Active Users:718 Time:03/08/2025 12:12:20 PM
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM

The 'legal' arguments I've seen in this thread do not really hold water, and do not come close to any review policy or agreement I've ever seen a publisher issue in four years of getting review copies of books.


That really holds only for legally acquired review copies - I don't think anyone contest the legality/morality of any reviews originating from those.

Discussing the content of leaked copies/illegally obtained copies is at the very least a very good way to get on the publisher's bad side and the publishers would be perfectly in their legal rights to take measures to have these reviews/spoilers removed from sites hosting them. I know it's the case for movie spoilers - I've signed enough NDA in two decades for the stuff I work on to know this - and I don't see why it wouldn't be the same for books that are protected by the same laws.

It's known Tor has not printed ARC for TGS and reviewers who've inquired are told copies of the book for reviewers won't be sent before late in the game, perhaps even on release date (Ken, Larry etc. all got that answer from Tor) You're saying Orbit too will send copies to bloggers like you only late, shortly before the street date. From where exactly legal copies for review are supposed to come from until then? The few possible authorized reviews from well-known players in the WOT community aside, the rest will be hoaxes and copies obtained through variously illegal means.

This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2009 at 07:35:27 PM
Reply to message
Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 08:40:03 AM 1781 Views
Yes. - 20/09/2009 11:56:22 AM 1125 Views
Sorry wrong place. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:31:27 PM 545 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 01:12:18 PM 1056 Views
No. *NM* - 20/09/2009 01:26:48 PM 542 Views
No, I prefer to see them after the 27th. - 20/09/2009 01:42:38 PM 905 Views
They don't have to read them if they don't want to *NM* - 21/09/2009 01:54:30 AM 540 Views
NO! *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:05:47 PM 590 Views
No *NM* - 20/09/2009 02:22:15 PM 658 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:08:41 PM 593 Views
Yes please! *NM* - 20/09/2009 03:40:41 PM 599 Views
NO *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:16:55 PM 541 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 04:17:32 PM 587 Views
Re: Do you guys want pre-release reviews on this board? - 20/09/2009 05:33:49 PM 917 Views
I just hate getting interupted. even if I'm at work *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:13 PM 534 Views
Sorry wrong place *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:12:54 PM 546 Views
We need them to maintain the spike in activity. - 20/09/2009 05:34:14 PM 1038 Views
YES. *NM* - 20/09/2009 05:44:48 PM 553 Views
Can anyone who voted no explain why? - 20/09/2009 05:51:51 PM 932 Views
Yes, why not? - 20/09/2009 06:18:42 PM 1226 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:30:54 PM 521 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 06:39:34 PM 527 Views
Yes. I see no reason not to. *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:08:47 PM 533 Views
No, I'll just read them and then go regretting it *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:18:27 PM 577 Views
Yes! - 20/09/2009 07:30:59 PM 934 Views
yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 07:46:37 PM 584 Views
Yes - 20/09/2009 08:34:03 PM 872 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:08:42 PM 539 Views
Yes *NM* - 20/09/2009 10:17:51 PM 540 Views
Yes- Give ppl the option to see the reviews *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:03:27 AM 533 Views
Yes *NM* - 21/09/2009 12:33:13 AM 510 Views
I vote yes. - 21/09/2009 04:21:28 AM 968 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 06:12:37 AM 923 Views
Yes - 21/09/2009 09:32:56 AM 914 Views
Yes. Don't click the link if you don't want to read it. *NM* - 21/09/2009 02:39:16 PM 569 Views
No - 21/09/2009 06:15:19 PM 994 Views
I think you missread the rules... - 21/09/2009 08:24:22 PM 1456 Views
so you want to give the admins all kinds of extra work? - 22/09/2009 02:16:56 AM 971 Views
I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 05:06:13 AM 1131 Views
I hadn't thought about all that, you should have made some kind of pros and cons list - 22/09/2009 08:53:39 AM 1050 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 11:45:26 AM 962 Views
So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:03:16 PM 932 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:16:57 PM 1097 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 12:42:55 PM 1337 Views
Re: So are you going to be the one to enforce this? - 22/09/2009 01:20:58 PM 929 Views
Re: I'm strongly against it - 22/09/2009 02:39:55 PM 1110 Views
As I mentioned elsewhere - 22/09/2009 02:51:00 PM 854 Views
I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 05:44:18 PM 925 Views
Re: I had no idea about these legalities. - 22/09/2009 06:25:20 PM 831 Views
Good to know. - 22/09/2009 10:19:57 PM 1049 Views
I'm shitfitng to no too. Hope more people change their votes. - 22/09/2009 10:34:22 PM 1162 Views
Re: Good to know. - 22/09/2009 11:01:35 PM 963 Views
Interesting - 23/09/2009 12:16:38 AM 1054 Views
How much is that infamous COT review to blame? - 24/09/2009 05:01:29 AM 847 Views
Well, Rand IS a transvestite - not exactly a spoiler anymore. - 22/09/2009 08:29:12 AM 933 Views
No, no, no, no, no! *NM* - 21/09/2009 06:31:22 PM 511 Views
You're going to ban/forbid spoiler filled reviews? Weak. - 22/09/2009 08:26:15 AM 900 Views
Ever hear of Napster? - 22/09/2009 12:11:02 PM 859 Views
But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 12:36:35 AM 1032 Views
Sounds right to me. - 23/09/2009 12:27:57 PM 1118 Views
Thank you for the clarification. - 23/09/2009 07:04:13 PM 912 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 23/09/2009 07:33:11 PM 1198 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 27/09/2009 02:41:11 AM 984 Views
Re: But that only applies to piracy of the actual book itself. - 28/09/2009 07:53:46 PM 918 Views
Baloney. The two are not related at all. *NM* - 23/09/2009 07:00:47 PM 557 Views
Yes, as long as no-spoiler policy is employed. *NM* - 23/09/2009 12:04:41 AM 517 Views
No *NM* - 25/09/2009 07:05:03 AM 524 Views

Reply to Message