Active Users:1136 Time:02/05/2026 07:23:05 AM
I don't agree Sidious Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
Focusing strictly on the One Power Strength questions and answers...


9. Question--In [LoC; 30, To Heal Again - 617] Siuan, after being healed, says to Nynaeve that ‘if she could heal her to half of what she was’ she would be better off. This has led to the perception that Siuan and Leane are less than half their original strength. Yet in [CoT; 19, Surprises – 459] we find out that both women stand several steps above the Aes Sedai minimum strength. This seems problematic—the range of Aes Sedai strength does not appear to be so great as to allow for this. So the question is, did Siuan and Leane in fact lose such a large amount of strength as they appear to have?

Maria Answers--Yes, they did lose a large amount of strength. The range of strength is greater than you think, I believe. At the beginning, Siuan was near the top (and Leane close behind); if she were half the strength she used to be, she’d be in the middle. Instead, she’s somewhere in the lower half, but not absolute rock bottom, nor nearly as low as Daigian Moseneillin.

...

20. Question--Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).

Maria Answers--Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.

21. Question--Of the really strong channelers we know the nature to, all but one have been sparkers. This has led to the belief that sparkers are on average stronger than learners. Is this belief justified?

Maria Answers--No. “Having been born with the inherent spark apparently is not an indicator of strength. There are as many with weak potential who will channel whether they are taught or not as there are of great potential” (from Jim’s notes). The stronger ones just get more attention.

22. Question--Do stronger sparkers stand a better chance of surviving touching the Source unaided?

Maria Answers--It depends on what you mean by “stronger” sparkers. If you mean strength in the One Power, not really. If you mean strength of will or character, perhaps. Jim said of touching the One Power unaided: “if you have not learned some sort of rough control, conscious or not, you will die screaming and writhing in agony.”


The most earth shattering revelation, in my opinion, is Maria's answer to question 20. For YEARS, and it has been years for many of us, we've debated how the curve looked.

This confirms that the bell curve peaks at 50 on a scale of 0 to 100. This means we need to redo ALL of our one power strength estimates.

For example, Moiraine must have 50+ strength, putting people like Elayne/Aviendha/Egwene somewhere around 60+

This also means we have to throw out previous shielding theories (as a measure of one power strength) and create new models for strength based on shielding.

For example, Rand knows that no three regular AS can shield him, but he might be in trouble if one was (I forget which forsaken he names). Anyway, my point is that 3 average Aes Sedai are going to average at least 150 power. Yet, Rand knows 150 power against his sub-100 power will never defeat him. I say sub-100 because when Rand makes the comment about 3 AS shielding him he still grows some after that comment. So when Rand made the comment he was less than full potential.

I need time to digest all the implications of Maria's answers and time to rethink/create a new One Power strength model.

Maybe


Maria said that channeling strength is a bell curve. She did not confirm that it's between 1 and 100, with the peak around 50. I believe it to be a bell curve from levels 1 to 21, with most women having a strength of levels 10-12.

She didn't give any new info. RJ told us years ago that he placed strength on a bell curve.

I believe that the bell curve for strength is much like height. It peaks at 5'5-6', but that doesn't mean that the tallest person is 10' and the shortest 0'. That's just a simple analogy, but I believe strength peaks at level 10-12, which should correspond to a strength of about 10-20 out of a 100. There are women on their side with lower and higher strengths.

