Active Users:1351 Time:25/09/2026 05:38:52 AM
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM
I agree that false rumors can make things bad for the board, but so can the total absence of reviews.

As such, we can expect a dramatic increase in activity when tGS is just around the corner. Reviews, and I agree they must be spoiler free, should be allowed so that people will head here to read them, and then be drawn into the discussion.

I would prefer it though, if you ask them to run it by you first. Some posters like KCF, Wert, etc. are getting advanced review copies (I think) and can be relied upon to give sensible reviews. Why not ask them if they'd like to post their official spoiler free reviews here as well? Maybe they can read through some reviews from unknown people and see if there are any ridiculous claims which they know are false (if they have the time and inclination for it, of course)?

I think keeping reviews off the board will be silly, and people will go to Dragonmount, theoryland and even westeros for discussion if reviews are completely absent here.
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 2130 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1471 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 721 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1383 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 728 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1198 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 746 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 765 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 869 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 780 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 770 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 741 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 787 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1249 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 716 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 708 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1354 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 742 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1225 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1580 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 723 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 694 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 705 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 746 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1263 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 764 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1167 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 697 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 722 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 711 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 670 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1332 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1239 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1222 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 767 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1306 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1766 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1311 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1477 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1423 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1313 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1226 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1429 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1638 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1291 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1460 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1140 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1258 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1192 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1409 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1491 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1281 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1390 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1178 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1219 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 676 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1248 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1158 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1383 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1502 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1180 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1537 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1357 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1236 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 712 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 700 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 681 Views

Reply to Message