Active Users:631 Time:26/06/2026 02:15:10 PM
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM
By providing a specific place for "pre-release" previews, and not enforcing any kind of spoiler, quoting or etc, you are placing yourself in a position of being charged with "abetting and encouraging" piracy. Not a good idea.

NaCl(think I'll just go over to 13th Depository)H2O


The NAPSTER analogy only works if the book itself was being copied for illegal distribution, which obviously would be wrong on every level.

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.

Typically, publishers do not hand out NDAs because it is really not worth the hassle. And if they're not handing out an NDA to be signed, there is nothing they can do once they've sent a book out for review. Obviously if the book has been stolen from the warehouse or the office (as happened with HARRY POTTER a few times), that is a legal matter.

Sensible bloggers will, of course, abide by any 'requests' that the publishers send along with the book (such as to wait until such and such a date or ensure a strict no-spoiler policy), otherwise they may find themselves not getting review copies of TOWERS OF MIDNIGHT or A MEMORY OF LIGHT - or indeed anything else Tor or Orbit ever publish ever again - when the time comes.

I'm seeing the Orbit reps tomorrow, so I might get some additional clarification on the ground rules and things that people seem worried about here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2043 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1378 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 672 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1318 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 678 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1117 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 706 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 714 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 800 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 722 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 721 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 697 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 732 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1151 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 657 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 660 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1263 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 699 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1149 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1480 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 669 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 643 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 649 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 702 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1178 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 715 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1105 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 643 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 665 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 658 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 626 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1233 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1158 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1146 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 701 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1235 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1681 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1218 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1394 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1341 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1228 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1155 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1341 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1569 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1211 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1378 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1069 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1182 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1114 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1310 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1407 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1202 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1274 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1092 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1163 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 635 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1160 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1087 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1284 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1391 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1114 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1436 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1258 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1155 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 671 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 644 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 639 Views

Reply to Message