As in, there are many important aspects of being king he doesn't have to face.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 09/04/2010 08:07:16 PM
Sauron is damned scary. The Dead? He practically rebuilds a ruined Gondor and an Arnor that has been nonexistent. And he gives the hobbits their land free of any big people.
Also, he has healing hands!
I am not sure intrigue should be the criteria for a good king.
Edit: you have not forgotten the beer also becomes better with him as king, I hope?
Also, he has healing hands!
I am not sure intrigue should be the criteria for a good king.
Edit: you have not forgotten the beer also becomes better with him as king, I hope?
Intrigue and politics being an important one of those. He needs a lot of personal courage and all, and his healing hands, but the way Tolkien describes Middle-Earth, Gondor is a very loyal and homogeneous country indeed, without much in the way of political undercurrents or people he has to reconciliate. Admittedly, Arnor is trickier, what with the relations with the Hobbits and the local folk, and same with Umbar and the other southern/eastern lands.
Of course, he does most of the impressive stuff before actually being a king, regardless.

The greatest King in Fantasy
09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM
- 1993 Views
King Arthur. Hands down.
09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM
- 1376 Views
I would argue with you.
09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM
- 1340 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable.
09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM
- 1377 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac
09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM
- 1377 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel.
09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM
- 1392 Views

when I read the actual book...
10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM
- 1393 Views
"The actual character"? Which of the countless different ones? *NM*
10/04/2010 12:21:00 AM
- 657 Views
i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
10/04/2010 12:51:44 AM
- 1469 Views
There isn't an "actual book." Le Morte d'Arthur is a relatively early compilation of legends. *NM*
10/04/2010 03:09:40 AM
- 700 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur
09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM
- 1422 Views
My money is still on Aragorn
09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM
- 1489 Views
Aragorn is so awesome...
09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM
- 1354 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM
- 1317 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM
- 1375 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM
- 1320 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM
- 1578 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM
- 1424 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM
- 1317 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM
- 1410 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM
- 1328 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome.
09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM
- 1416 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM
- 1373 Views
Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
09/04/2010 06:55:23 PM
- 1388 Views
Re: Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
09/04/2010 07:04:37 PM
- 1391 Views
thought of a better example: Arien the Maia of the Sun was single and far more powerful than Tilion
09/04/2010 09:17:34 PM
- 1624 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM
- 1484 Views
That was my first assumption too, but evidently not. *NM*
09/04/2010 05:22:39 PM
- 640 Views
I changed it to Livia Augusta
Sheesh, you people-- a guy mistypes one time!! *NM*
09/04/2010 05:29:03 PM
- 702 Views

I call bullshit
09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM
- 1321 Views
Re: I call bullshit
09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM
- 1345 Views
Re: I call bullshit
10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM
- 1428 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist.
10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM
- 1421 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things.
09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM
- 1623 Views
Doesn't have to face many things?
09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM
- 1390 Views
As in, there are many important aspects of being king he doesn't have to face.
09/04/2010 08:07:16 PM
- 1372 Views
well technically speaking he WAS the king when he did all those things.
10/04/2010 12:15:26 AM
- 1380 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM
- 1236 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM
- 1327 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn
09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM
- 1340 Views
I'm going to go with a tie...
09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM
- 1355 Views
Rohan was a whiny hypocritical bitch who failed at the only real test of rulership he ever faced.
10/04/2010 02:51:34 AM
- 1404 Views
Artur Hawkwing
10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM
- 1504 Views
Alexander the Great?
*NM*
10/04/2010 05:08:25 AM
- 670 Views

AH conquered more, did better, & was not a huge d-bag. Alex would have commissioned that big statue *NM*
12/04/2010 03:00:39 PM
- 648 Views
And both managed to have their so-called "empires" crumble within a year of their death. *NM*
12/04/2010 06:12:20 PM
- 656 Views
Which just reinforces how awesome AH was - no one else could do what he did
13/04/2010 11:50:54 AM
- 1427 Views
???
10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM
- 1893 Views
Ta'veren is not a power, it is an accomodation with what the Pattern demands of certain people
12/04/2010 02:56:57 PM
- 1324 Views
What's the name of the Lemur-thing that's the King in "the penguins of madagascar"? He gets my vote! *NM*
14/04/2010 04:46:42 AM
- 703 Views