Of course, if you will admit that the Bible is a flawed document and you're willing to disregard Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:27, then you don't have a problem. You resist this, however, and therefore you continue in a hypocritical position.
I do believe he would agree to consider the Bible "flawed" in the sense that verses can be overruled by other verses, or even by general principles that aren't directly related to the point. The Bible really does not provide much direct ammunition to people wanting to defend gay rights or the equal value of gay relationships, but if you look at it the way Danny seems to - regarding it not so much as "flawed", but rather as a mosaic of texts that can contradict each other on some points, and which become religious truth only when taken as a whole (and hence, inevitably, interpreted) - one can refuse to heed the anti-gay verses. Without rejecting the Bible, or even just parts of it.
Presbyterian Church (USA) passes Amendment 10-A.
- 11/05/2011 05:39:29 PM
1418 Views
*NM*
What's the language? Did they at least TRY to give a doctrinal justification?
- 12/05/2011 02:10:46 AM
941 Views
Thank you for that rousing argument against married priests.
- 12/05/2011 03:36:51 AM
904 Views
Why ARE you letting women into the priesthood?
- 12/05/2011 04:16:50 AM
851 Views
Because Episcopalians don't listen to the Bible much.
- 12/05/2011 05:47:03 AM
794 Views
That's just fine as far as I'm concerned
- 12/05/2011 02:23:44 PM
801 Views
Yes, I suppose a church could go that route.
- 14/05/2011 07:38:02 AM
761 Views
I'm not attempting to impose a dichotomy on the Bible.
- 14/05/2011 03:25:30 PM
833 Views
I don't even know what following the Bible in its entirety means.
- 14/05/2011 09:09:10 PM
1002 Views
As an exercise, I tried to think of how I would justify allowing homosexuals as clergy.
- 14/05/2011 04:19:43 PM
812 Views
Thanks (I'm actually OK with women priests though).
- 12/05/2011 07:09:11 AM
887 Views
There's ample precedent for female religious leaders, even within the bible.
- 12/05/2011 06:51:05 AM
917 Views
Since when is Moses' society the be-all end all?
- 12/05/2011 07:12:41 PM
788 Views
Since never, which is why I referenced five other eras you completely ignored.
- 14/05/2011 01:11:30 AM
893 Views
They did so, via negativa.
- 12/05/2011 04:22:17 PM
941 Views
Sorry for the delay, particularly since it looks like I'll be spending a fair amount of time here.
- 14/05/2011 12:31:33 AM
749 Views
Your church has a constitution?!
- 12/05/2011 03:36:41 AM
806 Views
My Church has a congress! 
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
395 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:37:52 AM
395 Views
Haha no way! *NM*
- 12/05/2011 03:46:32 AM
349 Views
Well, we have one group of laity and one of bishops, so it is only mildy utter chaos. 
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
394 Views
*NM*
- 12/05/2011 05:51:09 AM
394 Views
I'm happy to hear this, personally. I also wonder how you reconcile this with the Bible.
- 12/05/2011 04:11:31 AM
996 Views
Every direct reference to homosexuality in the Bible is a reference to rape.
- 12/05/2011 04:12:43 PM
824 Views
Every single word that you wrote in your response is complete bullshit.
- 12/05/2011 05:50:07 PM
954 Views
Knock off your eisegesis, try some exegesis
- 12/05/2011 07:02:45 PM
872 Views
I'm trying to figure out just what your "gifts" are, because I don't see any.
- 12/05/2011 07:30:39 PM
841 Views
There are cases in which hypocrisy is far better than the alternatives.
- 12/05/2011 10:04:32 PM
917 Views
Hypocrisy is better than, say, setting gays on fire, yes.
- 12/05/2011 10:10:40 PM
893 Views
My statement is that, from a pragmatic point of view, hypocrisy shouldn't be discouraged too much.
- 13/05/2011 10:05:39 PM
890 Views
Oh, is that how we're playing this, then?
- 13/05/2011 06:29:31 PM
847 Views
I'm not playing. I'm pointing out some glaring errors on your part.
- 13/05/2011 07:25:08 PM
739 Views
Danny will correct me if I'm wrong, but...
- 13/05/2011 09:55:14 PM
948 Views
The Bible says what it says. The problem... people like to tell us just what else it's saying.
- 13/05/2011 05:31:29 PM
803 Views
You don't reconcile... you pick the parts you like and adjust the rest to suit you.
- 13/05/2011 09:33:54 PM
738 Views
Another example...
- 12/05/2011 09:19:52 AM
740 Views
If you claim to follow the entire Bible, then you are completely correct.
- 12/05/2011 06:04:38 PM
737 Views
On the contrary, this move will take some butts out of the seats.
- 12/05/2011 07:16:22 PM
780 Views
We both know that isn't the case
- 12/05/2011 07:55:41 PM
884 Views
Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
- 12/05/2011 05:33:49 PM
843 Views
No Protestant denomination has added so much as a word to the Bible
- 12/05/2011 05:58:16 PM
718 Views
So, everyone hates Judith, then?
- 12/05/2011 06:40:11 PM
788 Views
The Catholics and Eastern Orthodox Churches accept Judith as part of Scripture.
- 12/05/2011 07:51:27 PM
757 Views
Does the Eastern Orthodox Church also segregate deuterocanonical works like Roman Catholicism does?
- 14/05/2011 02:19:03 AM
1069 Views
The Eastern Church bases everything on the Septuagint.
- 14/05/2011 02:34:41 AM
808 Views
That sounds appealing, and makes sense.
- 14/05/2011 02:44:56 AM
823 Views
Oh, I just enjoy calling Protestants "heretics" to remind them not everyone agrees with them.
- 14/05/2011 03:25:42 AM
769 Views
Re: Cool cool. I have a question on a semi-related note, about Protestant Gospels
- 12/05/2011 08:52:48 PM
794 Views
The NIV is terrible. The NASB has the best translation I have found (of the NT, at least).
- 12/05/2011 10:43:58 PM
932 Views
I find this really weird, to be honest
- 13/05/2011 05:48:28 AM
801 Views
Well, it wasn't just Athanasius. But yes, we are lucky in that respect. *NM*
- 13/05/2011 06:32:48 AM
332 Views
Athanasius's list reflected the victory of Pauline Christianity
- 13/05/2011 02:52:53 PM
757 Views
There's a school of thought that says that's a strong vindication of Athanasius. 
- 14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
706 Views
- 14/05/2011 02:37:49 AM
706 Views