Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
Logain Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
In fact, BS's answer that there are flashbacks makes is highly likely that we will get a Graendal PoV.
For example, Perrin, but also Lan or Loial.
It's complete nonsense to bring back a character that died in Rand's timeline - which is up to date - with a scene before the death; something like this also never happened before in the series. One could also argue in a similarly absurd way then that we will "likely" get another Semirhage or Elza PoV from before their deaths, just because it would be cool.
We all agree that Perrin and Mat's timelines have to be advanced and that they are weeks (maybe months) behind everyone else. Other minor characters are also behind, e.g. Lan, and some of those minor characters might get a chapter devoted to them, particularly Lan.
Anyway, why are you assuming Graendal couldn't have been playing a role in the Mat or Perrin parts of the world?
Wouldn't you agree that if Graendal has a part to play with what is happening to Mat or Perrin then she could appear in the next book? I think you have to agree of that possibility.
You're making a completely different argument in your other posts. You're saying that it would be awkward, from a literary perspective, to have a dead character make a reappearance in a later book. I agree, but that doesn't preclude the possibility of seeing Graendal in this next book.
Also, remember that originally there was only going to be one final book. The decision to split the final 900K words into three books might have made the difference here. For example, suppose that RJ always intended to reveal Asmo's killer via a Graendal POV in one of the Perrin or Mat threads. It is not too hard to imagine how the Asmo reveal might have been pushed back to ToM simply because there wasn't room in TGS due to the way the storylines were chopped up.
In any event, even if Graendal is dead (and I think she is) you cannot completely rule out seeing her in ToM because ToM goes backward in time by several weeks/months.
You should at least admit the possibility.
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount
- 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM
2107 Views
This...
- 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM
1251 Views
how do you get there from this?
- 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM
1094 Views
Because...
- 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM
1075 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM
1006 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer
- 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM
969 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved
- 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM
987 Views
No...
- 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM
902 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok
- 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM
874 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM*
- 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM
832 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1037 Views
- 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM
1037 Views
Again...
- 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM
800 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal
- 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM
964 Views
The point is...
- 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM
908 Views
that is 100% your interpretation
- 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM
943 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation.
- 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM
850 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line
- 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
852 Views
As far as we know...
- 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM
909 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved
- 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM
1062 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines...
- 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM
822 Views
Indeed
- 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM
849 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM
1040 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong
- 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
928 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear.
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1108 Views
*NM*
- 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM
1108 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet...
- 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM
969 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM
1038 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters
- 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM
931 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!!
- 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM
1026 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos!
- 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM
858 Views
where do you get this stuff from?
- 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM
1069 Views
Eh, no
- 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM
933 Views
I disagree
- 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM
901 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar
- 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM
1018 Views
pure interpretation
- 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM
937 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM*
- 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM
1012 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM*
- 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM
421 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM
875 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM
906 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing
- 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM
867 Views
And...
- 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM
952 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she
- 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM
957 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR...
- 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM
1008 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said).
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
929 Views
*NM*
- 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM
929 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen
- 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM
930 Views
Ok...
- 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM
842 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary
- 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM
865 Views
But we never...
- 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM
930 Views
Re: But we never...
- 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM
882 Views
I think
- 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM
987 Views
Re: I think
- 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM
974 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM
896 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true.
- 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM
1034 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM*
- 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM
989 Views
Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM
1041 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM
803 Views
Re: Because some people can't read...
- 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM
815 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age
- 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM
1028 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM*
- 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM
949 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base
- 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM
1096 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous!
- 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM
859 Views
On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM
1114 Views
Re: On Mat's "death"
- 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM
834 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A!
- 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM
882 Views

