Active Users:1348 Time:25/09/2026 05:38:48 AM
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man Send a noteboard - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM
The book does not go on sale until the 27th. I'm sure that ppl (if there actually are any, not sure of this) have been provided with advance copies they've also agreed to some sort of NDA. I dislike the thought of RAFO promoting the breaking of a NDA.
Besides, I think it will promote all kinds of faux nonesense. "Rand is a transvestite!" "Egwene kills Gawyn in a fit of rage!" etc etc. I don't think we need that either.



The posts are to be spoiler free only. Which means says things like 'Oh man it was awesome when Moiraine came back and balefired Cadsuane' are off limits. If anyone posts things that are clearly spoilers then the admins will delete it. I don't see anything wrong with post like 'the Rand chapters are really dark and depressing' or 'Egwene shows herself to be a strong chargacter and is far more likable than in most of the series'.

I do agree with you to a degree in that I don't think we'll get a wholelot more from the reviews than we've already got from Jason's and there's no really way to prove that the people writing the reviews actually have read an advanced copy, still it should be there for those who are interested I think.
While the wicked stand confounded call me, with thy saint surrounded
This message last edited by Crackbrained Asha'man on 21/09/2009 at 08:27:09 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2130 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1470 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 720 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1382 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 728 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1198 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 745 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 765 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 869 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 780 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 770 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 741 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 787 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1248 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 716 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 708 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1353 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 742 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1225 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1580 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 723 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 694 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 705 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 745 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1263 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 764 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1167 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 697 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 722 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 711 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 670 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1332 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1239 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1222 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 767 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1305 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1766 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1310 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1477 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1423 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1313 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1226 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1429 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1638 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1291 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1460 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1140 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1258 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1192 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1409 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1491 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1281 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1390 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1178 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1219 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 675 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1248 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1158 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1383 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1502 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1180 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1537 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1357 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1236 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 712 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 700 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message