Egwene is noting Mesaana's strength of will in TAR when she makes the comment about not daring to face her alone ... she nearly lost her mind just minutes prior
As for Egwene facing Mesaana ... there are several comments around Egwene's plans and then there is the fact that she was alone when she thought Mesaana was coming for her.
Mesaana would need something grand to offset so many failures. Killing Egwene would work. That might send the White Tower back into division.
Gawyn had been mortified when she'd said she might use herself as bait. Dared she do so? She gripped the railing, standing above the Tower, above the city that depended on her, looking out on a world that needed her.
Something had to be done; Mesaana had to be drawn out. If what Saerin said was true, then the woman would be willing to fight directly—she wouldn't hide and poke from the shadows. Egwene's task, then, was to tempt her with an opportunity, one that didn't seem obvious, one she couldn't resist.
a plan which she shared with NO ONE
Then there is this:
She folded her arms beneath her breasts. He could almost feel the heat of her anger. "Your yelling has drawn half of the White Tower. They saw you captured. The assassin probably knows, now, about my weaves."
"Light, Egwene! You talk as if I did it on purpose. I was only trying to protect you."
"I didn't ask for your protection! I asked for your obedience! Gawyn, don't you see the opportunity we've missed? If you hadn't scared Mesaana away, she'd have walked into my traps!"
Making it even more clear that Egwene had a plan all her own ... you know as well as I do that an Amyrlin is not allowed to willingly put herself in danger so the Hall would never have approved of this.
then we have her direct statement:
"I have sisters researching everything we can find about Mesaana," Egwene continued. "She's not a warrior, Gawyn. She's an administrator, a planner. If I can confront her, I can defeat her. But we must find her first. Exposing myself is only one of my plans—and you are right, it is dangerous. But my precautions have been extensive."
Now consider that when Gawyn sets off her wards she is alone, no one else is in the room, just Egwene, waiting for Mesaana. She clearly thinks she can confront Mesaana 1:1 and come out victorious.
Personally I think she's being foolish, she's likely thinking in terms of their strength being close enough for Egwene to have a chance against a woman who is not a warrior, but realistically Mesaana should be far more skilled than Egwene.
In the end Mesaana was stupid and arrogant and played into Egwene's strength in TAR rather than attempt an OP duel ... odd, if as you say, she was so much stronger than Egwene, she could have easily finished the job this way. Why risk confronting a Dreamer in TAR when you should be able to manhandle her with your superior OP strength and knowledge?
As for Egwene facing Mesaana ... there are several comments around Egwene's plans and then there is the fact that she was alone when she thought Mesaana was coming for her.
Mesaana would need something grand to offset so many failures. Killing Egwene would work. That might send the White Tower back into division.
Gawyn had been mortified when she'd said she might use herself as bait. Dared she do so? She gripped the railing, standing above the Tower, above the city that depended on her, looking out on a world that needed her.
Something had to be done; Mesaana had to be drawn out. If what Saerin said was true, then the woman would be willing to fight directly—she wouldn't hide and poke from the shadows. Egwene's task, then, was to tempt her with an opportunity, one that didn't seem obvious, one she couldn't resist.
a plan which she shared with NO ONE
Then there is this:
She folded her arms beneath her breasts. He could almost feel the heat of her anger. "Your yelling has drawn half of the White Tower. They saw you captured. The assassin probably knows, now, about my weaves."
"Light, Egwene! You talk as if I did it on purpose. I was only trying to protect you."
"I didn't ask for your protection! I asked for your obedience! Gawyn, don't you see the opportunity we've missed? If you hadn't scared Mesaana away, she'd have walked into my traps!"
Making it even more clear that Egwene had a plan all her own ... you know as well as I do that an Amyrlin is not allowed to willingly put herself in danger so the Hall would never have approved of this.
then we have her direct statement:
"I have sisters researching everything we can find about Mesaana," Egwene continued. "She's not a warrior, Gawyn. She's an administrator, a planner. If I can confront her, I can defeat her. But we must find her first. Exposing myself is only one of my plans—and you are right, it is dangerous. But my precautions have been extensive."
