Active Users:356 Time:15/05/2024 01:17:57 AM
Interesting. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM
So you read a post, reply to it seventeen hours later without rereading it, based wholly on memory. That would actually explain a lot of the incoherence in your posts, actually. You're right that I never considered that possibility, but then again, you really should reread a post before replying to it. It would keep you from saying a lot of things that are outright wrong. Either way, it is irrelevant because I replied to you after your addendum, which you yourself admit "addressed my edit", therefore you admit that you perpetuated the thread with knowledge of what I had posted in that edit.

Oh, and you accused me of editing my post after you replied, not after you read it.

Your behaviour has been extremely childish throughout. I may have been in a bad mood, but my mood does not explain the decisions you've made.

You claim to not understand my point. That's certainly fair enough. It seems clear to me, but that does not mean that it would be clear to everyone or anyone else. If you had told me that you didn't understand, I could easily have explained it to you further, but instead you continued to rant on an erroneous assumption which made you look like you were ignorant of one of the core storylines in the series.

After I realised the source of the misunderstanding, I brought it up and tried to resolve it, but you shut me down and perpetuated the error. Upon realising this, you could have apologised, as I did to darius_sedai when I realised I was projecting my frustrations with you on someone who didn't deserve it, but instead you tried to shift the blame on me. It might hurt your ego a bit, but in the long run you'd look far better for resolving the situation than trying to dodge responsibility.

