Active Users:391 Time:01/05/2025 05:44:51 PM
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
In fact I said the opposite. There are people like the Tuatha'an that are inclusive of the original Aiel population and those who ran away from Hold and Clan that have moved around to a variety of places. These people are not included in Aviendha's vision and could very well be who the remnant is in reference. You cannot make a blanket statement that Aviendha's vision is untrue because the remnant doesn't survive when we have no way of knowing what happened to a portion of the Aiel population.

My entire point has been the Aiel are larger than just the group living in the Waste and Aviendha's vision only speaks to that group and to the portion of that group that stood and opposed the Seanchan and lost... The Prophetic remnant could easily still be living The Way in some portion of that future and the Prophesy would have been fulfilled.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 1966 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 983 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 942 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 949 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 866 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 947 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1103 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 460 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 997 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1198 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 934 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 912 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 855 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 896 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1141 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 849 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 817 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 759 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 851 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 928 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 862 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 970 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 945 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 965 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 754 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 684 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 897 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 750 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 897 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 793 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 809 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 977 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 755 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 775 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 845 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 824 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 793 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 762 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 937 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 813 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 882 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 909 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 773 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 877 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 768 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 965 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 723 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 754 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 758 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 887 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 671 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 942 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 990 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 874 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 438 Views

Reply to Message