However, I will repeat a statement that I’ve made several times in the past: Reading science fiction and fantasy is sort of like eating fast food. There’s nothing wrong with it in moderation, but when it dominates what you read, you sit back after the fact, disgusted with yourself and say, “What have I done?”
If that's what it's like for you... cool. That's great. Read to grow, ain't no one gonna stop you. Doesn't apply to me.
I read because I like to read. Full stop. Telling me that my taste in literature is "not going to help me grow" is like telling me that my taste in music won't help me find a deeper relationship with God. Don't care. ~shrug~
EDIT: Apparently I'm cranky tonight. I still stand by what I said, though.

I am made of poison.
This message last edited by Craig on 02/12/2009 at 04:53:10 AM
In Support of Other Fiction
01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM
- 2202 Views
01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM
- 1274 Views

Re:
01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM
- 1248 Views

you shouldn't feel the need to defend a non SF/F suggestion, just don't
03/12/2009 03:34:28 PM
- 1254 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM
- 1175 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality.
01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM
- 1275 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That.
01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM
- 1309 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point.
02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM
- 1262 Views
perhaps some university will do a study
03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM
- 1238 Views
I'd like to see it
03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM
- 1282 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This.
03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM
- 1182 Views
I'd like to see it.
03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM
- 1234 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan
03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM
- 1209 Views
I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM
- 1199 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM
- 1299 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM
- 1195 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM
- 1222 Views
It would. Destroying the Wheel would likely make him a Buddhist.
03/12/2009 10:51:17 PM
- 1205 Views
I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM
- 1290 Views

Re: I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM
- 1278 Views

I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative.
04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM
- 1371 Views
Re: Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
02/12/2009 12:28:30 AM
- 1234 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time
01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM
- 1314 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer???
03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM
- 1280 Views
Nice post.
02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM
- 1331 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half...
02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM
- 1333 Views

Popcorn?
02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM
- 1260 Views
I'm glad I could drive you from your Carthusian retreat, Larry
02/12/2009 01:58:49 AM
- 1262 Views

It won't last for long - have too many things still to deal with in my life
02/12/2009 02:36:15 AM
- 1270 Views

That's too bad. I'll have to learn monasterial sign language to continue a dialogue.
02/12/2009 03:49:01 AM
- 1219 Views
I concur
02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM
- 1193 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing).
02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM
- 1275 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun?
02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM
- 1314 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason.
02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM
- 1210 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school,
02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM
- 1191 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows
03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM
- 1138 Views
WoT has decent characterization, though a little overwrought. Harrington... not so much.
04/12/2009 04:26:43 AM
- 1386 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie.
02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM
- 1274 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous.
02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM
- 1304 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting.
02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM
- 1219 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that.
02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM
- 1144 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though.
03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM
- 1138 Views
Which brings us back to my point.
03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM
- 1258 Views
I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 05:24:02 PM
- 1156 Views
Re: I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 10:42:33 PM
- 1173 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category
02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM
- 1267 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today
02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM
- 1209 Views
"Pertinent", not "Pertinant". If it weren't in all caps I'd have ignored it this time.
02/12/2009 02:13:36 AM
- 1246 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive
02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM
- 1200 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction?
02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM
- 1178 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way?
02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM
- 1183 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing.
02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM
- 1190 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"?
02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM
- 1180 Views

Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay*
02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM
- 1335 Views
I was born in the Midwest.
02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
- 1236 Views
I know.
02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM
- 1170 Views
...!
02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM
- 1178 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM
- 1198 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM
- 1154 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist.
02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM
- 1177 Views
Read what you like to read.
02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM
- 1276 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM*
02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM
- 587 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat!
02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM
- 1192 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve.
02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM
- 1225 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though.
02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM
- 1303 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM
- 1194 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM
- 1269 Views
I really did get under your skin
02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM
- 1130 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass.
03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM
- 1208 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care.
03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM
- 1167 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness.
03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM
- 1178 Views
Hm.
02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM
- 1795 Views
Re-read my exact point.
02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM
- 1145 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential.
02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM
- 1291 Views
There may have been an assumption about literature due to the reason for the post.
02/12/2009 02:37:47 PM
- 1206 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy
02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM
- 1290 Views
As I see it...
02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM
- 1186 Views
Yep.
02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM
- 1333 Views
Re: Yep.
02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM
- 1191 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially.
02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM
- 1115 Views
I wasn't looking to generate controversy
02/12/2009 02:19:13 PM
- 1312 Views
Well... then I'm going to have to agree with Craig a bit.
02/12/2009 02:32:59 PM
- 1299 Views
Well, I was being somewhat denigrating. "Unnecessarily" or not is a matter of debate.
02/12/2009 02:40:29 PM
- 1158 Views
Well, it's only "unnecessary" if you don't want people to be turned off of your message immediately. *NM*
02/12/2009 09:42:46 PM
- 580 Views
Judging from the responses, most people weren't turned off immediately.
02/12/2009 09:59:35 PM
- 1121 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity.
02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM
- 1173 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no.
02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM
- 1159 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic
02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM
- 1176 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me.
03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM
- 1121 Views
You're playing a game.
03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM
- 1210 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction.
03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM
- 1196 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies?
02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM
- 1116 Views
Bulgakov
02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM
- 1190 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM
- 1184 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM
- 1105 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM
- 1145 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM
- 1200 Views
I suppose.
02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM
- 1189 Views
Re: I suppose.
02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM
- 1192 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier.
02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM
- 1226 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist.
02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM
- 1184 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction
02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM
- 1263 Views

Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler.
02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
- 1243 Views
There's an interesting book in Russian that might be translated somewhere.
02/12/2009 10:02:48 PM
- 1250 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre.
02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM
- 1207 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points.
02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM
- 1160 Views
the illiad is a classic
02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM
- 1194 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad
02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM
- 1159 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree
02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM
- 1154 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post!
02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM
- 1177 Views

Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree.
02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM
- 1278 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read.
02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM
- 1246 Views

Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this.
02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM
- 1207 Views
Heh
02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM
- 1203 Views
I have a few objections.
03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM
- 1234 Views
where else should we talk about it?
03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM
- 1173 Views
There's a difference between having threads about it and focusing the official book club on it.
03/12/2009 12:40:53 AM
- 1279 Views
This is the Sci-Fi and Fantasy Board for site optimization purposes.
03/12/2009 01:07:39 AM
- 14207 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line
03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 1232 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy
03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM
- 1238 Views
That's it
03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM
- 1295 Views

Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following:
03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM
- 1211 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM*
03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM
- 497 Views
Yes, it is but actually...
03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM
- 1205 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!!
*NM*
03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM
- 602 Views

another thing wrong with your argument
03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM
- 1188 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad.
03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM
- 1003 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling
(including the one on pertinent)
03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM
- 1307 Views

is it just me, or is this now the largest post/thread yet on RAFO.com??? 168 replies so far! *NM*
03/12/2009 05:03:25 PM
- 541 Views
Congratulations on the replies count
03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM
- 1313 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM
- 1222 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM
- 1243 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured.
04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM
- 1168 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book?
06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM
- 1326 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM
- 1186 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM
- 1186 Views
I've obviously missed the show here...
04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM
- 1144 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing.
04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM
- 1260 Views
What, your penis?
06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM
- 1155 Views
Don't you know it!
06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM
- 1058 Views

You talk the talk, that's for sure.
07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM
- 1208 Views

Metaphor versus literalism
04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM
- 1232 Views
Metaphor divorced from the reality runs risks, however.
04/12/2009 10:25:47 PM
- 1142 Views
Honestly, the moral can always be dismissed as inapplicable if you want to dismiss it.
05/12/2009 12:16:39 AM
- 1171 Views
While that's true, it's much harder to just dismiss Mockingbird.
05/12/2009 03:57:42 AM
- 1147 Views
Then why read fiction at all? It's all a diversion.
05/12/2009 04:16:06 PM
- 1149 Views
I think people should read non-fiction, and The Nine Hundred Days is an excellent book.
05/12/2009 04:41:50 PM
- 1138 Views
aha. but.
07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM
- 1364 Views