Active Users:784 Time:15/12/2025 02:11:52 AM
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... Gerbeaud Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM
We have e.g. "Brother Jim" or "Sister Jane", which implies that they are equal to a person of any status, or "Father John", which even implies a certain superiority. And even the translation of Asha'man with Guardians, implies that an Asha'man is more powerful than you.

Thus, it's a bit curious that the proud and aloof nowadays Aes Sedai still demand to be called servant by lesser persons, although the title "servant" automatically implies a lesser status.

But of course you are right that it's in tradition with the AoL, and therefore understandable (though other traditions were changed as well).


The impression I get is that in the AOL Aes Sedai were indeed more engaged in serving the common good. Yes, they were powerful individuals and respected by non-channelers but the goal of the Hall of the Servants was to serve. As oppposed to the current crop of Aes Sedai, many of whom appear more interested in maintain their own sense of importance and prestige. Of course, some of the current age Aes Sedai are engaged in healing and resolving disputes but many stay in the Tower and devote their energies to political wrangling and petty plots.
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1554 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 841 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 811 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 788 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 676 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 678 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 704 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 683 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 696 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 709 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 657 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 758 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 821 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 924 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 831 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 822 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 807 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 787 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 776 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 813 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 783 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 812 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 758 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 740 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 717 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 660 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 649 Views

Reply to Message