Re: i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
Camilla Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 08:17:12 AM
Not one of his representations in a movie/other book. The actual Le Morte d'Artur (or however it's spelled).
Morte d'Artur was only written in the late 1400s. He is basing it on much older material.
Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain, from the 1130s, treats Arthur pretty much like any other warrior king conquering France. But he has no Lancelot (Mordred takes Guinevere as a wife, but there is no concept of courtly love). He did invent Merlin, though.
If you are going to go with "actual" book, though, that would be as close as you'd get. But the concept makes no sense when talking of Arthur. Monmouth most likely had a basis in older legend, and his story was further developed through several incarnations. We get Excalibur named in Wace' Roman Du Brut (1150s), who also introduces a more courtly mode and the idea of the round table.
Which brings it into the French court and Eleanor of Aquitaine and probably to the attention of Chretien de Troyes, who really develops the grail story.
And only after a round trip on the continent does it get to Malory.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
The greatest King in Fantasy
- 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM
1993 Views
King Arthur. Hands down.
- 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM
1376 Views
I would argue with you.
- 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM
1340 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable.
- 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM
1377 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac
- 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM
1377 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. 
- 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM
1392 Views
- 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM
1392 Views
when I read the actual book...
- 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM
1393 Views
"The actual character"? Which of the countless different ones? *NM*
- 10/04/2010 12:21:00 AM
657 Views
i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
- 10/04/2010 12:51:44 AM
1469 Views
There isn't an "actual book." Le Morte d'Arthur is a relatively early compilation of legends. *NM*
- 10/04/2010 03:09:40 AM
700 Views
Re: i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
- 10/04/2010 08:17:12 AM
1389 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur
- 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM
1422 Views
My money is still on Aragorn
- 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM
1489 Views
Aragorn is so awesome...
- 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM
1354 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
- 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM
1317 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
- 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM
1375 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
- 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM
1320 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
- 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM
1578 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM
1424 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM
1317 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
- 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM
1410 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
- 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM
1328 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome.
- 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM
1416 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM
1373 Views
Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
- 09/04/2010 06:55:23 PM
1388 Views
Re: Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
- 09/04/2010 07:04:37 PM
1391 Views
thought of a better example: Arien the Maia of the Sun was single and far more powerful than Tilion
- 09/04/2010 09:17:34 PM
1624 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM
1484 Views
That was my first assumption too, but evidently not. *NM*
- 09/04/2010 05:22:39 PM
640 Views
I changed it to Livia Augusta Sheesh, you people-- a guy mistypes one time!! *NM*
- 09/04/2010 05:29:03 PM
702 Views
Sheesh, you people-- a guy mistypes one time!! *NM*
- 09/04/2010 05:29:03 PM
702 Views
I call bullshit
- 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM
1321 Views
Re: I call bullshit
- 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM
1345 Views
Re: I call bullshit
- 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM
1428 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist.
- 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM
1421 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things.
- 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM
1623 Views
Doesn't have to face many things?
- 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM
1390 Views
As in, there are many important aspects of being king he doesn't have to face.
- 09/04/2010 08:07:16 PM
1371 Views
well technically speaking he WAS the king when he did all those things.
- 10/04/2010 12:15:26 AM
1380 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
- 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM
1236 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
- 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM
1327 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn
- 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM
1340 Views
I'm going to go with a tie...
- 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM
1355 Views
Rohan was a whiny hypocritical bitch who failed at the only real test of rulership he ever faced.
- 10/04/2010 02:51:34 AM
1404 Views
Artur Hawkwing
- 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM
1504 Views
Alexander the Great? *NM*
- 10/04/2010 05:08:25 AM
670 Views
*NM*
- 10/04/2010 05:08:25 AM
670 Views
AH conquered more, did better, & was not a huge d-bag. Alex would have commissioned that big statue *NM*
- 12/04/2010 03:00:39 PM
648 Views
And both managed to have their so-called "empires" crumble within a year of their death. *NM*
- 12/04/2010 06:12:20 PM
656 Views
Which just reinforces how awesome AH was - no one else could do what he did
- 13/04/2010 11:50:54 AM
1427 Views
???
- 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM
1893 Views
Ta'veren is not a power, it is an accomodation with what the Pattern demands of certain people
- 12/04/2010 02:56:57 PM
1324 Views
What's the name of the Lemur-thing that's the King in "the penguins of madagascar"? He gets my vote! *NM*
- 14/04/2010 04:46:42 AM
703 Views