I'm through with you misrepresenting the quotes.
The tincture is given to her every hour, not once every few hours. At worst, it would take 2-4 hours for it to wear out.
At night, Egwene is sleeping, yes. But since Egwene has long since mastered to art of waking up in the middle of the night, and this is something most humans do, Silviana was obviously not going to design her captivity without taking this into account. Which brings up this quote:
If it is entirely obvious that two women are needed to shield Egwene, Katerine would not ask, and Silviana would not reply with "this child is tricky". She'd have wondered if Katerine had lost her senses to ask such an obvious question.
Lastly, of course, you still ignore the incident you quoted, where Egwene had been forkroot free for two days, yet Barasine alone held her. If Barasine knew there was no hope of her holding Egwene alone, she'd simply have followed the spindly Red sister, instead of waiting for Egwene to become safe by drinking forkroot. If you're going to continue to ignore this, don't bother with replying.
During the day, you will not be shielded at all. But every hour you will be given a mild tincture of forkroot.”
The tincture is given to her every hour, not once every few hours. At worst, it would take 2-4 hours for it to wear out.
At night, Egwene is sleeping, yes. But since Egwene has long since mastered to art of waking up in the middle of the night, and this is something most humans do, Silviana was obviously not going to design her captivity without taking this into account. Which brings up this quote:
Katerine and Barasine were startled to say the least at hearing Elaida’s plans for Egwene, and not best pleased to learn that they would be watching her and shielding her while she slept, although Silviana told them she would arrange for other sisters to come after an hour or two.
“Why both of us?” Katerine wanted to know, which earned her a wry glance from Barasine. If only one were sent, it surely would not be Katerine, who stood higher.
“Firstly, because I said so.” Silviana waited until the other two Reds nodded in acceptance. They did so with obvious reluctance, but not enough to make her wait long. She had not put on her shawl to come into the hallway, and in some odd fashion, she seemed the one out of place.
“And secondly, because this child is tricky, I think. I want her watched carefully awake or asleep. Which of you has her ring?”
“Why both of us?” Katerine wanted to know, which earned her a wry glance from Barasine. If only one were sent, it surely would not be Katerine, who stood higher.
“Firstly, because I said so.” Silviana waited until the other two Reds nodded in acceptance. They did so with obvious reluctance, but not enough to make her wait long. She had not put on her shawl to come into the hallway, and in some odd fashion, she seemed the one out of place.
“And secondly, because this child is tricky, I think. I want her watched carefully awake or asleep. Which of you has her ring?”
If it is entirely obvious that two women are needed to shield Egwene, Katerine would not ask, and Silviana would not reply with "this child is tricky". She'd have wondered if Katerine had lost her senses to ask such an obvious question.
Lastly, of course, you still ignore the incident you quoted, where Egwene had been forkroot free for two days, yet Barasine alone held her. If Barasine knew there was no hope of her holding Egwene alone, she'd simply have followed the spindly Red sister, instead of waiting for Egwene to become safe by drinking forkroot. If you're going to continue to ignore this, don't bother with replying.
How many standard deviations is Lanfear
- 15/11/2012 06:04:39 PM
2510 Views
Hmm...
- 15/11/2012 07:25:34 PM
1603 Views
see we CAN agree on stuff
- 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
1450 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
1302 Views
- 15/11/2012 07:56:12 PM
1450 Views
- 18/11/2012 08:37:22 PM
1302 Views
Re:
- 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
1527 Views
- 18/11/2012 11:07:17 PM
1527 Views
Re:
- 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
1364 Views
- 19/11/2012 05:16:00 AM
1364 Views
Re:
- 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
1353 Views
- 19/11/2012 03:13:01 PM
1353 Views
They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 03:19:19 PM
1394 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 04:01:43 PM
1573 Views
Re: They only reject 37.5%, not 62.5%
- 19/11/2012 09:04:04 PM
1339 Views
Hmmm...
- 20/11/2012 02:08:40 AM
1391 Views
Perhaps, but Egwene is also being a bit dramatic in the scene as she managed
- 20/11/2012 04:28:57 AM
1372 Views
Nope...
- 20/11/2012 03:13:13 PM
1442 Views
I believe she is being over dramatic
- 20/11/2012 03:26:24 PM
1286 Views
Keep believing that...
