Active Users:442 Time:10/08/2026 03:46:13 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM
I don't think any proof should be necessary at all (see my comment about how wotmania was filled with spoiler-free reviews for at least the last three books with no negative effects to speak of). No system for prooving something like this would be foolproof in today's day and age, of course.

Yet this is what you said.
"Surely the idea of making reviewers provide proof that they do actually have the book would put this issue to rest once and for all while also ensuring that the site only offers genuine reviews?"
So I ask you again, are YOU personally willing to be the one to make sure the reviewers provide proof? Or are you just willing to give others more work?


I'm missing the Napster connection here. RAFO has stipulated that reviews be spoiler/content-free, so noone would be allowed to post quotes from the book. One's impressions about a book, CD, movie, or any other copyrighted work are not copyrightable as far as I know. On a side note, do you really think every RAFO member would be personally liable to Tor if one member posted one quote from the book?

Again are you willing to police the reviews to be sure they are spoiler free? Sid said he wouldn't, and I don't blame him. And I never said that RAFO members would be leagally responsible, and if I inadvertantly gave that impression I apologize; but RAFO as an website may be subject to shutdown.

NaCl(but obviously it's going to happen anyway, just wanted to be on record as being against it)H2O

This message last edited by NaClH2O on 22/09/2009 at 12:44:36 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2091 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 696 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1430 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 697 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1348 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 711 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1159 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 723 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 744 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 837 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 780 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 751 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 745 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 720 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 761 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 1326 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 709 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1205 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 687 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 684 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1314 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 720 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1186 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1539 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 698 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 666 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 697 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 674 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 728 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1225 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 740 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1135 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 669 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 696 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 683 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 688 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 651 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1279 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1198 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1184 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 1157 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 1298 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 729 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1270 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1722 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1253 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1436 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1384 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1270 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1195 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1383 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1603 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1254 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1425 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1103 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1220 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1159 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1357 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1450 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1244 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1327 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1136 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1189 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 655 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1209 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1127 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1336 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1445 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1146 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1482 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1319 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1189 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 693 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 675 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 664 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes