Active Users:1590 Time:25/12/2025 12:23:38 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1925 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1247 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 606 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1176 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 596 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 1006 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 645 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 655 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 731 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 658 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 664 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 628 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 671 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 1030 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 595 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 605 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1142 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 618 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 1039 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1352 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 614 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 587 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 589 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 634 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 1064 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 660 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 983 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 595 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 609 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 595 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 571 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 1102 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 1033 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 1020 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 644 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 1116 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1553 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 1089 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1272 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1191 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 1094 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 1025 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1214 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1449 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 1079 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1239 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 965 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 1061 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 963 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1185 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1291 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 1073 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1150 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 966 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 1038 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 578 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 1026 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 947 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1154 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1248 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 1007 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1308 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 1131 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 1043 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 611 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 578 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 579 Views

Reply to Message