Active Users:1275 Time:25/09/2026 05:36:40 AM
Re: Good to know. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk.


I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.

Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews
Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.

Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.


Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2129 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1470 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 720 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1382 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 727 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1197 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 745 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 764 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 868 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 779 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 769 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 740 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 787 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1248 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 716 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 708 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1353 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 742 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1225 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1579 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 722 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 693 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 704 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 745 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1262 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 764 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1167 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 696 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 722 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 711 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 669 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1331 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1238 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1221 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 766 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1305 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1765 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1310 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1476 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1422 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1312 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1225 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1429 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1637 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1290 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1459 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1139 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1257 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1191 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1408 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1490 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1281 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1389 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1178 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1218 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 675 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1247 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1158 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1383 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1502 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1180 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1536 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1357 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1235 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 711 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 699 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message