If most women peaked at 50 with a maximum strength of 100, RJ would be hard pressed to prove it with his own series. Considering Rand says that no three women could match him unless one of them was close to maximum strength, it's nonsensical to think that two together equal a woman of maximum power. Egwene was well above Amys and Melaine in power in FoH, and Moiraine thought she'd need Aviendha's assistance to stand against a Forsaken. Therefore if RJ did make a system like he claimed with women hovering around an average of 50/100, it will go down as the worst described magic system in history.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount - 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM 2471 Views
Some good RAFOs here - 10/06/2010 07:31:56 PM 1203 Views
Yeah... - 10/06/2010 07:36:55 PM 1113 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking! - 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM 1401 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength... - 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM 1231 Views
See the question again man! - 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM 1207 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman... - 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM 1288 Views
How? - 10/06/2010 07:54:41 PM 1225 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing! - 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM 1228 Views
Think logically for a moment... - 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM 1053 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine? - 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM 1353 Views
Aviendha did in FoH... - 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM 1052 Views
Nope! - 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM 1229 Views
Your quotes are faulty - 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM 1220 Views
In what sense though? - 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM 1236 Views
Forkroot - 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM 1189 Views
Again... later that night? - 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM 1043 Views
What do you mean? - 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM 1201 Views
See below... - 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM 1089 Views
Re: See below... - 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM 1157 Views
I just did. - 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM 1008 Views
Well then we disagree - 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM 1201 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT! - 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM 1033 Views
Ah, you mean later later ... - 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM 1133 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know? - 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM 1223 Views
Yes I know - 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM 1230 Views
I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM 1194 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM 1184 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM 1136 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM 1191 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine? - 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM 1223 Views
Re: Are you sure you're feeling fine? - 10/06/2010 10:29:04 PM 1317 Views
Re: Are you sure you're feeling fine? - 10/06/2010 10:47:00 PM 1106 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe? - 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM 1031 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ! - 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM 1144 Views
In that case, there is no problem... - 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM 1261 Views
But that isn't what the text says... - 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM 988 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then? - 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM 1274 Views
She also says Egwene is Aes Sedai in the same sentence... - 10/06/2010 09:25:16 PM 1257 Views
Yeah, both were RJ - 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM 1103 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate. - 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM 1191 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM 1202 Views
Really? - 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM 1044 Views
Re: Really? - 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM 1191 Views
Re: Really? - 10/06/2010 09:43:41 PM 1058 Views
Re: Really? - 10/06/2010 09:50:23 PM 1207 Views
I haven't refuted? - 10/06/2010 09:53:17 PM 1243 Views
Here's what is clear: - 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM 1098 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove - 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM 1074 Views
Dude... - 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM 1015 Views
At least we agree on one thing - 10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM 1110 Views
No... - 10/06/2010 09:32:06 PM 1081 Views
Re: No... - 10/06/2010 09:43:59 PM 1208 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:57:25 PM 1031 Views
Re: - 10/06/2010 10:12:29 PM 1122 Views
Re: - 10/06/2010 10:34:28 PM 1160 Views
Thought on this - 13/06/2010 01:09:29 PM 1035 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point - 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM 1048 Views
That was kind of my point... - 11/06/2010 12:19:23 PM 769 Views
of course Katerine would have complained - 12/06/2010 12:53:31 PM 1158 Views
The rate forkroot wears off? - 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM 1152 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all! - 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM 1045 Views
Typos, screwed up what I meant - 17/06/2010 02:31:50 AM 1055 Views
You are... - 17/06/2010 04:32:47 AM 1277 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this... - 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM 953 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did. - 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM 1059 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off... - 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM 1060 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield... - 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM 1049 Views
Easy... - 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM 1016 Views
What has that got to do with it? - 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM 1201 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half.. - 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM 1124 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who... - 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM 1237 Views
I can agree with that. - 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM 1005 Views
How can you agree with it? - 10/06/2010 09:13:55 PM 1209 Views
I'm thinking Berowin here... - 10/06/2010 09:16:41 PM 1217 Views
Exactly. - 10/06/2010 09:18:19 PM 1075 Views
... - 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM 1006 Views
Agreed, but... - 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM 1166 Views
Re: Agreed, but... - 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM 960 Views
Good point... - 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM 1171 Views
Or, you know, you're wrong? - 10/06/2010 09:27:55 PM 1051 Views
Re: Good point... - 10/06/2010 09:28:02 PM 1237 Views
We've had this discussion before - 13/06/2010 01:59:34 PM 1176 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list... - 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM 1033 Views
The Bell Curve fits perfectly if one simple fact is true... - 10/06/2010 09:31:31 PM 1001 Views
Or, you know, you can stop misinterpreting Aviendha... - 10/06/2010 09:40:05 PM 1121 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense - 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM 977 Views
Uhhh? - 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM 990 Views
Re: Uhhh? - 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM 976 Views
DUDE! - 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM 1002 Views
Re: DUDE! - 10/06/2010 10:09:11 PM 973 Views
I explained... - 10/06/2010 10:27:44 PM 994 Views
Re: I explained... - 10/06/2010 10:45:58 PM 1156 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily... - 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM 1646 Views
