Active Users:746 Time:18/12/2025 01:51:30 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Etzel Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM
Such a flashback device with a dead character never happened in the books before. It's the same as stating that it is likely that Semirhage, Elza, the BA in Caemlyn or any other dead characters will yet get a revealing scene in ToM where they chat about something. Completely absurd and also contrary to what BS said on this topic.

If there will be more info about Graendal it will come in the PoV from other characters, like fellow Forsaken or SH (or BS will reveal in in a Q&A). That is the way it is always done in the series, if a character died, and just makes the most sense.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount Skeeve the Great - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2133 Views
This... Etzel - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1267 Views
how do you get there from this? darius_sedai - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1113 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: beetnemesis - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1046 Views
Because... Etzel - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1095 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan newyorkersedai - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1025 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 Rurouni_Kenshin - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 940 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. Etzel - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1051 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1025 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer dacole - 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM 989 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM 1009 Views
No... Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 922 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 890 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* Etzel - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 852 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1052 Views
Again... Etzel - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 816 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 981 Views
The point is... Etzel - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 925 Views
that is 100% your interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 964 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 871 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 878 Views
As far as we know... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 930 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1088 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 836 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 955 Views
We will see... *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1151 Views
Indeed Sidious - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 865 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1060 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong dacole - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM 949 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM 1136 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Sidious - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 990 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Etzel - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1059 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 945 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1045 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 879 Views
where do you get this stuff from? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1085 Views
Eh, no Etzel - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 950 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 926 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1037 Views
pure interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 951 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1028 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 426 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 767 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 898 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Etzel - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 924 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 886 Views
IMO... Etzel - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 852 Views
And... Etzel - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 969 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 972 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1029 Views
not really darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1110 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1090 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 945 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 954 Views
Ok... Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 856 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 931 Views
I also just said that... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 829 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 887 Views
But we never... Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 947 Views
Re: But we never... Datakim - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 901 Views
I think Etzel - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1003 Views
Re: I think Datakim - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 991 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM 911 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true. Logain - 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM 1058 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM 1006 Views
Because some people can't read... DomA - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1061 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 817 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 839 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM 1044 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* RandAllThor - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 970 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 931 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base Logain - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1122 Views
hrmm, not necessarily Kieran - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 891 Views
I agree. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 457 Views
Uh... TaskmasterJack - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1012 Views
or "can't" because ... Shishka - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 875 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... TaskmasterJack - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 890 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1019 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous! RandAllThor - 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM 875 Views
Perrin catch-up? Comet Sedai - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 817 Views
We will get it on screen Deadsy - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 888 Views
On Mat's "death" Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1131 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" Datakim - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 845 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 969 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 979 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! Mats imaginary friend - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 904 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes