Active Users:2496 Time:30/04/2026 08:41:24 AM
Re: i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book. Camilla Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 08:17:12 AM
Not one of his representations in a movie/other book. The actual Le Morte d'Artur (or however it's spelled).


Morte d'Artur was only written in the late 1400s. He is basing it on much older material.

Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain, from the 1130s, treats Arthur pretty much like any other warrior king conquering France. But he has no Lancelot (Mordred takes Guinevere as a wife, but there is no concept of courtly love). He did invent Merlin, though.

If you are going to go with "actual" book, though, that would be as close as you'd get. But the concept makes no sense when talking of Arthur. Monmouth most likely had a basis in older legend, and his story was further developed through several incarnations. We get Excalibur named in Wace' Roman Du Brut (1150s), who also introduces a more courtly mode and the idea of the round table.

Which brings it into the French court and Eleanor of Aquitaine and probably to the attention of Chretien de Troyes, who really develops the grail story.

And only after a round trip on the continent does it get to Malory.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
The greatest King in Fantasy - 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM 2211 Views
King Arthur. Hands down. - 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM 1606 Views
I would argue with you. - 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM 1555 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable. - 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM 1594 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac - 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM 1563 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. - 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM 1622 Views
when I read the actual book... - 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM 1586 Views
"The actual character"? Which of the countless different ones? *NM* - 10/04/2010 12:21:00 AM 753 Views
i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book. - 10/04/2010 12:51:44 AM 1677 Views
Re: i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book. - 10/04/2010 08:17:12 AM 1560 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur - 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM 1648 Views
My money is still on Aragorn - 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM 1689 Views
Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM 1538 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM 1500 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though. - 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM 1574 Views
Hm - 09/04/2010 03:23:53 PM 1638 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM 1515 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien. - 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM 1786 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM 1631 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM 1517 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM 1638 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate - 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM 1547 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM 1615 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 09/04/2010 05:45:06 PM 1685 Views
Re: I rather liked her depiction in Rome. - 10/04/2010 11:14:26 AM 1678 Views
I don't know if I'd call it bad, per se. - 10/04/2010 11:37:55 AM 1812 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM 1599 Views
Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:31:42 PM 1569 Views
Re: Eh, the other Vala don't do much of anything either. - 09/04/2010 05:44:03 PM 1558 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses. - 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM 1713 Views
I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM 1513 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM 1519 Views
Re: I call bullshit - 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM 1616 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM 1615 Views
Re: I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist. - 12/04/2010 11:00:23 AM 1490 Views
Exactly. - 13/04/2010 03:08:46 AM 1621 Views
Re: Exactly. - 13/04/2010 08:54:01 AM 1702 Views
I was going to say something similar. - 09/04/2010 03:21:45 PM 1540 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:00:25 PM 1507 Views
Re: Aragorn is so awesome... - 09/04/2010 08:37:12 PM 1546 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things. - 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM 1840 Views
Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM 1590 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM 1436 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM 1561 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 10/04/2010 05:08:42 PM 1692 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things? - 12/04/2010 10:55:12 AM 1554 Views
He really wasn't a king in majority of the story though - 12/04/2010 05:54:23 PM 1509 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn - 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM 1535 Views
Oh yeah I liked him a lot *NM* - 09/04/2010 04:09:59 PM 778 Views
Josua Lackhand is a great fantasy King! - 09/04/2010 05:14:39 PM 1589 Views
Arutha was never King. *NM* - 09/04/2010 07:18:30 PM 732 Views
I'm going to go with a tie... - 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM 1536 Views
Joffrey and the Stag! *NM* - 09/04/2010 09:53:56 PM 746 Views
ROFL *NM* - 09/04/2010 11:39:36 PM 712 Views
Artur Hawkwing - 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM 1704 Views
??? - 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM 2125 Views
Simba *NM* - 10/04/2010 08:40:38 AM 800 Views
Manwe - 10/04/2010 10:31:54 AM 2021 Views
Bah. He's hardly a character. *NM* - 12/04/2010 01:07:29 AM 902 Views
Arutha, the Prince of Krondor - 12/04/2010 01:06:14 AM 1613 Views
Westley - 13/04/2010 02:59:36 AM 1582 Views
Leto Atreides II - 13/04/2010 05:07:29 AM 1495 Views
I'll agree with that! *NM* - 13/04/2010 11:33:10 AM 744 Views

Reply to Message