Now consider that when Gawyn sets off her wards she is alone, no one else is in the room, just Egwene, waiting for Mesaana. She clearly thinks she can confront Mesaana 1:1 and come out victorious.
Personally I think she's being foolish, she's likely thinking in terms of their strength being close enough for Egwene to have a chance against a woman who is not a warrior, but realistically Mesaana should be far more skilled than Egwene.
In the end Mesaana was stupid and arrogant and played into Egwene's strength in TAR rather than attempt an OP duel ... odd, if as you say, she was so much stronger than Egwene, she could have easily finished the job this way. Why risk confronting a Dreamer in TAR when you should be able to manhandle her with your superior OP strength and knowledge?
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
- 15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
2545 Views
Hmm...
- 15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
1636 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
- 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
1489 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
1341 Views
- 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
1489 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
1341 Views
Re:
- 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
1561 Views
- 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
1561 Views
Re:
- 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
1402 Views
- 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
1402 Views
Re:
- 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
1387 Views
- 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
1387 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
1433 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
1602 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
1367 Views
Hmmm...
- 20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
1418 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
- 20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
1410 Views
Nope...
- 20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
1477 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
- 20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
1333 Views
Keep believing that...
- 20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
1470 Views
*shrugs*
- 20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
1451 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
- 20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
1351 Views
No it's the literary device
- 20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
1463 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
- 19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
1396 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
- 19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
1474 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
- 19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
1431 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
- 20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
862 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
- 20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
1332 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
- 16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
1331 Views
I don't really agree
- 18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
1309 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
- 19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
1343 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
- 20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
1335 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
- 17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
1405 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
- 18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
847 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
- 18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
1183 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
- 18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
1365 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
- 18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
1262 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
- 18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
1398 Views
Sure you can
- 18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
1387 Views
Re: Sure you can
- 18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
1376 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
- 19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
1342 Views
Oops, typo!
- 19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
1388 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
- 19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
1341 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
1252 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
1199 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
- 19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
1321 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
- 20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
1405 Views
Forkroot in every case
- 20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
1321 Views
No!
- 20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
1336 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
- 20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
1317 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
- 20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
1325 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
- 20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
1235 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
- 20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
1374 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
- 20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
1265 Views
Enough!
- 20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
1337 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
- 20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
836 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
- 20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
1349 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
- 20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
1349 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
1276 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
1327 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
1342 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
- 20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
1252 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
- 20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
1276 Views
Nope...
- 20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
1283 Views
wrong
- 20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
1249 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
- 20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
1327 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
- 20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
1318 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
- 20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
1214 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
- 20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
1378 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
- 19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
1396 Views
Indeed
- 19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
1421 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
- 20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
1297 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
- 20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
1310 Views
You continue to mix two things
- 20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
1225 Views
No
- 20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
1481 Views
You are mistaken
- 20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
1278 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
- 19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
1270 Views
It's irrelevant
- 19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
1351 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
- 19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
1313 Views
Daigian
- 19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
1313 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
- 19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
1365 Views
You missed my point
- 19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
1265 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
- 20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
1286 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
- 20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
1249 Views
Re: Sure you can
- 19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
1411 Views
Care to explain this...
- 19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
1205 Views
Indeed
- 20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
1419 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
- 20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
1292 Views
Well duh.
- 20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
1390 Views
Incorrect.
- 20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
1382 Views
No
- 20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
1357 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
- 20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
1331 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
- 20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
1169 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
- 20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
1367 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
- 20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
1253 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
- 20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
1316 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
- 20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
1407 Views
Well...
- 18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
1379 Views
Re: Well...
- 19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
1341 Views
Wow.
- 19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
1380 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
- 19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
1315 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
- 19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
1202 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
- 20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
1374 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
- 20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
1295 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
- 20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
1330 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
- 21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
1319 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
- 22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
1395 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
- 22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
1675 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
- 22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
1458 Views