- 20/11/2012 03:30:14 PM
1438 Views
*shrugs*
- 20/11/2012 03:49:10 PM
1413 Views
Tired and forkroot are the same now?
- 20/11/2012 03:55:22 PM
1312 Views
No it's the literary device
- 20/11/2012 04:04:28 PM
1428 Views
Impossible. Daigian is exactly 0.32SD below the mean
- 19/11/2012 11:06:04 AM
1354 Views
You keep saying that, but it is either a linear or a non-linear distribution
- 19/11/2012 09:09:32 PM
1440 Views
That's the whole point. Thanks for finally seeing it.
- 19/11/2012 09:43:27 PM
1395 Views
keep believing that ... but you making up numbers isn't really relevant *NM*
- 20/11/2012 04:29:44 AM
844 Views
Please show me a number that is made up. The 0.32SD for Daigian is a rule of statistics.
- 20/11/2012 07:15:48 AM
1297 Views
Ugh. I hate power level discussions. For real world applications, it should be kind of meaningless
- 16/11/2012 10:28:49 PM
1294 Views
I don't really agree
- 18/11/2012 08:40:53 PM
1269 Views
Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
- 19/11/2012 09:13:48 PM
1306 Views
Re: Perhaps, but we've seen that a MUCH weaker Channeler can win in a duel
- 20/11/2012 08:10:01 AM
1292 Views
Since I've proven that it's not a normal distribution in units of absolute strength, SDs don't apply
- 17/11/2012 07:48:21 PM
1367 Views
You have proven nothing, except that you have an opinion *NM*
- 18/11/2012 02:21:35 AM
828 Views
You simply don't get it. It is mathematically a fact. There is no opinion involved.
- 18/11/2012 02:19:40 PM
1157 Views
Only because you've assigned numeric values. That you created.
- 18/11/2012 02:40:51 PM
1337 Views
It doesn't matter what figure you use...
- 18/11/2012 03:01:56 PM
1227 Views
What if Daigian is one third Lanfear's strength?
- 18/11/2012 04:37:58 PM
1364 Views
Sure you can
- 18/11/2012 10:09:31 PM
1353 Views
Re: Sure you can
- 18/11/2012 10:54:50 PM
1339 Views
You're right, though its 37.5%
- 19/11/2012 12:21:29 AM
1306 Views
Oops, typo!
- 19/11/2012 02:54:25 AM
1350 Views
Again, not possible, due to Daigian being just 0.3SD below the Mean
- 19/11/2012 08:37:01 AM
1305 Views
Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 19/11/2012 04:05:12 PM
1216 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 19/11/2012 05:55:02 PM
1166 Views
Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
- 19/11/2012 09:19:50 PM
1283 Views
Re: Egwene is about as strong as Melaine and Amys combined
- 20/11/2012 02:11:26 AM
1360 Views
Forkroot in every case
- 20/11/2012 04:32:26 AM
1287 Views
No!
- 20/11/2012 03:15:16 PM
1291 Views
I'm not going to go re-read the books to you on this
- 20/11/2012 03:39:46 PM
1283 Views
You need to read it for yourself, since you're completely confused.
- 20/11/2012 03:54:26 PM
1294 Views
Not going to argue this with you.
- 20/11/2012 04:09:44 PM
1201 Views
Your own example disproved your point...
- 20/11/2012 04:39:25 PM
1348 Views
let's see, she's both asleep and would need hours to regain her strength
- 20/11/2012 04:43:17 PM
1234 Views
Enough!
- 20/11/2012 05:04:06 PM
1304 Views
LOL ... whatever. You go on believing that ... no one else sees it this way. *NM*
- 20/11/2012 05:20:52 PM
820 Views
Re: Your own example disproved your point...
- 20/11/2012 05:10:15 PM
1317 Views
Barasine + Katerine isn't that much less than
- 20/11/2012 05:26:31 PM
1321 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 02:26:47 AM
1240 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 09:03:40 AM
1277 Views
Re: Egwene is definitely not 2x Amys...
- 20/11/2012 02:59:08 PM
1304 Views
None of this is backed by any evidence...
- 20/11/2012 03:24:12 PM
1216 Views
who said Cadsuane was 1.5x Moiraine or more?
