Active Users:263 Time:14/05/2024 04:43:09 AM
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
The book does not go on sale until the 27th. I'm sure that ppl (if there actually are any, not sure of this) have been provided with advance copies they've also agreed to some sort of NDA. I dislike the thought of RAFO promoting the breaking of a NDA.
Besides, I think it will promote all kinds of faux nonesense. "Rand is a transvestite!" "Egwene kills Gawyn in a fit of rage!" etc etc. I don't think we need that either.



The posts are to be spoiler free only. Which means says things like 'Oh man it was awesome when Moiraine came back and balefired Cadsuane' are off limits. If anyone posts things that are clearly spoilers then the admins will delete it. I don't see anything wrong with post like 'the Rand chapters are really dark and depressing' or 'Egwene shows herself to be a strong chargacter and is far more likable than in most of the series'.

I do agree with you to a degree in that I don't think we'll get a wholelot more from the reviews than we've already got from Jason's and there's no really way to prove that the people writing the reviews actually have read an advanced copy, still it should be there for those who are interested I think.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
This message last edited by Crackbrained Asha'man on 21/09/2009 at 08:27:09 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1506 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 859 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 369 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 752 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 382 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 650 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 373 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 423 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 471 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 420 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 432 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 381 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 416 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 653 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 373 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 385 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 749 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 391 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 685 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 946 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 358 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 361 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 369 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 356 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 657 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 424 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 589 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 374 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 374 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 364 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 336 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 682 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 655 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 646 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 402 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 728 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1194 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 692 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 823 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 774 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 692 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 665 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 828 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1064 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 657 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 849 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 565 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 643 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 562 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 752 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 899 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 676 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 773 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 553 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 664 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 339 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 618 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 620 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 741 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 836 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 666 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 891 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 709 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 628 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 407 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 352 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 366 Views

Reply to Message