Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
In fact I said the opposite. There are people like the Tuatha'an that are inclusive of the original Aiel population and those who ran away from Hold and Clan that have moved around to a variety of places. These people are not included in Aviendha's vision and could very well be who the remnant is in reference. You cannot make a blanket statement that Aviendha's vision is untrue because the remnant doesn't survive when we have no way of knowing what happened to a portion of the Aiel population.
My entire point has been the Aiel are larger than just the group living in the Waste and Aviendha's vision only speaks to that group and to the portion of that group that stood and opposed the Seanchan and lost... The Prophetic remnant could easily still be living The Way in some portion of that future and the Prophesy would have been fulfilled.
My entire point has been the Aiel are larger than just the group living in the Waste and Aviendha's vision only speaks to that group and to the portion of that group that stood and opposed the Seanchan and lost... The Prophetic remnant could easily still be living The Way in some portion of that future and the Prophesy would have been fulfilled.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan
- 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM
2290 Views
The entire point, I believe, is to give Avienda the opportunity to change that future
- 03/04/2012 05:13:48 PM
1665 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM
1298 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel
- 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM
1260 Views
There are more than there were before.
- 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM
1244 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers
- 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM
1190 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM
1278 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM
1547 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM
1344 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM
1702 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM
1167 Views
Re: Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well.
- 06/04/2012 12:20:31 AM
1370 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM
1520 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM
1211 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel.
- 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM
1121 Views
So what you're saying...
- 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM
1047 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel
- 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM
1171 Views
I never said it was.
- 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM
1299 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been
- 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM
1205 Views
No...
- 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM
1315 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM
1294 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM
1306 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc
- 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM
1101 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could
- 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM
1199 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake.
- 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM
1093 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM
1241 Views
No. They are not.
- 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM
1116 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel
- 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM
1119 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible.
- 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
1311 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel
- 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM
1052 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant.
- 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM
1105 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM
1157 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant
- 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM
1154 Views
That is what I just said
- 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM
1125 Views
What is important about that?
- 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM
1079 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand
- 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM
1250 Views
So what you're saying is...
- 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM
1148 Views
That's exactly it
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1209 Views
- 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM
1209 Views
Good.
- 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM
1220 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it
- 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM
1109 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever.
- 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM
1158 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM
1129 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing
- 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM
1329 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was...
- 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM
1083 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years?
- 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM
1020 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM
1329 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway.
- 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM
1209 Views
