We shouldn't have to force every book to meet those criteria.
I actually see it more as an engaging project- finding, reading and discussing books that could been seen as cross-over works if we weren't so determined to set them into a genre. Keep everyone satisfied, while reading the more substantive spec fiction, less frequently breaking for a relaxing fix or stepping up to a serious novel.
Imo, I read enough serious works on my own- imagining discussing some of them with the likes of you, Camilla, Rebekah, Shrike, etc is quite a daunting prospect. Imo, if you go too far in stressing "other literature," you'll narrow it down to more of an elite club rather than providing enough content for another board. I'm not saying that's necessarily bad, just that it is not the reason people come here. That is why I favor keeping it broader, with emphasis on sci-fi/fantasy, and seeing how we grow in the future.
In Support of Other Fiction
01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM
- 2164 Views
01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM
- 1238 Views

Re:
01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM
- 1219 Views

you shouldn't feel the need to defend a non SF/F suggestion, just don't
03/12/2009 03:34:28 PM
- 1221 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM
- 1139 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality.
01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM
- 1245 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That.
01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM
- 1274 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point.
02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM
- 1229 Views
perhaps some university will do a study
03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM
- 1202 Views
I'd like to see it
03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM
- 1248 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This.
03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM
- 1152 Views
I'd like to see it.
03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM
- 1206 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan
03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM
- 1175 Views
I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM
- 1163 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM
- 1271 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM
- 1167 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM
- 1198 Views
It would. Destroying the Wheel would likely make him a Buddhist.
03/12/2009 10:51:17 PM
- 1172 Views
I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM
- 1254 Views

Re: I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM
- 1242 Views

I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative.
04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM
- 1325 Views
Re: Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
02/12/2009 12:28:30 AM
- 1195 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time
01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM
- 1287 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer???
03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM
- 1248 Views
Nice post.
02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM
- 1295 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half...
02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM
- 1300 Views

Popcorn?
02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM
- 1232 Views
I'm glad I could drive you from your Carthusian retreat, Larry
02/12/2009 01:58:49 AM
- 1233 Views

It won't last for long - have too many things still to deal with in my life
02/12/2009 02:36:15 AM
- 1234 Views

That's too bad. I'll have to learn monasterial sign language to continue a dialogue.
02/12/2009 03:49:01 AM
- 1180 Views
I concur
02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM
- 1161 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing).
02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM
- 1237 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun?
02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM
- 1281 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason.
02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM
- 1180 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school,
02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM
- 1155 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows
03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM
- 1102 Views
WoT has decent characterization, though a little overwrought. Harrington... not so much.
04/12/2009 04:26:43 AM
- 1352 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie.
02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM
- 1245 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous.
02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM
- 1273 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting.
02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM
- 1186 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that.
02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM
- 1111 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though.
03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM
- 1109 Views
Which brings us back to my point.
03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM
- 1227 Views
I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 05:24:02 PM
- 1120 Views
Re: I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 10:42:33 PM
- 1142 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category
02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM
- 1235 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today
02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM
- 1179 Views
"Pertinent", not "Pertinant". If it weren't in all caps I'd have ignored it this time.
02/12/2009 02:13:36 AM
- 1221 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive
02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM
- 1172 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction?
02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM
- 1143 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way?
02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM
- 1152 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing.
02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM
- 1158 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"?
02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM
- 1147 Views

Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay*
02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM
- 1302 Views
I was born in the Midwest.
02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
- 1202 Views
I know.
02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM
- 1137 Views
...!
02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM
- 1149 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM
- 1167 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM
- 1116 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist.
02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM
- 1145 Views
Read what you like to read.
02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM
- 1243 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM*
02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM
- 569 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat!
02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM
- 1162 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve.
02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM
- 1192 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though.
02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM
- 1266 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM
- 1159 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM
- 1231 Views
I really did get under your skin
02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM
- 1099 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass.
03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM
- 1177 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care.
03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM
- 1130 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness.
03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM
- 1148 Views
Hm.
02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM
- 1758 Views
Re-read my exact point.
02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM
- 1100 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential.
02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM
- 1258 Views
There may have been an assumption about literature due to the reason for the post.
02/12/2009 02:37:47 PM
- 1176 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy
02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM
- 1260 Views
As I see it...
02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM
- 1155 Views
Yep.
02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM
- 1297 Views
Re: Yep.
02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM
- 1162 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially.
02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM
- 1079 Views
I wasn't looking to generate controversy
02/12/2009 02:19:13 PM
- 1280 Views
Well... then I'm going to have to agree with Craig a bit.
02/12/2009 02:32:59 PM
- 1263 Views
Well, I was being somewhat denigrating. "Unnecessarily" or not is a matter of debate.
02/12/2009 02:40:29 PM
- 1124 Views
Well, it's only "unnecessary" if you don't want people to be turned off of your message immediately. *NM*
02/12/2009 09:42:46 PM
- 561 Views
Judging from the responses, most people weren't turned off immediately.
02/12/2009 09:59:35 PM
- 1086 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity.
02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM
- 1141 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no.
02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM
- 1124 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic
02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM
- 1140 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me.
03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM
- 1096 Views
You're playing a game.
03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM
- 1179 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction.
03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM
- 1165 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies?
02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM
- 1086 Views
Bulgakov
02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM
- 1155 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM
- 1124 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM
- 1075 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM
- 1119 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM
- 1167 Views
I suppose.
02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM
- 1156 Views
Re: I suppose.
02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM
- 1160 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier.
02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM
- 1195 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist.
02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM
- 1151 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction
02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM
- 1227 Views

Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler.
02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
- 1206 Views
There's an interesting book in Russian that might be translated somewhere.
02/12/2009 10:02:48 PM
- 1224 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre.
02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM
- 1177 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points.
02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM
- 1125 Views
the illiad is a classic
02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM
- 1161 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad
02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM
- 1129 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree
02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM
- 1125 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post!
02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM
- 1144 Views

Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree.
02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM
- 1249 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read.
02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM
- 1216 Views

Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this.
02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM
- 1171 Views
Heh
02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM
- 1172 Views
I have a few objections.
03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM
- 1180 Views
where else should we talk about it?
03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM
- 1142 Views
There's a difference between having threads about it and focusing the official book club on it.
03/12/2009 12:40:53 AM
- 1232 Views
This is the Sci-Fi and Fantasy Board for site optimization purposes.
03/12/2009 01:07:39 AM
- 14178 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line
03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 1199 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy
03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM
- 1207 Views
That's it
03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM
- 1264 Views

Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following:
03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM
- 1181 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM*
03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM
- 478 Views
Yes, it is but actually...
03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM
- 1167 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!!
*NM*
03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM
- 583 Views

another thing wrong with your argument
03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM
- 1154 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad.
03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM
- 972 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling
(including the one on pertinent)
03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM
- 1279 Views

is it just me, or is this now the largest post/thread yet on RAFO.com??? 168 replies so far! *NM*
03/12/2009 05:03:25 PM
- 522 Views
Congratulations on the replies count
03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM
- 1281 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM
- 1191 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM
- 1212 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured.
04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM
- 1138 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book?
06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM
- 1294 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM
- 1155 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM
- 1155 Views
I've obviously missed the show here...
04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM
- 1112 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing.
04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM
- 1227 Views
What, your penis?
06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM
- 1124 Views
Don't you know it!
06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM
- 1028 Views

You talk the talk, that's for sure.
07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM
- 1174 Views

Metaphor versus literalism
04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM
- 1200 Views
Metaphor divorced from the reality runs risks, however.
04/12/2009 10:25:47 PM
- 1111 Views
Honestly, the moral can always be dismissed as inapplicable if you want to dismiss it.
05/12/2009 12:16:39 AM
- 1142 Views
While that's true, it's much harder to just dismiss Mockingbird.
05/12/2009 03:57:42 AM
- 1122 Views
Then why read fiction at all? It's all a diversion.
05/12/2009 04:16:06 PM
- 1114 Views
I think people should read non-fiction, and The Nine Hundred Days is an excellent book.
05/12/2009 04:41:50 PM
- 1106 Views
aha. but.
07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM
- 1318 Views