Re: i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
Camilla Send a noteboard - 10/04/2010 08:17:12 AM
Not one of his representations in a movie/other book. The actual Le Morte d'Artur (or however it's spelled).
Morte d'Artur was only written in the late 1400s. He is basing it on much older material.
Geoffrey of Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain, from the 1130s, treats Arthur pretty much like any other warrior king conquering France. But he has no Lancelot (Mordred takes Guinevere as a wife, but there is no concept of courtly love). He did invent Merlin, though.
If you are going to go with "actual" book, though, that would be as close as you'd get. But the concept makes no sense when talking of Arthur. Monmouth most likely had a basis in older legend, and his story was further developed through several incarnations. We get Excalibur named in Wace' Roman Du Brut (1150s), who also introduces a more courtly mode and the idea of the round table.
Which brings it into the French court and Eleanor of Aquitaine and probably to the attention of Chretien de Troyes, who really develops the grail story.
And only after a round trip on the continent does it get to Malory.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
The greatest King in Fantasy
- 09/04/2010 05:18:42 AM
2013 Views
King Arthur. Hands down.
- 09/04/2010 06:40:15 AM
1391 Views
I would argue with you.
- 09/04/2010 06:54:53 AM
1357 Views
That's the point, though. Arthur's humanity is what makes him so admirable.
- 09/04/2010 06:59:07 AM
1396 Views
I have to agree with Dannymac
- 09/04/2010 02:04:44 PM
1394 Views
But he's not in a modern fantasy novel. 
- 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM
1409 Views
- 09/04/2010 07:37:14 PM
1409 Views
when I read the actual book...
- 10/04/2010 12:08:21 AM
1413 Views
"The actual character"? Which of the countless different ones? *NM*
- 10/04/2010 12:21:00 AM
664 Views
i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
- 10/04/2010 12:51:44 AM
1501 Views
There isn't an "actual book." Le Morte d'Arthur is a relatively early compilation of legends. *NM*
- 10/04/2010 03:09:40 AM
708 Views
Re: i mean the actual character of Arthur in the actual book.
- 10/04/2010 08:17:12 AM
1404 Views
I'm going with the most likely historical version of King Arthur
- 09/04/2010 06:45:26 PM
1441 Views
My money is still on Aragorn
- 09/04/2010 12:47:43 PM
1507 Views
Aragorn is so awesome...
- 09/04/2010 02:05:42 PM
1372 Views
Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
- 09/04/2010 02:18:30 PM
1336 Views
Re: Arwen's character is just never fleshed out, though.
- 09/04/2010 02:49:45 PM
1394 Views
Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
- 09/04/2010 03:32:00 PM
1339 Views
Re: Mostly, yes, but there are a few exceptions - Galadriel, Eowyn, and above all Luthien.
- 09/04/2010 03:45:37 PM
1597 Views
I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 04:34:15 PM
1442 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 04:55:34 PM
1336 Views
If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
- 09/04/2010 05:09:20 PM
1425 Views
Re: If Tacitus and Graves were accurate
- 09/04/2010 05:26:43 PM
1347 Views
I rather liked her depiction in Rome.
- 09/04/2010 05:34:37 PM
1435 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 05:02:50 PM
1389 Views
Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
- 09/04/2010 06:55:23 PM
1405 Views
Re: Nienna, the Valier of Mercy, was single and a wanderer. She's not the most powerful, but...
- 09/04/2010 07:04:37 PM
1409 Views
thought of a better example: Arien the Maia of the Sun was single and far more powerful than Tilion
- 09/04/2010 09:17:34 PM
1642 Views
Re: I can't agree about the goddesses.
- 09/04/2010 05:06:49 PM
1503 Views
That was my first assumption too, but evidently not. *NM*
- 09/04/2010 05:22:39 PM
647 Views
I changed it to Livia Augusta Sheesh, you people-- a guy mistypes one time!! *NM*
- 09/04/2010 05:29:03 PM
709 Views
Sheesh, you people-- a guy mistypes one time!! *NM*
- 09/04/2010 05:29:03 PM
709 Views
I call bullshit
- 09/04/2010 08:09:49 PM
1338 Views
Re: I call bullshit
- 09/04/2010 08:31:16 PM
1363 Views
Re: I call bullshit
- 10/04/2010 08:04:15 AM
1446 Views
I didn't realize it was fashionable to call Tolkien sexist.
- 10/04/2010 05:12:07 PM
1439 Views
He's good, but then he just doesn't have to face so many things.
- 09/04/2010 02:22:04 PM
1641 Views
Doesn't have to face many things?
- 09/04/2010 07:59:27 PM
1408 Views
As in, there are many important aspects of being king he doesn't have to face.
- 09/04/2010 08:07:16 PM
1393 Views
well technically speaking he WAS the king when he did all those things.
- 10/04/2010 12:15:26 AM
1400 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
- 09/04/2010 08:38:51 PM
1254 Views
Re: Doesn't have to face many things?
- 10/04/2010 08:24:33 AM
1347 Views
I'm sure there are many, but one coming to mind is Prince Josua from Memory, Sorrow and Thorn
- 09/04/2010 02:23:57 PM
1363 Views
I'm going to go with a tie...
- 09/04/2010 04:22:42 PM
1369 Views
Rohan was a whiny hypocritical bitch who failed at the only real test of rulership he ever faced.
- 10/04/2010 02:51:34 AM
1424 Views
Artur Hawkwing
- 10/04/2010 03:34:02 AM
1521 Views
Alexander the Great? *NM*
- 10/04/2010 05:08:25 AM
676 Views
*NM*
- 10/04/2010 05:08:25 AM
676 Views
AH conquered more, did better, & was not a huge d-bag. Alex would have commissioned that big statue *NM*
- 12/04/2010 03:00:39 PM
655 Views
And both managed to have their so-called "empires" crumble within a year of their death. *NM*
- 12/04/2010 06:12:20 PM
662 Views
Which just reinforces how awesome AH was - no one else could do what he did
- 13/04/2010 11:50:54 AM
1445 Views
???
- 10/04/2010 10:30:13 AM
1916 Views
Ta'veren is not a power, it is an accomodation with what the Pattern demands of certain people
- 12/04/2010 02:56:57 PM
1340 Views
What's the name of the Lemur-thing that's the King in "the penguins of madagascar"? He gets my vote! *NM*
- 14/04/2010 04:46:42 AM
710 Views