Active Users:954 Time:12/05/2026 11:41:40 AM
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
The book does not go on sale until the 27th. I'm sure that ppl (if there actually are any, not sure of this) have been provided with advance copies they've also agreed to some sort of NDA. I dislike the thought of RAFO promoting the breaking of a NDA.
Besides, I think it will promote all kinds of faux nonesense. "Rand is a transvestite!" "Egwene kills Gawyn in a fit of rage!" etc etc. I don't think we need that either.



The posts are to be spoiler free only. Which means says things like 'Oh man it was awesome when Moiraine came back and balefired Cadsuane' are off limits. If anyone posts things that are clearly spoilers then the admins will delete it. I don't see anything wrong with post like 'the Rand chapters are really dark and depressing' or 'Egwene shows herself to be a strong chargacter and is far more likable than in most of the series'.

I do agree with you to a degree in that I don't think we'll get a wholelot more from the reviews than we've already got from Jason's and there's no really way to prove that the people writing the reviews actually have read an advanced copy, still it should be there for those who are interested I think.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
This message last edited by Crackbrained Asha'man on 21/09/2009 at 08:27:09 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2026 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1346 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 659 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1295 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 647 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1099 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 696 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 701 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 786 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 703 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 709 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 683 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 720 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1131 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 646 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 648 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1244 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 666 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1129 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1454 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 659 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 630 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 638 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 684 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1160 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 700 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1089 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 635 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 655 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 642 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 615 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1204 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1131 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1125 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 688 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1222 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1655 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1200 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1378 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1314 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1210 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1135 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1317 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1545 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1182 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1360 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1054 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1163 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1087 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1288 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1385 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1184 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1249 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1065 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1147 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 625 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1132 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1056 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1267 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1356 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1097 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1412 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1239 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1133 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 660 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 630 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 629 Views

Reply to Message