As the work puts more and more distance between itself and reality, the risk of becoming simply a "diversion" increases. Certainly, the reader should be on the lookout for deeper messages, but that having been said, it's hard to really expect a deeper message from a lot of authors in the genre.
Jordan certainly provided a diversion and little more. The interesting thing is that Sanderson's novels show a much higher level of insight and thought, and so the series might end a bit "deeper", so to speak, than it would have if Jordan had written it.
To take the analogy of dwarves and racism, while such a story could prove a point, it also distances people from the historical realities of racism in the real world, which robs the issue of much of its complexity. On the one hand, it may make certain ideas about the inherent injustice in racism plain to people who wouldn't have thought about it that way, but on the other hand, many could dismiss it or see it as inapplicable to a real-world situation where they or their friends may be more emotionally involved. Of course, it might be very interesting to read.
The real point of this post is to try to encourage people to go beyond reading simply fantasy and science fiction because an incomparably large portion of it is little more than diversion. If it stirred a healthy debate, all the better. If people start to analyse their reading choices and wonder, "Am I missing something?" then they benefit.
Jordan certainly provided a diversion and little more. The interesting thing is that Sanderson's novels show a much higher level of insight and thought, and so the series might end a bit "deeper", so to speak, than it would have if Jordan had written it.
To take the analogy of dwarves and racism, while such a story could prove a point, it also distances people from the historical realities of racism in the real world, which robs the issue of much of its complexity. On the one hand, it may make certain ideas about the inherent injustice in racism plain to people who wouldn't have thought about it that way, but on the other hand, many could dismiss it or see it as inapplicable to a real-world situation where they or their friends may be more emotionally involved. Of course, it might be very interesting to read.
The real point of this post is to try to encourage people to go beyond reading simply fantasy and science fiction because an incomparably large portion of it is little more than diversion. If it stirred a healthy debate, all the better. If people start to analyse their reading choices and wonder, "Am I missing something?" then they benefit.
Fair enough, and a laudable goal. I personally think there's a lot more to WoT than just diversion though. There's meat on those bones, and not just in terms of making contortionists out of tropes (though that's a fine example since most people don't really think about what those tropes symbolize unless they've spent some time with Campbell.) You can't tell me you read the debates between Rand and the others over whether to torture Semi and don't see something... familiar.... A lot of people won't, just as a lot of people would dismiss the parallels between demihuman and racial bigotry, but, once again, who's fault is that? I'm sure Stalin would be quick to tell you Animal Farm got it all wrong, too, but I doubt you'd be convinced.
The thread will have to wait until I both have a chance to pick out all the more serious things I think Jordan has to say and have finished tonights shift.
In Support of Other Fiction
01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM
- 2017 Views
01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM
- 1093 Views
Re:
01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM
- 1058 Views
you shouldn't feel the need to defend a non SF/F suggestion, just don't
03/12/2009 03:34:28 PM
- 1081 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM
- 990 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality.
01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM
- 1065 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That.
01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM
- 1127 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point.
02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM
- 1071 Views
perhaps some university will do a study
03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM
- 1027 Views
I'd like to see it
03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM
- 1081 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This.
03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM
- 984 Views
I'd like to see it.
03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM
- 1045 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan
03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM
- 1056 Views
I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM
- 1027 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too
03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM
- 1121 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM
- 1010 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless.
03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM
- 1042 Views
It would. Destroying the Wheel would likely make him a Buddhist.
03/12/2009 10:51:17 PM
- 1022 Views
I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM
- 1098 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That.
04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM
- 1086 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative.
04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM
- 1169 Views
Re: Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction.
02/12/2009 12:28:30 AM
- 1048 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time
01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM
- 1135 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer???
03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM
- 1089 Views
Nice post.
02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM
- 1136 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half...
02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM
- 1150 Views
Popcorn?
02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM
- 1071 Views
I'm glad I could drive you from your Carthusian retreat, Larry
02/12/2009 01:58:49 AM
- 1069 Views
It won't last for long - have too many things still to deal with in my life
02/12/2009 02:36:15 AM
- 1068 Views
That's too bad. I'll have to learn monasterial sign language to continue a dialogue.
02/12/2009 03:49:01 AM
- 1024 Views
I concur
02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM
- 1022 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing).
02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM
- 1085 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun?
02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM
- 1138 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason.
02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM
- 1043 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school,
02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM
- 1008 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows
03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM
- 942 Views
WoT has decent characterization, though a little overwrought. Harrington... not so much.
04/12/2009 04:26:43 AM
- 1195 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie.
02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM
- 1105 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous.
02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM
- 1142 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting.
02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM
- 1036 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that.
02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM
- 958 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though.
03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM
- 955 Views
Which brings us back to my point.
03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM
- 1089 Views
I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 05:24:02 PM
- 971 Views
Re: I would like to see the study and statistics that produced this answer.
04/12/2009 10:42:33 PM
- 999 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category
02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM
- 1085 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today
02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM
- 1019 Views
"Pertinent", not "Pertinant". If it weren't in all caps I'd have ignored it this time.
