Active Users:371 Time:17/09/2025 09:14:53 PM
how do you get there from this? darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
***Brandon*** Re: Will we see Rand in the next book? YES. The book will not be a 100% flash-back like Bk 10. There will be a little bit of catch-up for Perrin, but Egwene and Rand both have large parts too.

***Brandon*** Thing is, Elayne was way ahead of everyone else in her plotline. (Meaning what she needed to get done.) And so, with great regret, I moved her to TofM.

***Brandon*** Re: Is Rand up to date with Elayne. To be honest, Luckers, I'd have to go look at my timeline. I'm pretty sure Rand was at June (our world months) at the end of TGS. Perrin ended at beginning of April. Elayne...grrr Can't remember. But Rand/Egwene are in sync with one another as of the end of that book. I think Elayne is just a tad behind.


Makes it yet less likely that there will be an on-screen Graendal flashback, possibly meeting Aran'gar, from before Graendal's death (as some believe might happen, because it would be "cool", and otherwise Graendal couldn't reveal in her PoV that she killed Asmo, since RJ wanted to reveal it in the killer's PoV...).

Graendal was a part of Rand's plot- and timeline, which is basically up to date; the same applies to Aran'gar in Egwene's plotline, which was also sufficiently advanced in TGS. No reason to suddenly jump back in the respective timelines regarding these two Forsaken (though Aran'gar might think in her next PoV about a last meeting with Graendal).


he says Rand won't have flashback time. Nothing to indicate that Graendal won't be shown this way.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2095 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1234 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1079 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1012 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1042 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 987 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 895 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1009 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 986 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 885 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 856 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 819 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1022 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 789 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 943 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 875 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 910 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 813 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 817 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 872 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1031 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 803 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 922 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1114 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 837 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1027 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 953 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1021 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 908 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1010 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 838 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1050 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 908 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 871 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 997 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 918 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 996 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 407 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 726 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 854 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 891 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 850 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 805 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 928 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 939 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 978 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1060 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1033 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 909 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 915 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 830 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 902 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 795 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 850 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 898 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 866 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 970 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 956 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1000 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 787 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 798 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 938 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 899 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1068 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 855 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 438 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 977 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 841 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 863 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 979 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 775 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 857 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1090 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 797 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 917 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 943 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 865 Views

Reply to Message