I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it.
Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.
For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).
But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.
For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).
But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.
I've never read any of Carey's stuff ... but those kinds of discussions (implications on history, cultural development, plot devices, narrative techniques, etc etc) are ones I like, and I'm willing to be that a lot of other people would participate too. There are very clearly a lot of people who frequent this board who are intelligent fantasy fans. And anyway, you never know until you try.
Insert theme music here.
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion.
- 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM
1792 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste)
- 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM
1320 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books.
- 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM
1366 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M.
- 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM
1397 Views
I disagree slightly
- 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM
1218 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate.
- 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM
1277 Views
- 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM
1277 Views
Oh, I almost forgot
- 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM
1249 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM*
- 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM
501 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen
- 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM
1340 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book.
- 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM
1195 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book
- 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM
1203 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness?
- 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM
1109 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen
- 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM
1396 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise.
- 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM
1125 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise.
- 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM
1440 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well.
- 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM
1314 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed.
- 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM
1474 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps.
- 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM
1331 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine.
- 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM
1362 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator?
- 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM
1290 Views
I'd laugh...
- 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM
1065 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion.
- 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM
1410 Views
It's frustrating though...
- 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM
1354 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it.
- 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM
1372 Views
Perhaps.
- 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM
1071 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised.
- 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM
1125 Views
You're not.
- 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM
1178 Views
Her next series sounds interesting
- 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM
1064 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic.
- 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM
1108 Views
Yes, but how so?
- 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM
1198 Views
Well...
- 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM
1280 Views
Honestly...
- 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM
1277 Views
Absolutely.
- 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM
1402 Views
Re: Absolutely.
- 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM
1211 Views
In short, not a good name for a daughter. At least not one with an interest in Classics.
- 15/01/2010 05:32:35 AM
1187 Views
I'm staying far, far away from Seneca.
- 15/01/2010 02:01:49 PM
1437 Views
Ah, yes. The Apocolocyntosis. Possibly the least amusing humor ever penned. I hate Seneca. *NM*
- 16/01/2010 02:14:32 AM
466 Views
I really don't think it would.
- 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM
1267 Views
I have tried before.
- 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM
1143 Views
If it is well-written and defends the value of the book, I don't see why you shouldn't post it.
- 12/01/2010 05:12:58 PM
1335 Views
I'm quite enjoying it.
- 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM
1287 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion.
- 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM
1169 Views
I have to agree
- 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM
1287 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM*
- 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM
508 Views

True, true.