02/12/2009 02:13:36 AM
- 1069 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive
02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM
- 1033 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction?
02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM
- 1011 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way?
02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM
- 994 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing.
02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM
- 1022 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"?
02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM
- 1002 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay*
02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM
- 1150 Views
I was born in the Midwest.
02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM
- 1071 Views
I know.
02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM
- 999 Views
...!
02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM
- 1012 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM
- 1024 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about.
02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM
- 974 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist.
02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM
- 974 Views
Read what you like to read.
02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM
- 1086 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM*
02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM
- 513 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat!
02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM
- 1013 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve.
02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM
- 1054 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though.
02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM
- 1119 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM
- 1033 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure.
02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM
- 1082 Views
I really did get under your skin
02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM
- 958 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass.
03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM
- 1015 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care.
03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM
- 993 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness.
03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM
- 1006 Views
Hm.
02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM
- 1597 Views
Re-read my exact point.
02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM
- 975 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential.
02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM
- 1118 Views
There may have been an assumption about literature due to the reason for the post.
02/12/2009 02:37:47 PM
- 1027 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy
02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM
- 1114 Views
As I see it...
02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM
- 1006 Views
Yep.
02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM
- 1148 Views
Re: Yep.
02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM
- 1028 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially.
02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM
- 923 Views
I wasn't looking to generate controversy
02/12/2009 02:19:13 PM
- 1120 Views
Well... then I'm going to have to agree with Craig a bit.
02/12/2009 02:32:59 PM
- 1111 Views
Well, I was being somewhat denigrating. "Unnecessarily" or not is a matter of debate.
02/12/2009 02:40:29 PM
- 989 Views
Well, it's only "unnecessary" if you don't want people to be turned off of your message immediately. *NM*
02/12/2009 09:42:46 PM
- 497 Views
Judging from the responses, most people weren't turned off immediately.
02/12/2009 09:59:35 PM
- 974 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity.
02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM
- 1025 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no.
02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM
- 976 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic
02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM
- 998 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me.
03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM
- 953 Views
You're playing a game.
03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM
- 1026 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction.
03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM
- 1017 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies?
02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM
- 953 Views
Bulgakov
02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM
- 996 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM
- 968 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M.
02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM
- 923 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM
- 961 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me.
02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM
- 992 Views
I suppose.
02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM
- 1012 Views
Re: I suppose.
02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM
- 1016 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier.
02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM
- 1049 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist.
02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM
- 1012 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction
02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM
- 1093 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler.
02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM
- 1058 Views
There's an interesting book in Russian that might be translated somewhere.
02/12/2009 10:02:48 PM
- 1056 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre.
02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM
- 1026 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points.
02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM
- 1002 Views
the illiad is a classic
02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM
- 1022 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad
02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM
- 991 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree
02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM
- 978 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post!
02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM
- 985 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree.
02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM
- 1102 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read.
02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM
- 1069 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this.
02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM
- 1022 Views
Heh
02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM
- 1027 Views
I have a few objections.
03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM
- 1038 Views
where else should we talk about it?
03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM
- 1002 Views
There's a difference between having threads about it and focusing the official book club on it.
03/12/2009 12:40:53 AM
- 1079 Views
This is the Sci-Fi and Fantasy Board for site optimization purposes.
03/12/2009 01:07:39 AM
- 14024 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line
03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM
- 1038 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy
03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM
- 1046 Views
That's it
03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM
- 1098 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following:
03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM
- 1038 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM*
03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM
- 426 Views
Yes, it is but actually...
03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM
- 1032 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!! *NM*
03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM
- 526 Views
another thing wrong with your argument
03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM
- 1004 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad.
03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM
- 831 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling (including the one on pertinent)
03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM
- 1129 Views
is it just me, or is this now the largest post/thread yet on RAFO.com??? 168 replies so far! *NM*
03/12/2009 05:03:25 PM
- 450 Views
Congratulations on the replies count
03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM
- 1124 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM
- 1072 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM
- 1038 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured.
04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM
- 988 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book?
06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM
- 1142 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM
- 988 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree.
06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM
- 994 Views
I've obviously missed the show here...
04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM
- 960 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing.
04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM
- 1088 Views
What, your penis?
06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM
- 967 Views
Don't you know it!
06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM
- 863 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure.
07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM
- 1019 Views
Metaphor versus literalism
04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM
- 1036 Views
Metaphor divorced from the reality runs risks, however.
04/12/2009 10:25:47 PM
- 953 Views
Honestly, the moral can always be dismissed as inapplicable if you want to dismiss it.
05/12/2009 12:16:39 AM
- 1018 Views
Then why read fiction at all? It's all a diversion.
05/12/2009 04:16:06 PM
- 968 Views
I think people should read non-fiction, and The Nine Hundred Days is an excellent book.
05/12/2009 04:41:50 PM
- 961 Views
aha. but.
07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM
- 1168 Views