Active Users:399 Time:01/05/2025 10:33:35 PM
Re: Good to know. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk.


I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.

Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews
Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.

Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.


Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1681 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1024 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 454 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 955 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 459 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 806 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 457 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 507 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 555 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 506 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 517 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 459 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 507 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 820 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 453 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 465 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 933 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 472 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 836 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1124 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 439 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 445 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 452 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 495 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 834 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 501 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 773 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 457 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 458 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 453 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 426 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 867 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 826 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 815 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 482 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 895 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1358 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 862 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1010 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 949 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 857 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 834 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 996 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1234 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 832 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1013 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 755 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 832 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 728 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 948 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1066 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 861 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 955 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 750 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 833 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 428 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 798 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 760 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 930 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1018 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 817 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1072 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 879 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 826 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 474 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 434 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 440 Views

Reply to Message