Active Users:683 Time:08/11/2025 11:08:52 PM
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad. Tom Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM
I addressed this point earlier. There was a Trojan War, although the version presented in the Iliad is embellished. But you can go see Troy, and the rivers and streams mentioned in the Iliad. You can find every city the heroes came from. We know what their ships and weapons from that period looked like.

The actual poem describes gods, but look at how it does it: when the camp of the Achaean host is struck by disease, it is the work of Apollo shooting his arrows of disease. This is not because someone was "making up" Apollo. The Greeks of Homer's time (or at least of the Heroic Period) actually BELIEVED that this was how diseases could be generated. As a result, that isn't speculative fiction. At worst, it's poetic license, and at best it's firm belief that has since been proven wrong.

Yes, there are a few scenes where the gods participate more directly and talk amongst themselves. But once again, this was how people explained what had happened. It is no different fundamentally than saying Yahweh saved the Children of Israel by parting the Red Sea. We don't consider the Bible to be "speculative fiction," however. We also don't consider the Epic of Gilgamesh, or the Mahabharata or Bhagavad Gita to be speculative fiction. People believed it was true. When all these stories were written down, they had been passed on as part of the oral tradition of their peoples for generations.

That, quite simply, is MYTH. It is fundamentally different than speculative fiction. It is a defunct form of expression because our modern world makes it nearly impossible to generate new myths. Information is recorded almost immediately and supposed facts can be proven. Urban legends are disproven on Snopes.com almost immediately. The closest thing we have today is when academics (or the entire community) "spins" history to prove a certain point for propaganda purposes.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
In Support of Other Fiction - 01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM 2289 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM 1337 Views
Re: - 01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM 1331 Views
Wow...we were just Santified *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:16:21 PM 689 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction. - 01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM 1261 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality. - 01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM 1350 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That. - 01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM 1387 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point. - 02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM 1332 Views
perhaps some university will do a study - 03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM 1316 Views
I'd like to see it - 03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM 1344 Views
I'll get to it once I finish my thesis - 03/12/2009 09:56:29 PM 1285 Views
If it looks like crap and smells like crap... - 03/12/2009 10:04:15 PM 1316 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This. - 03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM 1273 Views
I'd like to see it. - 03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM 1311 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan - 03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM 1294 Views
I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM 1299 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM 1379 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM 1259 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM 1313 Views
I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM 1365 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM 1344 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative. - 04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM 1456 Views
Publication bookend Y2K? - 05/12/2009 10:36:01 AM 1348 Views
They're Thick Bookends. - 05/12/2009 06:12:06 PM 1303 Views
I'll Try to Have It Up Tomorrow Early. - 04/12/2009 11:24:18 PM 1369 Views
I like it. - 01/12/2009 10:28:48 PM 1300 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:43:05 AM 1449 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time - 01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM 1389 Views
And, in recent memory, Orwell was a first-rate writer. - 02/12/2009 01:44:29 AM 1371 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer??? - 03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM 1352 Views
PJF is dirty? - 04/12/2009 12:16:12 AM 1224 Views
Nice post. - 02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM 1390 Views
Perhaps you're right. - 02/12/2009 01:47:10 AM 1282 Views
In its entirety? No. - 02/12/2009 02:00:10 PM 1310 Views
I agree! - 02/12/2009 12:17:10 AM 1580 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:50:22 AM 1242 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half... - 02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM 1410 Views
Popcorn? - 02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM 1347 Views
Yes - 02/12/2009 12:39:10 AM 1384 Views
Lovecraft? - 02/12/2009 12:51:55 AM 1366 Views
Re-read what I said - 02/12/2009 12:55:08 AM 1423 Views
aahh - 02/12/2009 09:26:40 AM 1290 Views
Larry, please tell me you weren't... - 03/12/2009 04:33:32 PM 1162 Views
I concur - 02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM 1280 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing). - 02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM 1358 Views
Thank you - 02/12/2009 09:30:42 AM 1292 Views
more like the mom&pop greasy-spoon diner of writing *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:00:21 PM 612 Views
I'm going to put this in my sig, if you don't mind. - 02/12/2009 03:31:13 AM 1340 Views
hehehe - 02/12/2009 09:31:28 AM 1229 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun? - 02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM 1386 Views
There isn't necessarily a contradiction - 02/12/2009 12:38:43 AM 1374 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason. - 02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM 1285 Views
it didn't come across that way - 03/12/2009 05:15:36 PM 1306 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school, - 02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM 1282 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows - 03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM 1215 Views
We agree! - 03/12/2009 08:03:00 PM 1286 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie. - 02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM 1354 Views
