Active Users:989 Time:12/05/2026 11:39:58 AM
Re: Good to know. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk.


I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.

Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews
Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.

Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.


Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2026 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1346 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 659 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1294 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 646 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1099 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 696 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 700 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 785 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 702 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 708 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 682 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 720 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1131 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 646 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 648 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1244 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 666 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1129 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1453 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 658 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 630 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 637 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 684 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1159 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 700 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1088 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 634 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 654 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 642 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 615 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1203 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1130 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1124 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 687 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1222 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1654 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1200 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1377 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1314 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1209 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1135 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1317 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1544 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1182 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1359 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1053 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1163 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1086 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1288 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1384 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1184 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1248 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1065 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1146 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 625 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1131 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1055 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1266 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1356 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1097 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1411 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1239 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1133 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 659 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 629 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 628 Views

Reply to Message