I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
If there is such a urgent need to reveal further informations on Graendal's plans and deeds, it makes more sense that it will be revealed in the PoV of another Forsaken or SH without jumping back in Graendal's timeline, which ended in TGS, and not bring back a dead character.
Personally, I think it's absolutely clear that Graendal died of course. BS simply doesn't admit it yet, to keep some people a bit guessing.
Personally, I think it's absolutely clear that Graendal died of course. BS simply doesn't admit it yet, to keep some people a bit guessing.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that just because Graendal likely died in Rands timeline that she won't appear in Perrin or Mat's timeline prior to her death.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that Graendal WILL appear, because as far as we know she was concentrated on Arad Doman and Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders. There is also absolutely no indication in Perrin's or Mat's timeline, which were advanced in TGS, that Graendal played any part there.
As often said, it never happened before that a character, who died in a specific timeline, suddenly appears again in the next book in another timeline before the death. It would likely confuse many readers and is not necessary (BS also told once on his homepage that he doesn't like such flashbacks). You can naturally better advance the plot/timeline and avoid any confusion, if you simply include e.g. an Aran'gar PoV, where she muses about Graendal, her death and how Aran'gar will go one now.
For these reasons it's highly unlikely that Graendal will have another PoV yet, if she died in TGS, like also Sammael, Osan'gar or any other character never got another PoV after their death to give certain informations.
What about Noal Charin? he was almost certainly involved with Graendal at some point.
Face it you are making excuses for there to be no Graendal involvement solely because you are worried that if she crops up she'll finally admit to having killed Asmo.
And even if Noal was linked to Graendal in the past, nothing indicates that she has to appear in ToM to talk with Noal.
you keep insisting that she's somehow tied directly to Rand and only Rand... I don't think that is the case. She's got her fingers in all kinds of plots and could easily be shown involved with any number of situations ... hell it's not even inconceivable that she is behind the Borderlanders!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount
- 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM
2132 Views
This...
- 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM
1266 Views
how do you get there from this?
- 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
1112 Views
Because...
- 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
1095 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM
1025 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM
988 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved
- 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM
1008 Views
No...
- 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
922 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok
- 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM
890 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM*
- 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM
851 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1052 Views
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1052 Views
Again...
- 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM
816 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal
- 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM
980 Views
The point is...
- 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM
925 Views
that is 100% your interpretation
- 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM
963 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation.
- 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM
871 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line
- 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
878 Views
As far as we know...
- 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM
930 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved
- 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM
1087 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines...
- 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM
836 Views
Indeed
- 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM
865 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM
1059 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong
- 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
949 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear.
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1136 Views
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1136 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM
989 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM
1058 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters
- 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM
944 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!!
- 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM
1045 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos!
- 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM
879 Views
where do you get this stuff from?
- 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM
1085 Views
Eh, no
- 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM
950 Views
I disagree
- 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM
925 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar
- 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM
1037 Views
pure interpretation
- 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM
951 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM*
- 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM
1027 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM*
- 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM
426 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM
898 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM
924 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM
886 Views
And...
- 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM
969 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she
- 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM
972 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR...
- 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM
1029 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said).
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
944 Views
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
944 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen
- 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM
954 Views
Ok...
- 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM
855 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM
886 Views
But we never...
- 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM
947 Views
Re: But we never...
- 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM
901 Views
I think
- 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM
1002 Views
Re: I think
- 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM
991 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM
911 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
- 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
1058 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM
1005 Views
Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM
1060 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM
817 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM
838 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age
- 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM
1044 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM*
- 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM
970 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base
- 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM
1121 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous!
- 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM
875 Views
On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM
1131 Views
Re: On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM
844 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A!
- 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM
904 Views

