Because you're being particularly obtuse. For instance...
In other words, you think that the strength of the original shield is important. Well, I don't think so, and I've never believed that.
So, why is it that you need a full circle of 13 to shield Rand, but only six to hold him? Believe what you will, but the text has made it abundantly clear that fewer people (and thus less strength) is needed to maintain a shield once more people (and thus more strength) have actually made it.
I don't think 13 shielded her. But I'm dead certain two did not, and cannot shield her, if we stick to your list.
I'm not sure of your contention here.
Falion (15) + Ispan (15) = 30.
Held Nynaeve, but lost in dueling.
They lost because another channeler got involved (one or two of the Kin). Before they did get involved, Nynaeve was unable to do anything, because they had her shielded!
But if Ispan and Falion can shield Nynaeve (who needs the help of others to escape), then Melaine and Amys should be able to easily shield Egwene, who is weaker than Nynaeve. Which doesn't add up at all.
I mean she commented on his power before he used it in the treehouse. I don't know what she's based her observations on long-term, but there's no proof that it's influenced by his angreal. More likely she's still thinking about when he defeated she and Elayne.
Of course she's influenced by the angreal. Why shouldn't she be?
Lol, but there have been what... 20 male channelers in the last decade and how many hundreds of Reds? Master shielders... I'd be surprised. Not a bad theory, but not proven in the slightest.
So what if there were only 20? More of the Aes Sedai were involved. It wasn't a one on one.
Thing is, the Aes Sedai probably do study shielding because they need to be good at it to defeat male channelers. You don't need one in front of you to practice.
But the WO have never had to shield men, or women even. So it isn't a stretch to say they are worse at it than AS.
In other words, you think that the strength of the original shield is important. Well, I don't think so, and I've never believed that.
So, why is it that you need a full circle of 13 to shield Rand, but only six to hold him? Believe what you will, but the text has made it abundantly clear that fewer people (and thus less strength) is needed to maintain a shield once more people (and thus more strength) have actually made it.
I think that the power that's put into maintaining the shield is what's of prime importance. Do you think that 13 shielded Semirhage initially, because I'm pretty sure those two AS would have merely taken over Cadsuane's initial shield.
I don't think 13 shielded her. But I'm dead certain two did not, and cannot shield her, if we stick to your list.
I'm not sure of your contention here.
Falion (15) + Ispan (15) = 30.
Held Nynaeve, but lost in dueling.
They lost because another channeler got involved (one or two of the Kin). Before they did get involved, Nynaeve was unable to do anything, because they had her shielded!
Amys (25) + Melaine (20) < Egwene (50)
Anyway that's what I thought last time I thought about those scenes.
Anyway that's what I thought last time I thought about those scenes.
But if Ispan and Falion can shield Nynaeve (who needs the help of others to escape), then Melaine and Amys should be able to easily shield Egwene, who is weaker than Nynaeve. Which doesn't add up at all.
I mean she commented on his power before he used it in the treehouse. I don't know what she's based her observations on long-term, but there's no proof that it's influenced by his angreal. More likely she's still thinking about when he defeated she and Elayne.
Of course she's influenced by the angreal. Why shouldn't she be?
Lol, but there have been what... 20 male channelers in the last decade and how many hundreds of Reds? Master shielders... I'd be surprised. Not a bad theory, but not proven in the slightest.
So what if there were only 20? More of the Aes Sedai were involved. It wasn't a one on one.
Thing is, the Aes Sedai probably do study shielding because they need to be good at it to defeat male channelers. You don't need one in front of you to practice.
But the WO have never had to shield men, or women even. So it isn't a stretch to say they are worse at it than AS.
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
- 2333 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
- 1270 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
- 1117 Views
See the question again man!
10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
- 1089 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
- 1185 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
- 1120 Views

Think logically for a moment...
10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
- 944 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
- 1241 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
- 927 Views
Nope!
10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
- 1102 Views
Your quotes are faulty
10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
- 1111 Views
In what sense though?
10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
- 1097 Views
Forkroot
10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
- 1055 Views
Again... later that night?
10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
- 912 Views
What do you mean?
10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
- 1094 Views
See below...
10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
- 972 Views
Re: See below...
10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
- 1041 Views
I just did.
10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
- 878 Views
Well then we disagree
10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
- 1088 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
- 914 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
- 1016 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
- 1109 Views
Yes I know
10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
- 1113 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
- 1089 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
- 1083 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
- 1019 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
- 1059 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
- 1109 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
- 928 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
- 1013 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
- 1134 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
- 883 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
- 1125 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
- 994 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
- 1089 Views
10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
- 1083 Views

Really?
10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
- 947 Views
Re: Really?
10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
- 1049 Views
Here's what is clear:
10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
- 989 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
- 974 Views
Dude...
10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
- 883 Views
At least we agree on one thing
10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM
- 995 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
- 819 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
- 920 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
- 1036 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
- 943 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
- 827 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
- 944 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
- 929 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
- 938 Views
Easy...
10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
- 904 Views
What has that got to do with it?
10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
- 1091 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
- 1004 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
- 1131 Views
I can agree with that.
10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
- 892 Views
...
10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
- 885 Views
Agreed, but...
10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
- 1045 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
- 848 Views
Good point...
10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
- 1059 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
- 922 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
- 867 Views
Uhhh?
10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
- 867 Views
Re: Uhhh?
10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
- 867 Views
DUDE!
10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
- 898 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
- 1534 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
- 1118 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
- 1070 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
- 516 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
- 1137 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
- 911 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
- 929 Views
Very poor evidence
10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
- 1048 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
- 995 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
- 1040 Views
Here's the problem with that...
11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
- 901 Views
I think you are misreading her.
10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
- 866 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
- 553 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
- 1096 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
- 931 Views
I don't agree
10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
- 913 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
- 1116 Views
Hmm...
10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
- 855 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
- 861 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
- 1019 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
- 900 Views
Ah well
10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
- 893 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
- 1124 Views
Nope...
10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
- 982 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
- 1016 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
- 879 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
- 823 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
- 856 Views
What about later that night?
10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
- 861 Views
No she didn't
16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
- 980 Views
No she didn't what?
16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
- 1029 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
- 869 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
- 990 Views
That's simple...
16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
- 940 Views
Re: That's simple...
16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
- 897 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
- 1083 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
- 933 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
- 1061 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
- 1145 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
- 892 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
- 1170 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
- 901 Views
That still proves my point...
10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
- 1070 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
- 943 Views
Then why...
10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
- 1024 Views
Re: Then why...
10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
- 903 Views
God, what stupidity!
10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
- 887 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
- 991 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
- 936 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
- 1219 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
- 1059 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
- 979 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
- 968 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
- 1074 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
- 1009 Views
I agree
11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
- 1120 Views
Re: I agree
12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
- 900 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
- 941 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
- 532 Views
Actually she said "No"...
*NM*
13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
- 626 Views

I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
- 948 Views
Eh, practically useless.
14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
- 892 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
- 497 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
- 1472 Views