you keep trotting this point out like it matters
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM
Such a flashback device with a dead character never happened in the books before. It's the same as stating that it is likely that Semirhage, Elza, the BA in Caemlyn or any other dead characters will yet get a revealing scene in ToM where they chat about something. Completely absurd and also contrary to what BS said on this topic.
If there will be more info about Graendal it will come in the PoV from other characters, like fellow Forsaken or SH (or BS will reveal in in a Q&A). That is the way it is always done in the series, if a character died, and just makes the most sense.
If there will be more info about Graendal it will come in the PoV from other characters, like fellow Forsaken or SH (or BS will reveal in in a Q&A). That is the way it is always done in the series, if a character died, and just makes the most sense.
In the end only the author can decide what is necessary for the plot. Are you going to write a complaint card if Graendal is seen in ToM?
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount
- 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM
2170 Views
This...
- 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM
1303 Views
how do you get there from this?
- 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
1142 Views
Because...
- 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
1127 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM
1056 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM
1029 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved
- 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM
1042 Views
No...
- 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
962 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok
- 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM
925 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM*
- 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM
889 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1097 Views
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1097 Views
Again...
- 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM
848 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal
- 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM
1009 Views
The point is...
- 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM
962 Views
that is 100% your interpretation
- 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM
1002 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation.
- 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM
915 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line
- 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
918 Views
As far as we know...
- 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM
978 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved
- 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM
1127 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines...
- 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM
875 Views
Indeed
- 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM
898 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM
1098 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong
- 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
983 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear.
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1178 Views
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1178 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM
1026 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM
1097 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters
- 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM
978 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!!
- 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM
1084 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos!
- 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM
918 Views
where do you get this stuff from?
- 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM
1119 Views
Eh, no
- 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM
987 Views
I disagree
- 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM
967 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar
- 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM
1078 Views
pure interpretation
- 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM
979 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM*
- 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM
1062 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM*
- 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM
440 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM
932 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM
959 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM
919 Views
And...
- 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM
999 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she
- 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM
1000 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR...
- 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM
1062 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said).
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
976 Views
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
976 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen
- 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM
998 Views
Ok...
- 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM
889 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM
921 Views
But we never...
- 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM
980 Views
Re: But we never...
- 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM
929 Views
I think
- 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM
1033 Views
Re: I think
- 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM
1026 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM
940 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
- 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
1094 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM
1043 Views
Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM
1103 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM
847 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM
876 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age
- 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM
1083 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM*
- 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM
1003 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base
- 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM
1162 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous!
- 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM
906 Views
On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM
1161 Views
Re: On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM
881 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A!
- 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM
936 Views

