Active Users:563 Time:19/03/2026 01:06:33 AM
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM
And then every time I've asked you to do so, you've redefined the remnant of a remnant instead. When I try to explain that you're redefining the remnant of a remnant instead of the Aiel, you insist that you're redefining the Aiel.

In fact I said the opposite. There are people like the Tuatha'an that are inclusive of the original Aiel population and those who ran away from Hold and Clan that have moved around to a variety of places. These people are not included in Aviendha's vision and could very well be who the remnant is in reference. You cannot make a blanket statement that Aviendha's vision is untrue because the remnant doesn't survive when we have no way of knowing what happened to a portion of the Aiel population.


I didn't say the REMNANT didn't survive, I've said that THE REST OF THE AIEL DO.

Take ten apples. These are the Aiel.

Take one out of those ten apples. This is the remnant of a remnant, who will be saved and who will live.

Nine apples remain. These are the Aiel who are unsaved and who will not live.

In Aviendha's vision, those nine apples show up fine, in complete defiance of the prophecy.
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Aviendha, the columns, and the Seanchan - 03/04/2012 04:29:31 PM 2168 Views
As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 03/04/2012 07:30:52 PM 1177 Views
Depends on how one defines Aiel - 04/04/2012 04:11:11 AM 1145 Views
There are more than there were before. - 04/04/2012 07:03:27 AM 1147 Views
But when the prophesy was made there many followers - 04/04/2012 10:10:54 AM 1079 Views
The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 04/04/2012 06:28:47 PM 1167 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 01:41:23 AM 1407 Views
Well that more than covers it *NM* - 05/04/2012 04:43:53 AM 554 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 07:39:04 AM 1216 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 05/04/2012 02:14:37 PM 1511 Views
For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 02:25:47 PM 1119 Views
Re: For the record I agree that the visions are not true either - 05/04/2012 11:36:53 PM 1107 Views
Yes, I was thinking of the Aiel's suicidal traditions as well. - 05/04/2012 06:24:56 PM 1053 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:51:00 PM 1113 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 06/04/2012 10:38:24 PM 1386 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 06:27:27 AM 1085 Views
Re: The Tuatha'an are not Aiel. - 07/04/2012 07:23:03 PM 1000 Views
So what you're saying... - 07/04/2012 10:07:59 PM 938 Views
What I am saying is that it's not a "pure bloodline" that makes one an Aiel - 08/04/2012 12:16:10 AM 1050 Views
I never said it was. - 08/04/2012 12:43:26 AM 1149 Views
Actually you did In your above post you speak of the Tinkers as not Aiel because they have been - 08/04/2012 06:09:01 AM 1091 Views
No... - 08/04/2012 07:12:22 AM 1183 Views
You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 05:16:54 PM 1172 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 06:43:27 PM 1181 Views
Re: You have no evidence that the Tuath'an are mostly comprised of runaways etc - 08/04/2012 07:52:10 PM 965 Views
Thanks for that. - 09/04/2012 02:38:25 AM 863 Views
Red hair is double recessive ... Doesn't take much to eliminate it from the gene pool. There could - 08/04/2012 11:22:36 PM 1076 Views
You are consistently making the same mistake. - 09/04/2012 02:45:46 AM 956 Views
They are the same thing. The remnant of a remnant are Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:04:55 AM 1119 Views
No. They are not. - 10/04/2012 05:42:29 AM 981 Views
Never said the remnant of the remnant was the whole of the Aiel - 10/04/2012 05:45:47 PM 995 Views
You said that redefining the Aiel would allow Aviendha's vision to be possible. - 10/04/2012 06:53:51 PM 1179 Views
No , I said there were many ways to interpret the statement based on how one defines Aiel - 10/04/2012 07:36:11 PM 937 Views
All of which is entirely irrelevant. - 10/04/2012 07:38:29 PM 965 Views
Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 10/04/2012 07:47:04 PM 1028 Views
Re: Actually it states he will save a remnant of a remnant - 11/04/2012 01:40:36 AM 1042 Views
That is what I just said - 14/04/2012 01:41:56 AM 1001 Views
What is important about that? - 14/04/2012 04:35:55 AM 968 Views
The importance is that the prophesy says that Rand - 14/04/2012 06:06:31 PM 1134 Views
So what you're saying is... - 14/04/2012 09:45:36 PM 1032 Views
That's exactly it - 14/04/2012 11:21:25 PM 1087 Views
Good. - 15/04/2012 02:01:14 AM 1115 Views
He sets it in motion, thus his actions lead to it - 15/04/2012 02:55:13 PM 963 Views
Yes, but in that case, he is responsible for everything, ever. - 15/04/2012 05:29:31 PM 1048 Views
We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 15/04/2012 07:21:29 PM 997 Views
Re: We are interpreting Prophesy here ... Direct v. Indirect actions are what we are discussing - 17/04/2012 04:18:32 AM 1203 Views
Depends on how you look at the Prophesy - 18/04/2012 01:45:23 PM 934 Views
Of course, but the point of my example was... - 17/04/2012 06:08:09 PM 971 Views
Where are you getting this happens over thousands of years? - 18/04/2012 01:47:42 PM 915 Views
Because that was the important part of that post. - 18/04/2012 05:28:10 PM 1076 Views
Don't know when this became about winning - 19/04/2012 02:08:16 AM 868 Views
Re: I never said it was. - 18/04/2012 12:37:23 AM 1158 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 04/04/2012 07:16:13 AM 1193 Views
Re: As far as I understand it, that future is impossible anyway. - 06/04/2012 10:33:00 PM 1084 Views
Thank you for that analysis. *NM* - 17/04/2012 12:36:08 AM 531 Views

Reply to Message