Active Users:1329 Time:25/09/2026 05:37:42 AM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2129 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1470 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 720 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1382 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 727 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1197 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 745 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 764 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 868 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 780 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 769 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 741 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 787 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1248 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 716 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 708 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1353 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 742 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1225 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1579 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 722 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 693 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 704 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 745 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1263 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 764 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1167 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 697 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 722 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 711 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 669 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1332 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1239 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1221 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 767 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1305 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1765 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1310 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1476 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1422 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1312 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1226 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1429 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1637 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1290 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1460 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1139 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1258 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1191 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1408 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1490 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1281 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1389 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1178 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1219 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 675 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1247 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1158 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1383 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1502 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1180 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1537 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1357 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1236 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 711 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 700 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message