Active Users:1857 Time:22/11/2025 10:03:58 AM
I really don't think it would. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.

For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).

But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.


Why don't you try?
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1665 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1220 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1267 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1310 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1139 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1392 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 1063 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 512 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1232 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1205 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1132 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1115 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1166 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1214 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1274 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1154 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 456 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1237 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1103 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1109 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 1013 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1358 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1236 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1239 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 1025 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1316 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1207 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 998 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1280 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1444 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1370 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1236 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1265 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1176 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1083 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 960 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 1014 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 457 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1189 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1289 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1266 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1246 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 973 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 1024 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1131 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1073 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 951 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 1011 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1089 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1176 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1175 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1313 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1098 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 957 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1340 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1153 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 1053 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1209 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 914 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1308 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1359 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 633 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1184 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 1055 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1183 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 458 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 1057 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 1013 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 584 Views

Reply to Message