- 20/11/2012 04:03:13 PM
1240 Views
Nope...
- 20/11/2012 04:41:35 PM
1242 Views
wrong
- 20/11/2012 04:48:50 PM
1219 Views
Better evidence? LOL!
- 20/11/2012 03:18:55 PM
1294 Views
Huh? How did you come to that conclusion?
- 20/11/2012 04:40:56 PM
1278 Views
BEcause Cadsuane is close on the heels of Egwene?
- 20/11/2012 05:10:50 PM
1179 Views
I'm not arguing that. I agree that Cadsuane is pretty close to Egwene
- 20/11/2012 05:50:34 PM
1337 Views
Interesting, but let's go with your figures...
- 19/11/2012 06:54:54 AM
1364 Views
Indeed
- 19/11/2012 08:16:44 AM
1386 Views
Rand is sort of a special case
- 20/11/2012 04:25:02 AM
1257 Views
Regarding Mesaana...
- 20/11/2012 08:42:56 AM
1281 Views
You continue to mix two things
- 20/11/2012 03:24:44 PM
1192 Views
No
- 20/11/2012 04:54:19 PM
1447 Views
You are mistaken
- 20/11/2012 05:04:40 PM
1252 Views
Probably, but the AS have no idea what 37.5% means
- 19/11/2012 02:59:26 AM
1235 Views
It's irrelevant
- 19/11/2012 03:46:42 AM
1314 Views
Agreed. Daigian is the marker of the absolute bottom of Aes Sedai strength.
- 19/11/2012 06:55:41 AM
1277 Views
Daigian
- 19/11/2012 08:12:19 AM
1273 Views
It is a direct marker due to RJ's quote
- 19/11/2012 08:50:26 AM
1327 Views
You missed my point
- 19/11/2012 09:08:42 AM
1236 Views
Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
- 20/11/2012 04:41:11 AM
1246 Views
Re: Asmodean would never have made the comment about 13 weakest AS
- 20/11/2012 09:07:49 AM
1213 Views
Re: Sure you can
- 19/11/2012 09:22:09 AM
1382 Views
Care to explain this...
- 19/11/2012 05:06:28 PM
1173 Views
Indeed
- 20/11/2012 07:16:37 AM
1385 Views
Explained far better than I ever could. Bravo.
- 20/11/2012 07:30:29 AM
1255 Views
Well duh.
- 20/11/2012 02:57:24 PM
1349 Views
Incorrect.
- 20/11/2012 04:28:07 PM
1355 Views
No
- 20/11/2012 04:44:16 PM
1322 Views
You're integrating without lower limits...
- 20/11/2012 02:55:06 PM
1298 Views
We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
- 20/11/2012 04:44:24 AM
1138 Views
Re: We are not talking about a normal distribution in any case
- 20/11/2012 07:02:47 AM
1331 Views
You must tell me of this special math...
- 20/11/2012 03:10:09 PM
1209 Views
Re: You must tell me of this special math...
- 20/11/2012 04:29:40 PM
1284 Views
Morghase is a placeholder...
- 20/11/2012 04:45:42 PM
1371 Views
Well...
- 18/11/2012 08:43:59 PM
1341 Views
Re: Well...
- 19/11/2012 03:40:44 PM
1316 Views
Wow.
- 19/11/2012 03:53:47 PM
1344 Views
Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
- 19/11/2012 06:09:36 PM
1277 Views
Re: Well then you're both wrong I'm afraid
- 19/11/2012 07:42:58 PM
1163 Views
this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
- 20/11/2012 04:51:20 AM
1349 Views
Re: this is why I think all of the Forsaken are very close in Power
- 20/11/2012 02:45:18 PM
1268 Views
I think RJ went out of his way to keep strength a bit of a mystery
- 20/11/2012 08:42:44 PM
1299 Views
Math gurus...Is it possible to find the missing variable...
- 21/11/2012 05:12:24 PM
1289 Views
the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
- 22/11/2012 02:55:03 AM
1359 Views
Re: the problem is that the Mean is not going to tell us much really
- 22/11/2012 03:15:33 AM
1643 Views
I do not think you can calculate the Mean without knowing the Units of Power
- 22/11/2012 03:53:59 AM
1422 Views
