Active Users:272 Time:14/05/2024 09:14:30 AM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1506 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 859 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 369 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 752 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 382 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 650 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 373 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 423 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 471 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 420 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 432 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 381 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 416 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 654 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 374 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 385 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 749 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 391 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 685 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 946 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 358 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 362 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 369 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 356 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 657 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 424 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 589 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 374 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 374 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 364 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 336 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 682 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 655 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 646 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 402 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 729 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1194 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 692 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 823 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 775 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 692 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 666 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 828 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1064 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 657 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 849 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 565 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 643 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 562 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 752 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 900 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 676 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 773 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 553 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 665 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 339 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 618 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 620 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 742 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 836 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 666 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 892 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 709 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 628 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 407 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 352 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 366 Views

Reply to Message