i was gonna point that out. thnks. *NM* - 02/12/2009 01:13:47 AM 572 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous. - 02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM 1381 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting. - 02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM 1316 Views
I think his point was that only SF/F wasn't good food. - 02/12/2009 02:15:29 PM 1287 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that. - 02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM 1223 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though. - 03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM 1201 Views
hear hear!! I agree totally wert-man - 03/12/2009 07:20:09 PM 1280 Views
Which brings us back to my point. - 03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM 1338 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category - 02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM 1341 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today - 02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM 1319 Views
don't get me wrong - 02/12/2009 01:28:08 AM 1312 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive - 02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM 1297 Views
No, they are not - 02/12/2009 02:18:53 AM 1290 Views
This line is a load of bull - 03/12/2009 02:39:53 PM 1411 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction? - 02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM 1255 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way? - 02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM 1247 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing. - 02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM 1262 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"? - 02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM 1251 Views
Either way, I want in. *NM* - 02/12/2009 11:33:52 AM 674 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay* - 02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM 1419 Views
I was born in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 1298 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM 1252 Views
Green Acres in reverse, eh? - 02/12/2009 03:38:09 PM 1283 Views
lmao - 02/12/2009 06:21:17 PM 1445 Views
*piledrivers you* - 02/12/2009 06:28:02 PM 1220 Views
...! - 02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM 1242 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM 1286 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM 1222 Views
Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:39:36 PM 1228 Views
Re: Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:42:47 PM 1260 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist. - 02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM 1252 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 02:21:00 AM 1150 Views
Shitstorm! - 02/12/2009 03:06:59 AM 1208 Views
Heh heh heh. - 02/12/2009 03:45:40 AM 1266 Views
Read what you like to read. - 02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM 1353 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM 623 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat! - 02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM 1258 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve. - 02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM 1294 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though. - 02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM 1365 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM 1284 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 03:26:59 PM 1291 Views
Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:30:50 PM 1206 Views
Re: Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:32:06 PM 1205 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM 1356 Views
I really did get under your skin - 02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM 1202 Views
- 02/12/2009 10:06:46 PM 1201 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass. - 03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM 1278 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care. - 03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM 1235 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness. - 03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM 1256 Views
Your subject line reinforces my opinion. - 03/12/2009 05:31:50 AM 1172 Views
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. *NM* - 03/12/2009 07:21:05 AM 617 Views
LOL! - 04/12/2009 12:21:36 AM 1228 Views
See, you just proved my point. - 04/12/2009 12:39:59 AM 1276 Views
Hm. - 02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM 1861 Views
Re-read my exact point. - 02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM 1217 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential. - 02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM 1353 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy - 02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM 1374 Views
As I see it... - 02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM 1260 Views
Yep. - 02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM 1409 Views
Re: Yep. - 02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM 1275 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM 1193 Views
Re: Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 04:00:35 PM 1223 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 04:18:16 PM 1275 Views
Re: I know. - 02/12/2009 04:23:14 PM 1214 Views
That is why he's so good, in my opinion. - 02/12/2009 06:15:45 PM 1380 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity. - 02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM 1255 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no. - 02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM 1222 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic - 02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM 1241 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me. - 03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM 1194 Views
You're playing a game. - 03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM 1297 Views
I like your response. *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:37:09 PM 594 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction. - 03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM 1294 Views
Oh I concur on that distinction. - 04/12/2009 09:06:34 PM 1316 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies? - 02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM 1186 Views
Bulgakov - 02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM 1283 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM 1252 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM 1164 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM 1209 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM 1264 Views
I suppose. - 02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM 1260 Views
Re: I suppose. - 02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM 1273 Views
