Active Users:623 Time:26/06/2026 02:16:15 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm strongly against it Sidious Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM
deleting bogus posts? In addition if they are completely spoiler free what's the point? Do you really care if dude xyz hated it? or that ms abc didn't like the gawyn parts? Is that really going to make a difference if you buy the book or not? Of couse not. I just don't see it. Why pander to such stuff? Everybody says "don't feed the trolls" but here we are on the verge of no only feeding them but inviting them in, giving them a place to stay and three squares a day.

But it looks like it's going to happen anyway. Guess I'll be spending my time over at 13th depository.

NaCl(I'll just express my displeasure with my feet)H2O +<img class=' />


I've been against it from the beginning, but the board seems to be indifferent to the issues at hand, namely that...

1. Tor insisted this week once again that there are no pre-release copies, and that Jason is the only one who has access to the book.

2. That pre-release distribution of the book is a copyright infringement which Tor are serious about nailing down on. RAFO will become a focal point for every person who has messed with Tor, even if they have done so unwittingly.

3. Even if there are decent reviews, there are bound to be hoaxes and lies which will damage our reputation as posters or as a place with worthy content.

4. Risking our reputation and exposing the board to all manner of trash is not worth it when the book is coming out in 5 weeks anyway. We've had the Prologue and the first chapter, and to go beserk for the rest of the book is utterly pointless.

Despite this, I'm a man of my word. I said I'd do what the board wants. I'll make a post at the top of the page for any pre-release content, but I'm not going to check on it even once. I'd like to enjoy the actual book when it comes out, and I don't take responsibility for what's in there. If people want pre-review reviews, they must expose themselves to potential lies and hoaxes, because I haven't read the book and I don't know what's true and what isn't. There will still be no spoilers on the main board, and people can access that post at their free will, albeit with my objections.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2043 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 679 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1378 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 672 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1319 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 679 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1117 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 706 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 714 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 800 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 754 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 722 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 722 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 698 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 732 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 1267 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 691 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1151 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 657 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 660 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1264 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 699 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1149 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1480 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 669 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 643 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 669 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 649 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 703 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1178 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 715 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1106 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 644 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 666 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 655 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 658 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 626 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1233 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1158 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1147 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 1130 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 1247 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 701 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1236 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1682 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1219 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1395 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1341 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1228 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1155 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1341 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1570 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1211 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1378 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1069 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1182 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1115 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1310 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1408 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1202 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1275 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1092 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1164 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 636 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1161 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1087 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1285 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1391 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1114 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1437 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1258 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1155 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 671 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 645 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 639 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes