Active Users:947 Time:02/11/2025 02:59:05 AM
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM
someone would have had to send him ... which we cannot know prior to the events of LOC is part of how things work with Slayer. His involvement adds another layer to the mystery

such as:

1. how would anyone know where to find Asmo in the first place? The crime is way too opportunistic for to have been planned out.

2. why would any of the FS bother to send Slayer after Asmo? There is no gain in it for them to kill him off via the use of Slayer. Sure seeing him dead would be good for them, but ultimately it seems like a lot of work just to kill him off.

3. RJ foreshadowed it being one of the FS earlier in the book when Asmo tells Rand that any of the FS "would kill him on sight"

Slayer as the killer feels like a red herring to me ... seems obvious at first, but once you do even the smallest digging the whole house of cards collapses.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1930 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 698 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 745 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 829 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 585 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 853 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 680 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 281 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 525 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 558 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 609 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 607 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 583 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 583 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 586 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 529 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 552 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 567 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 565 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 614 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 631 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 584 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 561 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 602 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 575 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 554 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 562 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 607 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 543 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 572 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 545 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 598 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 278 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 621 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 554 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 522 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 505 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 654 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 269 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 565 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 582 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 570 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 555 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 545 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 661 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 555 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 555 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 278 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 551 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 482 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 503 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 520 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 530 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 550 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 520 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 557 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 518 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 504 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 605 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 493 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 530 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 521 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 518 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 245 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 526 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 239 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 527 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 533 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 571 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 258 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 231 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 561 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 511 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 568 Views

Reply to Message