Active Users:469 Time:02/05/2025 10:59:06 PM
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... Gerbeaud Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM
We have e.g. "Brother Jim" or "Sister Jane", which implies that they are equal to a person of any status, or "Father John", which even implies a certain superiority. And even the translation of Asha'man with Guardians, implies that an Asha'man is more powerful than you.

Thus, it's a bit curious that the proud and aloof nowadays Aes Sedai still demand to be called servant by lesser persons, although the title "servant" automatically implies a lesser status.

But of course you are right that it's in tradition with the AoL, and therefore understandable (though other traditions were changed as well).


The impression I get is that in the AOL Aes Sedai were indeed more engaged in serving the common good. Yes, they were powerful individuals and respected by non-channelers but the goal of the Hall of the Servants was to serve. As oppposed to the current crop of Aes Sedai, many of whom appear more interested in maintain their own sense of importance and prestige. Of course, some of the current age Aes Sedai are engaged in healing and resolving disputes but many stay in the Tower and devote their energies to political wrangling and petty plots.
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1452 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 742 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 735 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 705 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 608 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 582 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 629 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 617 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 597 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 631 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 577 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 662 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 725 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 815 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 727 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 708 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 703 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 710 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 686 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 723 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 685 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 700 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 653 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 659 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 628 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 569 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 564 Views

Reply to Message