Active Users:1256 Time:16/09/2025 03:44:59 AM
One last time... Etzel Send a noteboard - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM
You can either enter TAR in the dream or in the flesh (some can do both). If you enter TAR in the flesh, you are there in the flesh. Slayer/Luc is in TAR in the flesh and thus entered TAR in the flesh before. If you can enter TAR in the flesh, you can naturally do it everywhere in the Real World, similar to leaving TAR at any location. From this ability, obviously given by the DO, and Slayer's apparent profession as hitman/assassin/bounty hunter for the Shadow, one can also deduce the other things, e.g. that Slayer likely killed the BA or the Gray Man.

Nothing necessarily indicates that Slayer is a Dreamwalker. I explained why it makes sense that he went back to Emond's Field, after he was shot. And obviously this also wasn't meant as a clue by RJ to indicate that Slayer is a Dreamwalker, contrary to what Hopper said, because Slayer actually uses TAR in the flesh. You simply interpreted this scene wrongly.
This message last edited by Etzel on 31/03/2010 at 09:25:54 AM
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1890 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 682 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 715 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 801 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 568 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 816 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 643 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 268 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 501 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 534 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 565 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 575 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 556 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 555 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 552 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 507 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 534 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 543 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 536 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 590 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 590 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 559 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 541 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 571 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 557 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 534 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 539 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 576 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 522 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 550 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 528 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 573 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 272 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 601 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 534 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 499 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 487 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 628 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 257 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 541 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 546 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 551 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 536 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 520 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 627 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 535 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 531 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 265 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 520 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 468 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 481 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 500 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 491 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 521 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 495 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 519 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 498 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 487 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 583 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 480 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 508 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 489 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 500 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 232 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 499 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 230 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 502 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 511 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 557 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 244 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 219 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 526 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 491 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 544 Views

Reply to Message