That's fairly simple, actually... - 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM 1222 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai... - 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM 1203 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM* - 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM 566 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right... - 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM 1289 Views
You are making a couple of mistakes - 13/06/2010 02:28:41 PM 1117 Views
You're missing an important point... - 14/06/2010 11:10:55 PM 1083 Views
Yes, what do you mean? You are actually proving our point... - 10/06/2010 08:10:50 PM 954 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages... - 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM 1028 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them... - 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM 1042 Views
That makes no sense whatsoever... - 10/06/2010 08:06:53 PM 1016 Views
Simply this... - 10/06/2010 08:13:42 PM 1046 Views
Very poor evidence - 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM 1173 Views
No it isn't... - 10/06/2010 08:18:09 PM 1118 Views
Re: No it isn't... - 10/06/2010 08:32:17 PM 1184 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined - 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM 1106 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined... - 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM 1146 Views
Here's the problem with that... - 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM 1013 Views
Linked circles are more effective than individual channelers... - 11/06/2010 01:57:43 PM 1123 Views
That much stronger? - 14/06/2010 11:06:18 PM 1180 Views
On this we agree. - 13/06/2010 02:34:45 PM 985 Views
I think you are misreading her. - 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM 995 Views
Bingo *NM* - 10/06/2010 07:51:29 PM 664 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM* - 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM 608 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. - 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM 1202 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals. - 11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM 1063 Views
I don't agree - 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM 1046 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you. - 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM 1237 Views
Hmm... - 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM 967 Views
Because of the question to which she responded... - 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM 972 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded... - 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM 1134 Views
Without contradicting the latter... - 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM 1038 Views
Ah well - 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM 1012 Views
Which is even more evidence... - 10/06/2010 08:23:28 PM 1128 Views
Dude - 10/06/2010 08:30:57 PM 1199 Views
It isn't omission - 14/06/2010 10:54:47 PM 1151 Views
omg not this again *NM* - 10/06/2010 07:52:26 PM 1133 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified! - 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM 1230 Views
Nope... - 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM 1103 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50? - 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM 1134 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55? - 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM 996 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys! - 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM 935 Views
Amys can't hold her properly - 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM 969 Views
What about later that night? - 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM 991 Views
No she didn't - 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM 1110 Views
No she didn't what? - 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM 1155 Views
Re: No she didn't what? - 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM 1000 Views
Re: No she didn't what? - 17/06/2010 06:02:57 PM 1125 Views
you are arguing in a circle - 17/06/2010 06:31:19 PM 1478 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale? - 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM 1096 Views
That's simple... - 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM 1083 Views
Re: That's simple... - 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM 1035 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it. - 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM 1216 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body. - 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM 1064 Views
But they didn't look alike anyway. *NM* - 10/06/2010 08:59:35 PM 658 Views
Eh, yeah. - 12/06/2010 08:24:10 PM 1008 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new - 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM 1164 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before - 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM 1248 Views
They RAFO way too much. - 11/06/2010 12:25:56 AM 982 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing - 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM 1001 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing... - 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM 1264 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second... - 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM 1019 Views
That still proves my point... - 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM 1189 Views
Re: That still proves my point... - 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM 1048 Views
Then why... - 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM 1138 Views
Re: Then why... - 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM 1021 Views
God, what stupidity! - 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM 992 Views
Re: God, what stupidity! - 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM 1097 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100. - 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM 1035 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100. - 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM 1330 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility... - 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM 1178 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations. - 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM 1112 Views
You're pretty much agreeing with me, you know? - 11/06/2010 12:32:44 PM 1090 Views
Yes. - 14/06/2010 10:31:00 PM 1183 Views
Re: Just to make things clear on the strength thing... - 14/06/2010 11:21:31 PM 1378 Views
Huh? - 14/06/2010 11:48:43 PM 971 Views
Also interesting... - 10/06/2010 09:38:27 PM 1127 Views
I'm even more confused (parallel worlds and the Pattern) - 10/06/2010 09:48:17 PM 1112 Views
Nah,... - 11/06/2010 11:38:20 AM 1077 Views
Fascinating! - 13/06/2010 02:30:42 AM 1189 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off. - 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM 1080 Views
I think she's saving that info for her WoT Encyclopedia. - 11/06/2010 12:54:38 AM 1147 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off. - 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM 1181 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off. - 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM 1159 Views
I agree - 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM 1246 Views
Re: I agree - 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM 1021 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out" - 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM 1071 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM* - 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM 585 Views
Actually she said "No"... *NM* - 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM 685 Views
I agree with Jack and Sidious and not with you. - 11/06/2010 03:20:30 PM 1163 Views
Well, on the Thom question... - 11/06/2010 08:25:09 AM 1033 Views
Yeah - 11/06/2010 08:26:33 AM 1135 Views
Re: Yeah - 15/06/2010 12:25:21 AM 996 Views
Eh, practically useless. - 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM 1003 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM* - 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM 552 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though. - 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM 1588 Views

Reply to Message