Active Users:478 Time:27/03/2026 05:35:15 AM
Re: Good to know. DomA Send a noteboard - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM
I hadn't heard that Harriet and Brandon didn't want anything out there. Of course I wouldn't have voted for something that was against their wishes if I had. So yeah, I take back my yes vote now that I know this. And I kind of feel like a jerk.


I don't know either, but it's the vibe I get from the little I know, notably the decision not to have ARC printed.

Don't feel like a jerk, you can't be blamed for wanting reviews
Personally I don't mind them - I just won't read them except from one or two reviewers I know and trust, if they happen to publish some down the line. I don't want to go into TGS with false expectations because I don't know where this or that person stands about the series, that's all. Jason I knew, having read his previous reviews and knowing on what we agree and disagree - and I know he'd be very respectful about spoilers, so I read him. There are few others like this - Bob Klutz, Leigh Butler, Matt from TL - and that's about it. There's gonna be plenty of time to read what other readers think of TGS after I've read TGS.

Unauthorized and fake reviews I'm against on principle, though. The less of those around the better, as far as I'm concerned. It might stay in a single thread here, but that won't stop people from repeating the information elsewhere, whether it's true or false.


Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1995 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1308 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 637 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1254 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 623 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1062 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 682 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 683 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 764 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 679 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 687 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 665 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 702 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1087 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 626 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 632 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1208 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 648 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1094 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1410 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 642 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 613 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 613 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 663 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1128 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 683 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1044 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 616 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 633 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 625 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 597 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1164 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1087 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1079 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 669 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1183 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1614 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1162 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1341 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1280 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1165 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1093 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1280 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1502 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1140 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1320 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 1015 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1128 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1045 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1249 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1345 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1148 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1209 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1028 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1101 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 604 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1096 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 1020 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1230 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1314 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1060 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1372 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1204 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1099 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 639 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 607 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 614 Views

Reply to Message