1534 Views
Good deal. You're still being prejudiced, though.
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1712 Views
- 03/05/2010 12:20:00 PM
1712 Views
Of course, I prefer my theory....
- 03/05/2010 01:01:07 PM
1400 Views
I suppose it's better than Beslan
- 03/05/2010 01:19:52 PM
1632 Views
He, Beslan being Berelain's man in white was a most brilliant theory!
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1584 Views
- 03/05/2010 01:55:07 PM
1584 Views
See, this is why I am right and you are wrong!
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1405 Views
- 04/05/2010 03:56:31 AM
1405 Views
In my view
- 04/05/2010 10:07:02 AM
1276 Views
Still prejudiced, of course...
- 04/05/2010 10:24:53 AM
1491 Views
Just disagreeing
- 04/05/2010 11:15:44 AM
1387 Views
And repeating yourself. But I have evidence.
- 04/05/2010 12:24:06 PM
1437 Views
Well...
- 04/05/2010 01:10:17 PM
1256 Views
This is getting silly
- 04/05/2010 01:27:56 PM
1222 Views
Yeah, I think as well that we have sufficiently exchanged our views on this matter!
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
655 Views
*NM*
- 04/05/2010 02:18:09 PM
655 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 03/05/2010 04:27:12 PM
1462 Views
cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 04:14:18 AM
1493 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 06:43:01 AM
1281 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 07:32:24 AM
1361 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 08:31:47 AM
1485 Views
Re: cool people change the subject line
- 04/05/2010 09:27:51 AM
1419 Views
I dont claim to be but didnt you say cool people change the subject line?
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1373 Views
- 05/05/2010 02:41:49 AM
1373 Views
Yes. What of it? *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:22:34 AM
814 Views
now you're a cool kid again?
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
763 Views
*NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:23:49 AM
763 Views
It was originally a comment on those who normally dwell here (and also did at Wotmania of course) *NM*
- 05/05/2010 03:25:17 AM
747 Views
Re: My new 'loony' theory
- 04/05/2010 04:44:28 AM
1461 Views
what comments by Brandon, and what flaws?
- 04/05/2010 04:49:29 AM
1408 Views
Gawyn promised not to raise a hand against Rand
- 06/05/2010 12:59:47 AM
1168 Views
Indeed he did.
- 06/05/2010 07:23:44 AM
1617 Views
But...
- 06/05/2010 08:52:04 AM
1415 Views
Just because it makes more sense to you doesn't make it more likely. I have evidence!
- 06/05/2010 09:57:52 AM
1250 Views
Well...
- 06/05/2010 11:12:42 AM
1290 Views
*sigh*
- 06/05/2010 01:41:03 PM
1468 Views
I'm still hoping to dissuade you from this crazy idea!
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1423 Views
- 06/05/2010 02:07:54 PM
1423 Views
You won't.
- 06/05/2010 02:11:42 PM
1337 Views
Gawyn agreed that he would talk with Elayne about this topic
- 06/05/2010 02:32:55 PM
1459 Views
Nice theory ...
- 07/05/2010 06:25:29 PM
1473 Views
Take two
- 17/05/2010 07:33:35 PM
1265 Views
Re: Take two
- 17/05/2010 11:45:08 PM
1283 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 12:52:10 AM
1328 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:35:46 AM
1472 Views
Re: Take two
- 18/05/2010 01:45:24 AM
1371 Views