Well, I don't hold escapism in such low esteem *NM* - 02/12/2009 07:56:13 PM 621 Views
That is what I mean - 02/12/2009 08:36:02 PM 1204 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier. - 02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM 1314 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist. - 02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM 1258 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction - 02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM 1345 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler. - 02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM 1317 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre. - 02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM 1283 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points. - 02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM 1242 Views
the illiad is a classic - 02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM 1259 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad - 02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM 1237 Views
Is there a safe answer to that question? *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:33:21 PM 641 Views
Maybe not. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:59:09 AM 613 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree - 02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM 1239 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM 1257 Views
Re: Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:20:49 PM 1217 Views
I don't know. I've only read about 30 pages so far. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:05:54 PM 666 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree. - 02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM 1345 Views
Hmmm - 02/12/2009 08:40:53 PM 1226 Views
Re: Hmmm - 02/12/2009 10:48:02 PM 1250 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read. - 02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM 1323 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this. - 02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM 1273 Views
Heh - 02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM 1268 Views
What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:01:08 AM 1249 Views
Re: What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:10:35 AM 1283 Views
I see. You don't read announcements. - 03/12/2009 11:12:04 AM 1222 Views
No, but it does bill itself as science fiction/fantasy. - 02/12/2009 10:51:41 PM 1368 Views
Yes. - 03/12/2009 12:01:30 AM 1342 Views
I think Rebekah and Camilla put it well. - 02/12/2009 10:05:24 PM 1354 Views
I think they make good points, as I said above. - 02/12/2009 10:56:55 PM 1225 Views
I agree with in principle - 02/12/2009 11:22:19 PM 1193 Views
Certainly. People are free to skip any discussion. - 03/12/2009 01:01:40 AM 1342 Views
I have a few objections. - 03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM 1302 Views
where else should we talk about it? - 03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM 1241 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line - 03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM 1311 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM 1301 Views
Re: I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:38:17 AM 1353 Views
That's it - 03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM 1380 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following: - 03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM 1273 Views
Certainly - 03/12/2009 06:13:38 AM 1339 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM 535 Views
According to whom? *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:55:45 PM 666 Views
Yeah. What she asked! *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:23:55 PM 653 Views
Yes, it is but actually... - 03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM 1272 Views
Eternal Sunshine doesn't have a mad scientist. - 03/12/2009 10:09:01 PM 1202 Views
Really? - 04/12/2009 07:01:42 PM 1240 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!! *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM 643 Views
*pumps fist* Give it up for Dan Brown! *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:58:23 AM 653 Views
That's Dan "booyah" Brown!!! Booyah!!! *NM* - 04/12/2009 02:00:56 AM 642 Views
another thing wrong with your argument - 03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM 1275 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad. - 03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM 1086 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling (including the one on pertinent) - 03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM 1379 Views
No problem. On the substantive points: - 03/12/2009 08:00:33 PM 1316 Views
more importantly, which I think it being lost in all this, - 03/12/2009 08:05:27 PM 1272 Views
I'm not reading the Iliad again, once was enough - 04/12/2009 12:19:07 PM 1231 Views
Congratulations on the replies count - 03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM 1376 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM 1300 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM 1337 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured. - 04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM 1234 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book? - 06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM 1408 Views
YES. - 06/12/2009 03:34:17 PM 1177 Views
NO - 07/12/2009 08:40:33 PM 1290 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM 1266 Views
Yes, it is worse with movies. Much worse, in fact. - 04/12/2009 10:33:18 PM 1301 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM 1261 Views
Maybe we're different, but I don't care for FX - 06/12/2009 01:37:53 PM 1231 Views
This is not about the personal taste - 07/12/2009 08:50:34 PM 1310 Views
I've obviously missed the show here... - 04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM 1218 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing. - 04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM 1336 Views
What, your penis? - 06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM 1246 Views
Don't you know it! - 06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM 1123 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure. - 07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM 1280 Views
Hate to break it to you... - 07/12/2009 09:54:24 PM 1331 Views
I thought you were gonna tell me... - 08/12/2009 03:07:54 PM 1393 Views
Metaphor versus literalism - 04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM 1297 Views
aha. but. - 07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM 1438 Views
Quoting Nietzsche is really hitting below the belt. - 07/12/2009 09:12:34 PM 1363 Views
It is good I was only paraphrasing, then - 08/12/2009 10:44:14 AM 1260 Views

Reply to Message