Active Users:814 Time:08/02/2026 10:05:35 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? Sidious - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1962 Views
No, if people want to review the book, they can do it on their own blogs. *NM* AliasRY - 20/09/2009 09:27:18 AM 637 Views
Yes. RandAllThor - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1286 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 625 Views
Yes ajfurst - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1218 Views
No. *NM* Palatine - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 612 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. Ashaman_Luc - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1038 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* Blaine - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 669 Views
NO! *NM* Napoleon62 - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 671 Views
No *NM* Milla - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 745 Views
Yes. Visitors who don't want them should simply avoid reading them. *NM* Segovia - 20/09/2009 02:42:15 PM 702 Views
Yes *NM* StinkerSkunk - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 667 Views
Yes please! *NM* Amyrlin Seat - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 674 Views
NO *NM* M'Hael Reborn - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 647 Views
Yes *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 687 Views
If it's going to be in a separate section, and it's spoiler free, why is "NO" even an option? Yvves - 20/09/2009 05:04:11 PM 1174 Views
Absolutley! ^ If they don't want to read that section then it shouldn't be a problem. *NM* Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:24:37 AM 647 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? MissKoalaVB - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1064 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 609 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 622 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. fionwe1987 - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1183 Views
YES. *NM* Darth_Katie - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 634 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? Segovia - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1071 Views
Yes, why not? Crackbrained Asha'man - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1381 Views
Yes *NM* Nyrende - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 625 Views
Yes *NM* Blaine - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 600 Views
Yes-- reviews are an essential part of any fanpage-- People have the option not to read them though *NM* Matrimony Cauthon - 20/09/2009 06:53:42 PM 629 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* Heiko - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 601 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* sue - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 649 Views
Yes! vandevere - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1096 Views
yes *NM* lankyevilme - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 672 Views
Yes ranagrande - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 1023 Views
Yes *NM* Myrdhyn - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 605 Views
Yes *NM* Corwin - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 622 Views
Why is No even an option? there supposedly wont be spoilers duh *NM* Nargs - 20/09/2009 11:40:37 PM 608 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* animeeyez - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 609 Views
Yes *NM* Deadsy - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 587 Views
I vote yes. Seriana Sedai - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1140 Views
Yes Mats imaginary friend - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1061 Views
Yes rAndy aL - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1052 Views
Yes. If a review is clearly marked as such, please who don't want to read it don't have to. *NM* Nebhead - 21/09/2009 12:59:54 PM 1076 Views
If they are quarantined in an announced post, I don't see and problem for me, so yes I guess Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 21/09/2009 01:09:41 PM 1166 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* j-whitt987 - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 656 Views
No NaClH2O - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1157 Views
I think you missread the rules... Crackbrained Asha'man - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1592 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1131 Views
I'm strongly against it Sidious - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1314 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list Lady Isa Avanderidhril - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1236 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1130 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1059 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1252 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1477 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1113 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it DomA - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1285 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere RandAllThor - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 993 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1098 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. DomA - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 1018 Views
Good to know. Seriana Sedai - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1217 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. fionwe1987 - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1322 Views
Re: Good to know. DomA - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1116 Views
Interesting Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1186 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? ajfurst - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 1002 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1076 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* Ryan - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 593 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. everynametaken - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1064 Views
Ever hear of Napster? NaClH2O - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 988 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1199 Views
Sounds right to me. RandAllThor - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1289 Views
Thank you for the clarification. everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1038 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1344 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. Werthead - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1165 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1075 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* everynametaken - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 625 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* Werthead - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 593 Views
No *NM* bogotabandit2 - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 598 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes