Active Users:420 Time:16/06/2025 05:28:55 PM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1762 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1103 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 524 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1034 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 529 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 887 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 525 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 576 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 638 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 577 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 587 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 528 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 577 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 900 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 519 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 533 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1015 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 540 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 917 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1202 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 507 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 514 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 521 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 562 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 913 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 572 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 854 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 526 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 525 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 521 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 495 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 947 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 905 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 895 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 553 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 975 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1437 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 945 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1090 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1027 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 938 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 913 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1074 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1314 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 909 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1093 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 838 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 906 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 808 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1030 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1146 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 939 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1034 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 827 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 911 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 495 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 880 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 839 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1010 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1096 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 894 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1157 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 959 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 902 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 542 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 502 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 509 Views

Reply to Message