Active Users:199 Time:19/05/2024 02:35:14 PM
Yes *NM* Nyrende Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM

I've received contact from a few posters who say that they're getting copies of TGS before the 27th of October. The spoiler policy at this moment is to ban all such information from being posted on the board.

Would you like the board to remain closed to these reviews until October 27, or would you like me to create a special area for them for people to read, if they want to?

If no, then all these people can read their advanced copies but post nothing about it until October 27. The advantage of this is that the board is kept clean of both good and false reviews. There are people who will post lies which could potentially contaminate the board, and create rumours on other sites as to the validity of our content i.e. make us a laughing stock.

If yes, I'll create an announced post for spoiler-free reviews of the new book. If anyone has read or claims to read the book before October 27, they can post there. Again, SPOILERS will still NOT be allowed, but these posters can post their spoiler-free reviews in this area. I'll also not defend the validity of any review, so you can read it at your peril. Don't be angry if a poster writes about the huge occurence in the early book surrounding Perrin, which just doesn't happen, and leaves you disappointed. Some posters also want to write vague details regarding the books i.e. how many chapters, maps, PoV's there are.

Examples of what you might see on this board...

- My spoiler-free review of TGS by Dragon21
- My own spoiler-free review of TGS by Hamhead
- Maps you can find in the new book by Jumpingjack


Examples of what you will not see on this board...

- My review of TGS *spoilers* *spoilers* by Jeff
- The Forsaken who die in TGS by Illiterateboy
- How TGS ends by Peterpumpkineater

Let me know what you think... I'm going to do this by popular demand. If the result is NO, it will be NO or vice-versa.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1508 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 861 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 371 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 754 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 383 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 652 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 373 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 424 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 472 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 421 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 434 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 382 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 417 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 654 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 374 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 386 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 750 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 392 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 688 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 948 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 362 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 362 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 371 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 358 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 658 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 425 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 591 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 374 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 375 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 366 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 338 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 684 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 656 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 647 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 403 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 730 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1194 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 694 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 823 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 777 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 694 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 667 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 830 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1065 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 659 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 850 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 566 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 645 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 563 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 754 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 901 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 677 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 773 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 555 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 667 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 340 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 620 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 622 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 743 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 836 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 669 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 893 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 709 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 630 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 409 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 355 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 367 Views

Reply to Message