Active Users:2216 Time:22/07/2026 06:50:40 AM
Correction... Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM
... I meant that I did not believe it was possible for the entire Slayer construct to enter in the flesh. I believed that his power was that he was split into two people - Luc in the waking world, Isam in the Dreamworld. Obviously Isam would be there 'in the flesh', because he no longer exists in the waking world. This would also correspond with the 'one did live and one did die, but both are' Dark Prophecy.

I never said he was an ordinary Dreamwalker, I said his ability to enter the Dreamworld was similar to an ordinary Dreamwalker, and that's what the evidence showed.

How you can believe at that point that Slayer could travel in the real world by jumping through the Dreamworld is beyond me. If he could do that, why would he travel back to Emond's Field - where Perrin is - when his purpose is to flee from Perrin?
The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 2051 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 840 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 877 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 1002 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 716 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 994 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 820 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 356 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 608 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 703 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 737 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 748 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 716 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 718 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 721 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 643 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 685 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 719 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 686 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 777 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 799 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 742 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 694 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 727 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 734 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 696 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 694 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 750 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 664 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 717 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 675 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 737 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 339 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 734 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 690 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 644 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 626 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 790 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 340 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 691 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 714 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 713 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 694 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 661 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 793 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 692 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 696 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 351 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 686 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 603 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 633 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 654 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 654 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 704 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 666 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 698 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 653 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 631 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 746 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 639 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 648 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 650 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 641 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 317 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 665 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 309 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 674 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 653 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 698 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 329 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 312 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 704 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 644 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 708 Views

Reply to Message