Active Users:529 Time:04/03/2026 06:45:54 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... Etzel Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM
With Aran'gar or Moridin's pets, besides being informed about what they are doing at the moment (Graendal doesn't even know in TGS that Aran'gar already left the Rebels for several days; it's possible that Aran'gar got another secret task by SH).

And as said, even if Graendal were, that doesn't mean that she would likely appear again in ToM. It was often the case in the books that a Forsaken had several potential plots or confrontations in the future, but due to the sudden death of this Forsaken those things became void.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount Skeeve the Great - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2170 Views
This... Etzel - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1303 Views
how do you get there from this? darius_sedai - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1142 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: beetnemesis - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 1080 Views
Because... Etzel - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 1127 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan newyorkersedai - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 1065 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 Rurouni_Kenshin - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 980 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. Etzel - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 1083 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 1056 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer dacole - 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM 1030 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM 1042 Views
No... Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 963 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 926 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* Etzel - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 889 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 1097 Views
Again... Etzel - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 848 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 1009 Views
The point is... Etzel - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 962 Views
that is 100% your interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 1002 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 915 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 918 Views
As far as we know... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 978 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 1128 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 876 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 988 Views
We will see... *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1188 Views
Indeed Sidious - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 898 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 1098 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong dacole - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM 983 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM 1178 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Sidious - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 1026 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Etzel - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 1097 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 978 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 1084 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 918 Views
where do you get this stuff from? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 1119 Views
Eh, no Etzel - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 987 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 967 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 1078 Views
pure interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 979 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 1062 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 440 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 804 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 932 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Etzel - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 959 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 920 Views
IMO... Etzel - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 887 Views
And... Etzel - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 1000 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 1001 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 1062 Views
not really darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1143 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 1131 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 976 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 998 Views
Ok... Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 889 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 963 Views
I also just said that... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 862 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 922 Views
But we never... Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 980 Views
Re: But we never... Datakim - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 930 Views
I think Etzel - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 1033 Views
Re: I think Datakim - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 1026 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM 941 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true. Logain - 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM 1095 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM 1043 Views
Because some people can't read... DomA - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 1103 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 847 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 877 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM 1083 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* RandAllThor - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 1003 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 962 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base Logain - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1162 Views
hrmm, not necessarily Kieran - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 928 Views
I agree. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 467 Views
Uh... TaskmasterJack - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 1045 Views
or "can't" because ... Shishka - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 908 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... TaskmasterJack - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 926 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 1052 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous! RandAllThor - 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM 906 Views
Perrin catch-up? Comet Sedai - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 847 Views
We will get it on screen Deadsy - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 920 Views
On Mat's "death" Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1161 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" Datakim - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 881 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 1002 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 1009 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! Mats imaginary friend - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 936 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes