Active Users:640 Time:10/11/2026 12:28:08 AM
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Yet this is what you said.
"Surely the idea of making reviewers provide proof that they do actually have the book would put this issue to rest once and for all while also ensuring that the site only offers genuine reviews?"
So I ask you again, are YOU personally willing to be the one to make sure the reviewers provide proof? Or are you just willing to give others more work?


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

Again are you willing to police the reviews to be sure they are spoiler free? Sid said he wouldn't, and I don't blame him. And I never said that RAFO members would be leagally responsible, and if I inadvertantly gave that impression I apologize; but RAFO as an website may be subject to shutdown.

NaCl(but obviously it's going to happen anyway, just wanted to be on record as being against it)H2O

This message last edited by NaClH2O on 22/09/2009 at 12:44:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2166 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1523 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 749 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1423 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 752 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1232 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 764 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 788 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 914 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 812 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 795 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 774 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 810 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1297 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 736 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 738 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1399 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 769 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1268 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1634 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 741 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 725 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 725 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 766 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1292 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 801 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1217 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 715 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 760 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 736 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 690 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1394 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1291 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1269 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 797 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1350 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1813 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1353 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1512 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1466 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1354 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1261 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1478 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1682 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1338 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1505 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1176 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1303 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1239 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1454 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1554 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1322 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1444 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1240 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1266 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 694 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1305 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1200 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1446 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1541 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1219 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1594 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1410 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1289 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 734 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 733 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 702 Views

Reply to Message