Active Users:332 Time:17/06/2025 12:55:35 PM
Absolutely. Elaine Send a noteboard - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM

Phèdre is a large part of what makes the books good. The second trilogy is as good as the first in terms of story, I'm sure, but it just feels less interesting because the main character is not Phèdre (and because it's not as original anymore, I guess).


I completely agree. Though Imriel grew on me, and I'm going to re-read his trilogy next. I've overdosed on historical fiction in the last while and need a change of pace. Which reminds me, I have to pester Tash about reading Sharon Penman.

Incidentally, I just read Racine's tragedy Phèdre, about the character in Greek mythology she was named after - there are a few references to that in the books too. It was interesting, though I can't say I found many similarities.


Really? I love the name, actually, should probably read the play (is it a play?) before naming my firstborn though.....
Elaine
Irish Honey
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1591 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1141 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1155 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1230 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1062 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1304 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 981 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 464 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1147 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1083 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1056 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1033 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1087 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1136 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1175 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1084 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 410 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1152 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1015 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1036 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 926 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1254 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1137 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1146 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 945 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1224 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1111 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 916 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1200 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1346 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1288 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1144 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1206 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1094 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1001 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 882 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 929 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 406 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1110 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1195 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1159 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1167 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 885 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 945 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1053 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1005 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 873 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 926 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1018 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1082 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1066 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1215 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1025 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 845 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1245 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1078 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 977 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1122 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 829 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1211 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1277 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 588 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1110 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 955 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1106 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 414 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 978 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 942 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 556 Views

Reply to Message