My question was an honest one. Why are you doing this, Sidious? I've had enough discussion with you over the years that I expect better from you.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif - 09/05/2010 06:01:33 PM 4956 Views
The "Shrinking of Siuan" after stilling destroyed my initial awe for the Amyrlin positition... - 09/05/2010 07:07:09 PM 989 Views
yeah, but then again ... - 09/05/2010 09:05:36 PM 770 Views
That's total nonsense... - 10/05/2010 08:34:08 AM 1027 Views
No, THAT's total nonsense... - 10/05/2010 09:27:41 AM 891 Views
He raised other issues too - 10/05/2010 11:04:52 AM 894 Views
You seem to deal in bad analogies... - 10/05/2010 05:14:47 PM 912 Views
You've got an irritating manner about you. No wonder you find Aes Sedai so believable. - 10/05/2010 05:53:00 PM 756 Views
Hello Pot. I'm Kettle. - 10/05/2010 06:41:58 PM 782 Views
Hello Kettle. I'm Frying pan *NM* - 11/05/2010 03:43:20 PM 449 Views
Hello Frying pan. I'm Skillet. *NM* - 12/05/2010 11:50:33 PM 465 Views
I usually agree about his manner, but he's right here. - 12/05/2010 04:24:28 AM 857 Views
Re: No, THAT's total nonsense... - 19/05/2010 04:39:07 PM 809 Views
I think you're looking at it the wrong way. - 12/05/2010 06:32:00 AM 815 Views
Both wonderful characters... - 10/05/2010 12:49:44 AM 748 Views
They deserved to be deposed and stilled, I think ... - 10/05/2010 02:47:35 PM 952 Views
"They"? - 10/05/2010 05:16:54 PM 833 Views
Good point ... - 10/05/2010 06:45:52 PM 938 Views
Re: Good point ... - 10/05/2010 06:49:19 PM 851 Views
Re: Good point ... - 11/05/2010 03:43:43 PM 1047 Views
Leanne was not an Overseer - 17/05/2010 02:40:45 AM 859 Views
Re: "They"? - 11/05/2010 02:53:23 PM 884 Views
And she was eventually brought in on the secrets as well... - 12/05/2010 04:38:52 AM 844 Views
I don't know if I agree with this - 11/05/2010 03:19:20 PM 909 Views
The thing is ... - 11/05/2010 09:06:15 PM 828 Views
I get what you are saying, but the quote is from much earlier - 14/05/2010 03:14:17 PM 655 Views
I totally unagree... - 17/05/2010 11:16:50 AM 1045 Views
I like Leane, and respected Siuan until RJ mauled her character - 10/05/2010 05:55:08 PM 807 Views
She was probably the sacrificial lamb in place of Moiraine - 10/05/2010 06:25:39 PM 755 Views
The deck was certainly stacked against Siuan from the very beginning - 11/05/2010 02:44:05 PM 815 Views
This is a main reason I hope Siuan and Leanne get their full strength restored - 11/05/2010 02:25:31 PM 852 Views
I don't really agree - 11/05/2010 05:35:44 PM 795 Views
Re: I don't really agree - 11/05/2010 06:28:48 PM 855 Views
I hope so, as well. - 13/05/2010 05:31:36 PM 804 Views
Re: Character discussion 2 : Siuan Sanche and Leane Sharif - 11/05/2010 05:06:51 PM 942 Views
I'm still annoyed that Siuan is not going to face the consequences of lying about the Reds. - 12/05/2010 05:18:47 AM 839 Views
In Egwene's defense, it would be hypocritical of her to bring that up after profiting from it - 12/05/2010 05:59:57 AM 807 Views
Oh, I never expected Egwene to do something about this. - 12/05/2010 06:12:35 AM 733 Views
Well she's off forging a relationship with the Asha'man - you know, useful stuff? *NM* - 12/05/2010 06:39:04 AM 507 Views
Are you claiming that Pevara was the only woman in the entire Red Ajah to be offended by that lie? *NM* - 12/05/2010 07:15:40 AM 449 Views
The Reds aren't petty - 12/05/2010 04:52:50 PM 692 Views
Are you kidding? - 12/05/2010 06:14:46 PM 826 Views
Unless of course there is truth to it - 17/05/2010 01:50:27 PM 808 Views
There is none. - 17/05/2010 07:09:59 PM 807 Views
Uhhh? - 17/05/2010 08:45:15 PM 720 Views
... - 17/05/2010 11:08:05 PM 850 Views
Re: ... - 18/05/2010 05:25:33 AM 801 Views
Seriously, are you kidding? [EDIT] - 18/05/2010 06:06:01 AM 774 Views
*sigh* - 18/05/2010 12:30:43 PM 848 Views
So, you're not kidding. - 18/05/2010 09:12:27 PM 756 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding. - 18/05/2010 10:25:19 PM 784 Views
Re: So, you're not kidding. - 19/05/2010 12:41:09 AM 889 Views
So, Tsutama... - 19/05/2010 05:29:56 PM 921 Views
Ugh. - 20/05/2010 04:05:43 AM 694 Views
WTF? - 20/05/2010 05:25:42 PM 760 Views
F-T is right - 19/05/2010 12:32:33 AM 867 Views
On the minority thing... - 18/05/2010 04:26:15 PM 807 Views
That's exactly the problem. - 18/05/2010 08:51:45 PM 690 Views
There is no rewriting... - 18/05/2010 08:57:50 PM 673 Views
Re: There is no rewriting... - 18/05/2010 09:21:31 PM 785 Views
Really do you have a quote supporting the fact that there has never been a FD supported by a Red? - 18/05/2010 09:39:31 PM 803 Views
Of course..., I'll provide it as soon as you prove you're not a Nazi serial child rapist. - 18/05/2010 10:06:23 PM 672 Views
why so pissy? - 19/05/2010 03:34:22 PM 812 Views
Sorry. - 20/05/2010 04:16:43 AM 792 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 08:19:13 AM 659 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 08:33:54 AM 832 Views
Re: Sorry. - 20/05/2010 01:26:47 PM 675 Views
Interesting. - 20/05/2010 07:34:45 PM 750 Views
Re: Interesting. - 21/05/2010 05:07:07 AM 761 Views
Re: Interesting. - 21/05/2010 06:28:05 AM 696 Views
LOL - 21/05/2010 02:50:29 PM 723 Views
... - 21/05/2010 08:23:08 PM 906 Views
There may be one explanation... - 13/05/2010 10:04:46 PM 742 Views
That doesn't make sense. - 13/05/2010 10:54:53 PM 858 Views
it was about more than just male channelers - 18/05/2010 09:50:14 PM 834 Views
Yes, that's true. - 18/05/2010 10:07:22 PM 866 Views
I'm also certain the majority of the Red had no clue/involvement - 20/05/2010 10:24:54 PM 743 Views
That's also true. - 20/05/2010 10:29:11 PM 748 Views
Okay I'm leaving you alone ... you clearly don't want to continue - 20/05/2010 10:31:01 PM 759 Views
Why are they lumped together? - 12/05/2010 05:53:51 AM 989 Views
for practical purposes - 12/05/2010 04:50:48 PM 710 Views
AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge. - 12/05/2010 10:50:50 PM 741 Views
Re: AS shrunk after stilling; Siuan and Leane became huge. - 12/05/2010 11:05:17 PM 854 Views
No, I don't think so - 13/05/2010 05:10:03 AM 681 Views
Let's just say we disagree. - 17/05/2010 11:15:31 PM 823 Views
Bah! - 18/05/2010 04:33:40 PM 759 Views
Pfft - 18/05/2010 05:31:16 PM 770 Views
You don't have to intimidate people to manipulate them. - 19/05/2010 12:46:02 AM 617 Views

Reply to Message